Artist Garret as growth machine? Local policy and artist housing in U.S. Cities

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 367-378

  Strom, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artist housing; Creative economy; Economic development policy; Subsidized municipal housing; Urban development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649248754     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X09358560     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alexander, V. 1996. Museums and money. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Americans for the Arts. 2008. Creative industries: Business and employment in the arts. www.americansforthearts.org.
3. Bradford, N. 2004. Creative cities structured dialogue backgrounder. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks. http://www.cprn.com/documents/31345_en.pdf (accessed October10, 2008).
4. Butler, J. 2005. Artspace project seeks viable site for artist housing. Northeast Pennsylvania Business Journal 20 (13): 21.
5. Cameron, S., and J. Coaffee. 2005. Art, gentrification and regeneration-From artist as pioneer to public arts. European Journal of Housing Policy 5 (1): 39-58.
6. Cunningham, S. 2007. Creative industries as policy and discourse outside the United Kingdom. Global Media and Communication 3:347-52.
7. Currid, E. 2007. How art and culture happens in urban economies: Implications for the economic development of culture. Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (4): 454-67.
8. Currid, E., and J. Connelly. 2008. Patterns of knowledge: The geography of advanced services and the case of arts and culture. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (2): 414-34.
9. DiMaggio, P., and M. Useem. 1978. Cultural democracy in a period of cultural expansion: The social composition of arts audiences in the United States. Social Problems 26 (2): 179-97.
10. Drake, G. 2003. This place gives me space: Place and creativity in the creative industries Geoforum 34 (4): 511-24.
11. Ewell, M.G. 2006. Cultural torchbearers of the community: Local arts agencies-Then and now. Monograph, Americans for the Arts, Washington, DC.
12. Farrelly, M.J. 2006. School districts offer housing subsidies to attract teachers. Voice of American News, May 8.
13. Fischler, M. 2007. Portrait of a village as an arts haven. New York Times, May 6, sec. 11, p. 8.
14. Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
15. Garnham, N. 2005. From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the creative industries' approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11:15-29.
16. Gootman, E. 2007. City will help pension plans build housing for teachers. New York Times, October5.
17. Grodach, C., and A. Loukaitou-Sideris. 2007. Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization: A survey of US cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (4): 349-70.
18. Hamnett, C., and N. Shoval. 2003. Museums as flagships of urban development. In Cities and visitors: Regulating people, markets, and city space, ed. L. M. Hoffman, D. Judd, and S. S. Fainstein. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Jeffri, J. 1998. Information on artists. New York: Research Center for Arts and Culture.
20. Jepson, E.J., Jr. 2004. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (3): 229-41.
21. Judd, D.R., W. Winter, W.R. Barnes, and E. Stern. 2003. Tourism and entertainment as local economic development: A national survey. In The infrastructure of play, ed. D. R. Judd, 50-76. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
22. Keyes, B. 2005. A housing start for the city's arts community. Port-land Press Herald, October16, p. E1.
23. Ley, D. 2003. Artists, aestheticization, and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies 40 (12): 2527-44.
24. Markusen, A., and D. King. 2003. The artistic dividend: The hidden contributions of the arts to the regional economy. Minneapolis: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota. http://www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/6158/artistic_dividend.pdf.
25. Markusen, A., and G. Schrock. 2006. The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development. Urban Studies 43 (10): 1661-86.
26. McGlinn, Eric. 2008. Salvation Army. New York Times Style Magazine. May 18.
27. National Endowment for the Arts. 1997. The geography of participation in the arts and culture. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
28. Nenno, Mary K. 1997. Changes and challenges in affordable housing and urban development. In Affordable housing and urban redevelopment in the united states, ed. Willem Van Vliet -, 1-22. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Peck, J. 2005. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Rural Research 29 (4): 740-70.
30. Perryman, M.R. 2001. The arts, culture, and the Texas economy. http://www.perrymangroup.com/.
31. Plaza, B. 2000. Evaluating the influence of a large cultural artifact in the attraction of tourism: The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao case. Urban Affairs Review 36 (2): 264-74.
32. Plaza, B. 2006. The return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 452-67.
33. Reinam, J. 2005. Creative space. Star Tribune, May 8, p. 1D.
34. Roney, M. 2007. Bohemian today, high rent tomorrow. Business Week, February 26.
35. Rosenbaum, L. 1997. Blockbusters, Inc-Three upstart art museums specialize in megashows. Art in America, June.
36. Saha, D., and R.G. Paterson. 2008. Local government efforts to promote the three Es of sustainable development. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28:21-37.
37. Sandrow, N. 2002. Center-stage living, at balcony rents. New York Times. June 9.
38. Schupbach, J. 2003. Artists downtown: Capitalizing on arts districts in New England. Master's thesis, MIT, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Cambridge, MA.
39. Schwartz, A.F. 2006. Housing policy in the United States. New York: Routledge.
40. Seideman, Tony. 2005. Crafting lofty ambitions. American City and County 120 (12): 64.
41. Sokol, B. 2008. Miami art machine. New York Magazine, April 27.
42. Strom, E. 2002. Converting pork into porcelain: Cultural institutions and downtown development. Urban Affairs Review 38 (1): 3-21.
43. Strom, E. 2003. Cultural policy as urban development policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (3): 247-63.
44. Strom, E. 2004. Old pictures in new frames: Issue definition and federal arts policy. Review of Policy Research 21 (4): 505-22.
45. Strom, E., and A. Cook. 2004. Old pictures in new frames: Issue definition and federal arts policy. Review of Policy Research 21 (4): 505-22.
46. Trescott, J. 2007. Museum math: Their number is multiplying. Washington Post, October7, p. R6.
47. Vale, L. 2000. From the Puritans to the projects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Winnie, T. 2007. How artists influence real estate prices. Nuwire Investor, September 18. www.nuwireinvestor.com.
49. Winzelberg, D. 2008. Artist colony proposed for Patchogue. Long Island Business News, April 25.
50. Wyszomirski, M.J. 1995. The politics of arts policy: Subgovernment to issue network. In America's commitment to culture, ed. K. V. Mulcahy and M. J. Wyszomirski, 11-31. Boulder, CO: Westview.
51. Zukin, S. 1982. Loft living. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.