Results and evaluation of 3 years of large scale mammography program in the Ariana state in Tunisia;Résultats et évaluation de 3 années de pratique mammographique à grande échelle dans le gouvernorat de l'Ariana en Tunisie

Tunisie Medicale

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 438-442

  Bouchlaka, A ^a   Ben Abdallah, M ^b   Ben Aissa, R ^a   Zaanouni, E ^a   Kribi, L ^a   Smida, S ^a   M'Barek, F ^a   Ben Hamida, A ^c   Boussen, H ^d   Gueddana, N ^a  

^a Office National de la Famille et de la Population   (Tunisia)

^b SALAH AZAIEZ INSTITUTE   (Tunisia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TUNIS EL MANAR   (Tunisia)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Evaluation; Mammography; Results; Screening; Tusnisia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; TUNISIA; BREAST TUMOR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TUNISIA;

EID: 77649223575     PISSN: 00414131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Registre Nord Tunisie données 1995-1998. Publication 200 Institut Salah Azaiez. Institut de la Santé Publique.
2. Maalej M, Hentati D, Messai T, Kochbati L, El May A, Mrad K, Romdhane KB, Ben Abdallah M, Zouari B. Breast cancer in Tunisia in 2004: a comparative clinical and epidemiological study. Bull cancer. 2008 ;95 :E5-9
3. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 3d. Ed. Reston, Va ; American College of Radiology, April 1998.
4. Europe Against Cancer. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening. European Commission. Third ed., 2001
5. Demissie K, Mills OF, Rhoads GG. Empirical comparison of the results of randomized controlled trails and case control studies in evaluating the effectiveness of screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 ; 51 :81-91
6. Hackshaw A. EUSOMA review of mammography screening Ann Oncol. 2003 ;14 :1193-5
7. Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2004 ;33 :43-55
8. Paty A.-C., Dr.Ancelle-Park R., Dr. Bloch J.. Dépistage du cancer du sein. Rapport d'évaluation du suivi épidémiologique. Données 2004. http://www.invs.sante.fr/publications/2007/cancer-sein/ index.html
9. Smith-Bindman R, Ballard-Barbash R, Miglioretti DL, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK. J Med Screen. 2005;12:50-4
10. Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek AL, de Koning HJ, Holland R. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 18;97:748-54
11. Harvey SC, Geller B, Oppenheimer RG, Pinet M, Riddell L, Garra B. Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 ;180 :1461-7