Priming bush and Iraq in 2008: A survey experiment

American Politics Research

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 372-394

  Cassino, Dan ^a   Erisen, Cengiz ^b  

^a FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2008 election; Barack Obama; George W. Bush; Priming; Rudolph Giuliani

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649214051     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X09346799     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1963). Computer simulation of hot cognition. In S. S. Tomkins, & S. Messick (Eds.), Computer simulation of personality (pp. 51-63). New York: Wiley.
2. Bargh, J.A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer, & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in lexical and semantic organization (pp. 21-74). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cassino, D. (2007). Just talking? The effects of open-ended answers on candidate evaluations. Paper presented at the 65th annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
5. Cassino, D., & Lodge, M. (2007). The primacy of affect in political cognition. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler, & M. D. Mackuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 101-123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Cassino, D., Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2007). Information processing and public opinion. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 48, 205-220.
7. Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
8. Collins, A.M., & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory, 8, 240-247.
9. Druckman, J. (1999). Who can frame? Source credibility and framing effects. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
10. Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.
11. Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H., & Quirk, P.J. (2006). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1-20.
12. Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W., & Sprague, J. (1999). Accessibility and the political utility of partisan and ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 888-911.
13. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
15. Krosnick, J.A. (1990). Expertise and political psychology. Social Cognition, 8, 1-8.
16. Krosnick, J.A. & Brannon, D.L.A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
17. Krosnick, J.A., & Kinder, D.R. (1990). Altering the support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
18. Lodge, M., McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.
19. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
20. Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1993). Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven process model of candidate evaluation. In S. Iyengar, & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 225-295). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. S. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 183-213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2001). Automatic affect: A test of hot cognition for candidates, groups, and issues. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
23. Lodge, M., & Taber, C.S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26, 455-482.
24. Loftus, E.F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
25. Miller, J.M., & Krosnick, J. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
26. Mutz, D. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 483-508.
27. Mutz, D. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Nelson, T.E., Clawson, R.A., & Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-584.
29. Nelson, T.E., & Kinder, D. (1996). Issue framing and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.
30. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett, & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 173-212). New York: Ablex.
31. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
32. Sniderman, P.M., & Hagendoorn, L. (2007). When ways of life collide: Multiculturalism and its discontent in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Sniderman, P.M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
34. Taber, C.S. (2003). Information processing and public opinion. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 433-476). London: Cambridge University Press.
35. Taylor, S.E., & Fiske, S.T. (1978). Salience, attention and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
36. Tourangeau, B., Rips, K.A., & Rasinski, L.J. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Valentino, N.A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
38. Young, J., Cynthia, J.T., Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., & Aldrich, J.H. (1991). When self-interest makes a difference: The role of construct accessibility in political reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(3), 271-296.
39. Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Zaller, J.R., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.