Leadership to build learning communities

Educational Forum

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 144-151

  Zepeda, Sally J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649258277     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131720408984621     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Acheson, K. A., and M. D. Gall. 1997. Techniques in lhe clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and in-service applications, 4th ed. New York: Longman.
2. Blase, J., and J. Blase. 1997. The fire is back! Principals sharing school governance. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.
3. Brookfield, S. D. 1986. Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. San Francisco, Calif.: jossey-Bass.
4. Brookfield, S. D. 1995. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
5. Crow, G. M., L. J. Matthews, and L. E. McCleary. 1996. Leadership: A relevant and realistic role for principals. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on Education.
6. Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press.
7. Glaser, B., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter Publishing.
8. Glickman, C. D., S. P. Gordon, and J. M. Ross-Gordon. 1998. Supervision of instruction: A deiwlopmental approach, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Guba, Y. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 29(2): 75-91.
10. Hill, R., T. Bullard, P. Capper, K. Hawes, and K. Wilson. 1998. Learning about learning organizations: Case studies of skill formation in five New Zealand organizations. Learning Organization 5(4): 184-92.
11. Hord, S. M. 1997. Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, Tex.: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
12. Jones, B. F., G. Valdez, J. Nowakowski, and C. Rasmussen. 1994. Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brook, III.: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
13. Kofman, F., and P Senge. 1993. Communities of commitments: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics 22(2): 5-23.
14. Lambert, L. 2003. Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15. Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
16. Oxley, D. 1997. Theory and practice of school communities. Educational Administration Quarterly 33(5): 624-13.
17. Senge, P. M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
18. Sergiovanni, T. J. 1994. Organizations or communities: Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly 30(2): 214-26.
19. Speck, M. and D. A. Stollenwerk. 1999. The principalship: Building a community. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
20. Sterling, M. 1998. Building a community week by week. Educational Leadership 56(1): 65-68.
21. Waite, D. 1995. Rethinking instructional supervision: Notes on its language and culture. London: Falmer Press.
22. Wald, P. J., and M. S. Castleberry, eds. 2000. Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23. Wick, C. W., and L. S. Leon. 1995. From idea to action: Creating a learning organization. Human Resource Management 34(2): 299-311.
24. Zepeda, S. J. 2000. Supervisory practices: Building a constructivist learning community for adults. In Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives, ed. J. Glanz and L. Behar-Horenstein, 93-107. Westport, Conn.: Bergin & Garvey