State sadness reduces neural sensitivity to nonrewards versus rewards

NeuroReport

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-147

  Foti, Dan ^a   Hajcak, Greg ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotion; Event related potential; Feedback negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOOD; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; SADNESS; SELF REPORT; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPRESSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTION; EVOKED RESPONSE; MICROCLIMATE; MOTIVATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; ENVIRONMENT, CONTROLLED; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649239413     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283356448     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dunning JP, Hajcak G. Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss. Neuroreport 2007; 18:1875-1878.
2. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science (New York, NY) 2002; 295:2279-2282.
3. Hajcak G, Holroyd CB, Moser JS, Simons RF. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology 2005; 42:161-170.
4. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol 2006; 71:148-154.
5. Holroyd CB, Coles MG. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002; 109:679-709.
6. Miltner WH, Braun CH, Coled MGH. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9:788-798.
7. Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Talsma D, Coles MG, Holroyd CB, Kok A, et al. A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2002; 2:19-36.
8. Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. Neuroreport 2003; 14:2481-2484.
9. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:905-912.
10. Holroyd CB, Larsen JT, Cohen JD. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:245-253.
11. Holroyd CB, Hajcak G, Larsen JT. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Res 2006; 1105:93-101.
12. Foti D, Hajcak G. Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 2009; 81:1-8.
13. Pizzagalli DA, Iosifescu D, Hallett LA, Ratner KG, Fava M. Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task. J Psychiatr Res 2008; 43:76-87.
14. Davidson RJ. Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cogn Emotion 1998; 12:307-330.
15. Henriques JB, Davidson RJ. Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. J Abnorm Psychol 1990; 99:22-31.
16. Drevets WC. Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:813-829.
17. Drevets WC, Bogers W, Raichle ME. Functional anatomical correlates of antidepressant drug treatment assessed using PET measures of regional glucose metabolism. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2002; 12:527-544.
18. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Maual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
19. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. BrJ Clin Psychol 2005; 44:227-239.
20. Rottenberg J, Ray RD, Gross JJ. Emotion elicitation using films. In: Coan JJ, Allen JJB, editors. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 9-28.
21. Lang PJ. Self-assessment manikin. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 1980.
22. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484.
23. Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2005.
24. Scher CD, Ingram RE, Segal ZV. Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clin Psychol Rev 2005; 25:487-510.
25. Joormann J, Talbot L, Gotlib IH. Biased processing of emotional information in girls at risk for depression. J Abnorm Psychol 2007; 116:135-143.