Advancing a community psychology of men

American Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 201-211

  Watts, Roderick J ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fatherhood; Manhood; Masculinity; Men's development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FATHER; HUMAN; MALE; MASCULINITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

FATHERS; HUMANS; MALE; MASCULINITY; MEN; PARENTING; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77649238720     PISSN: 00910562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-009-9281-5     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abreu, J. M., Goodyear, R. K., Campos, A., & Newcomb, M. D. (2000). Ethnic belonging and traditional masculinity ideology among African Americans, European Americans and Latinos. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 75-86.
2. Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Worldviews in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7-40). New York: Wiley.
3. Bouchard, P., Boily, I., & Proulx, M. (2003). School success by gender: A catalyst for the masculinist discourse. Status of Women Canada, Research Branch. 123 Slater Street, Ottawa, ON, K1P 1H9. Available on-line: http://fathersforlife. org/doc/SoW-anti-male. zip.
4. Cantor, R., Kivel, P., Creighton, A., & Oakland Men's Project. (1992). Days of respect: Organizing a school-wide violence prevention program. Alameda, CA: Hunter House.
5. Farrell, W. (2001). The myth of male power. New York: Berkley Books.
6. French, S. (2003). Code of the warrior: Exploring warrior values past and present. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7. Gutmann, M. (1996). The meanings of macho: Being a man in Mexico City. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.
8. Hammond, W., & Mattis, J. (2005). Being a man about it: Manhood meaning among African American men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6(2), 114-126.
9. Kivel, P. (1990). The Oakland men's project. www. paulkivel. com.
10. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
11. Madison, S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Moore, R., & Gillette, D. (1990). King, warrior, magician, lover: Rediscovering the archetypes of the mature masculine. NY: Harper Collins.
13. Paechter, C. (2002). Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice. Women's Studies International Forum, 26, 69-77.
14. Society for Community Research and Action. (2009). Four broad principles guide SCRA. http://www. scra27. org/about~2.
15. Weatherford, D. (1998). A History of the American suffragist movement. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. Retrieved from http://www. suffragist. com/docs. htm.