Demand-responsive lighting - A field study

LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 203-226

  Newsham, Guy ^a   Birt, Benjamin ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE CAMPUS; CONTROL MECHANISM; DEMAND RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY USE; FACILITIES MANAGEMENT; FIELD STUDIES; GRID STABILITY; LABORATORY STUDIES; LIGHTING CONTROLS; OPEN-PLAN OFFICES; POWER REDUCTIONS; SUMMER MONTHS;

OFFICE BUILDINGS;

LIGHTING;

EID: 77649210284     PISSN: 15502724     EISSN: 15502716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.06.03002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ADM Associates. 2007. Demand Response Technology Evaluation Mackenzie Laboratories. Southern California Edison Report.
2. [AEC] Architectural Energy Corporation. 2002. Demand responsive lighting systems URL:http://www.archenergy.com/lrp/demandresp-lighting.htm (last access:2009-07-22.)
3. Akashi Y, Neches J. 2004. Detectability and acceptability of illuminance reduction for load shedding. J Illum Eng Society. 33(1):3-13.
4. Akashi Y, Neches J. 2005. Potential recommendations for illuminance reductions by load shedding. Light Res Tech. 37(2):133-153.
5. [ASHRAE] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2004. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004. Atlanta (USA).
6. Boyce PR. 1984. Lighting control: the user's point of view. Proceedings of the CEA/DBR Symposium, Ottawa (Canada). p69-85.
7. DRCC. 2006. United States Demand Response Coordinating Committee. URL: http://www.demandresponsecommittee.org/ (last access:2009-07-22.)
8. Galasiu AD, Newsham GR, Suvagau C, Sander DM. 2007. Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: a field study. Leukos. 4(1):7-29. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc49498/nrcc49498. pdf (last access: 2009-07-27).
9. Granderson J, Agogino A. 2006. Intelligent office lighting: demand-responsive conditioning and increased user satisfaction. Leukos. 2(3):185-198. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc48678/ nrcc48678.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
10. [IEA] International Energy Agency. 2006. Light's labour's lost: policies for energy-efficient lighting. Paris (France).
11. [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2004. American national standard practice for office lighting. ANSI/IESNA-RP-1-04. New York (USA): IESNA.
12. [IESO] Independent Electricity System Operator. 2006. Ontario's Emergency Load Reduction Program (ELRP). URL: http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/elrp/elrp-index. asp (last access: 2009-07-22.
13. Kiliccote S, Piette MA, Watson DS, Hughes G. 2006. Dynamic controls for energy efficiency and demand response: framework concepts and a new construction study case in New York. In: Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Pacific Grove, CA. p3.172-3.183. URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/60615.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
14. Kirby BJ. 2003. Spinning reserve from responsive loads. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Tennessee (USA). ORNL/TM-2003/19. URL: http://certs.lbl. gov/pdf/spinning-reserves.pdf (last access: 2006-07-22).
15. Kryszczuk KM, Boyce PR. 2002. Detection of slow light level reduction. J Illum Eng Soc. 31: 3-10.
16. Lee ES, Selkowitz SE. 2006. The New York Times Headquarters daylighting mockup: monitored performance of the daylighting control system. Energy Build. 38(7):914-928.
17. National Grid. 2009. National Grid's lighting incentive and eligibility requirements manual for Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Nantucket customers, Design 2000plus Program. URL: http://www.nationalgridus.com/non-html/shared- energyeff-lighting-newconst.pdf (last access: 2009-07-27.)
18. Navigant, 2002. U.S. Lighting Market Characterization, Volume I: National Lighting Inventory and Energy Consumption Estimate. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program, September URL: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ publications/pdfs/ssl/lmc-vol1-final.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
19. Newsham G, Veitch J, Arsenault C, Duval C. 2004. Effect of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance. In: Proceedings of the IESNA Annual Conference. Tampa (USA). p19-41. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc47069/nrcc47069.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
20. Newsham GR, Mancini S. 2006. The Potential for demand responsive lighting in non-daylit offices. Leukos. 3(2):105-120. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc48678/nrcc48678.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
21. Newsham GR, Mancini S, Marchand RG. 2008. Detection and acceptance of demand-responsive lighting in offices with and without daylight. Leukos. 4(3):139-156. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc50324/ nrcc50324.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
22. Newsham GR, Mancini S, Veitch JA, Marchand RG, Lei W, Charles KE, Arsenault CD. 2009. Control strategies for lighting and ventilation in offices: effects on energy and occupants. Intell Build Int. 1(2):101-121. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc49249/nrcc49249.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
23. Piette MA, Watson DS, Motegi N, Bourassa N. 2005. Findings from the 2004 fully automated demand response tests in large facilities. Report for the PIER Demand Response Research Center. LBNL Report Number 58178. URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/58178.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22.)
24. PSEG. 2009. New Jersey Smart Start Buildings Program. URL: http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart- buildings/tools-and-resources/equipment-incentives/equi (last access: 2009-07-27).
25. Rosenzweig MB, Fraser H, Falk J, Voll SP. 2003. Market power and demand responsiveness: letting customers protect themselves. Electr J. 16(4):11-23.
26. Rowlands IH. 2005. Ontario demand response scenarios. CANMET Energy Technology Centre - Varennes, Natural Resources Canada. CETC 2005-139. URL: http://cetc-varennes.nrcan.gc.ca/fichier.php/codectec/En/2005-139/2005-139e.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
27. Rubinstein F, Kiliccote S. 2007. Demand Responsive Lighting: A Scoping Study. LBNL/DRRC Report LBNL-62226. URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/62226.pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).
28. SCE. 2005b. Demand Response Technology Evaluation Ganahl Lumber. Southern California Edison Report.
29. Shikakura T, Morikawa H, Nakamura Y. 2003. Perception of lighting fluctuation in office lighting environment. J Light Visual Environ. 27:15-22.
30. Tenner AD, Begemann SHA, van den Beld GJ. 1997. Acceptance and preference of illuminance in offices. In: Lux Europa'97, Proceedings of the 8th European Lighting Conference. Amsterdam (The Netherlands). p131-143.
31. Veitch JA, Gifford R. 1996. Choice, perceived control and performance decrements in the physical environment. J Environ Psych. 16:269-276.
32. Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 1998. Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction and comfort. J Illum Eng Soc. 27(1):107-129. URL: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc40663. pdf (last access: 2009-07-22).