Deciding as bringing deliberation to a close

Social Science Information

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 111-140

  Urfalino, Philippe ^a  

^a ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES   (France)

Author keywords

Collective decision; Deliberation; Individual decision; Intention; Raz; Stopping rules

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649263755     PISSN: 05390184     EISSN: 14617412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0539018409354812     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anscombe, E. (1957) Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Black, D. (1950) The unity of political and economic science, The Economic journal 60(239): 506-14.
3. Bratman, M. (1993) Shared intention, Ethics 104: 97-113.
4. Colomer, J. & McLean, I. (1998) Electing popes: approval balloting and qualified-majority rule, Journal of interdisciplinary history XXIX (I, summer): 1-22.
5. Congar, Y. (1958) Quod omnes tangit, ab omnibus tractari et approbari debet, Revue historique de Droit français et étranger XXXV: 210-59.
6. De Lara, P. (2003) Règles, normes, institutions, in Ph. Raynaud & S. Rials (eds) Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, pp. 640-7. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France [2e édn].
7. Descombes, V. (1995) L'action, in D. Kambouchner (ed.) Notions de philosophie II, pp. 103-74. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
8. Descombes, V. (2004) Le complément de sujet. Enquête sur le fait d'agir de soi-même. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
9. El-Hakim, S. (1978) The structure and dynamics of consensus decision-making, Man XIII: 55-71.
10. Elster, J. (2007) Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ferejohn, J. & Pasquino, P. (2002) Constitutional courts as deliberative institutions, in W. Sadurski (ed.) Constitutional justice, East and West, pp 21-36. London: Kluwer Law International.
12. Gaudemet, J. (1979), Les élections dans l'Eglise latine. Des origines au XVIe siècle. Paris: Ed. Fernand Lanore.
13. Geach, P. (1966) Kenny on practical reasoning, Analysis 26(3) January: 76-9.
14. Gilbert, M. (1996) Living together: rationality, sociality, and obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15. Hart, H.L.A. ([1961]1997) The Concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Mouchard, D. (2002) Politique déliberative et logique de mobilisation. Le cas d'Agir ensemble contre le chômage, Politix 57: 125-45.
17. Moulin, L. (1953) Les origines religieuses des techniques électorales et délibératives modernes, Revue internationale d'histoire politique et constitutionnelle, nouvelle série, 10 (avril-juin): 106-48.
18. Novak, S. (2009) L'ombre du consensus. Pratiques de la majorité qualifiée au Conseil de l'Union Européenne [Doctoral thesis in political science]. Paris: Institut d'Etudes Politiques.
19. Novak, S. (2010) 'Decision rules, social norms and the expression of disagreement: the case of qualified-majority voting in the Council of the European Union', Social science information 49(1): 81-95.
20. Oldenquist, A. (1967) Choosing, deciding and doing, in P. Edwards (ed.) Encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 2, pp. 96-104. New York: Collier-Macmillan.
21. Pasquino, P. (2007) Voter et délibérer, Revue européenne des sciences sociales XLV(136): 35-46.
22. Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. ([1958]1988) Traité de l'argumentation. Brussels: Editions de l'université de Bruxelles.
23. Raz, J. (1975) Reasons for action, decisions and norms, Mind 84 (336) October: 481-99.
24. Raz, J., ed. (1979) Practical reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Raz, J. (1990) Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Rousseau, J.-J. ([1762]1987) 'On the social contract', in The Basic political writings, transl. Donald A. Cress. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
27. Searle, J. (1995) The Construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
28. Steinberg, R. (2002) In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO, International organization 56(2): 339-74.
29. Steiner, J. & Dorff, R. (1980) Decision by interpretation: a new concept for an often overlooked decision mode, British journal of political science 10: 1-13.
30. Sunstein, C. (2007) Incompletely theorized agreements in constitutional law, Social research 74(1): 1-22.
31. Tuomela, R. (1991) We will do it: an analysis of group-intentions, Philosophy and phenomenological research LI (2) June: 249-77.
32. Ullmann, W. ([1961]2010) The Principles of government and politics in the Middle Ages. London: Routledge Revivals.
33. Urfalino, Ph. (2007) 'La décision par consensus apparent. Nature et propriétés', Revue européenne des sciences sociales: 34-59. [An earlier version of this text in English is available at: http://cesta.ehess.fr/document.php?id=126].
34. Urfalino, Ph. (2010) Sanior pars and maior pars in contemporary areopagus: medicine evaluation committees in France and United States, in J. Elster & H. Landemore (eds), Collective wisdom, forthcoming.