Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: Comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Japanese Journal of Radiology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 95-100

  Nakajo, Kazuya ^a   Tatsumi, Mitsuaki ^a   Inoue, Atsuo ^a   Isohashi, Kayako ^a   Higuchi, Ichiro ^a   Kato, Hiroki ^a   Imaizumi, Masao ^a   Enomoto, Takayuki ^a   Shimosegawa, Eku ^a   Kimura, Tadashi ^a   Hatazawa, Jun ^a,b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fusion image; Gynecological malignant tumors; MRI; PET

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CANCER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERUS CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; OVARY; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 77649206249     PISSN: 18671071     EISSN: 1867108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-009-0387-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T.M. Blodgett C.C. Meltzer D.W. Townsend 2007 PET/CT: form and function Radiology 242 360 385 10.1148/radiol.2422051113 17255408 (Pubitemid 46150968)
2. P.G. Kluetz C.C. Meltzer V.L. Villemagne P.E. Kinahan S. Chander M.A. Martinelli, et al. 2000 Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: impact on patient management Clin Positron Imaging 3 223 230 10.1016/S1095-0397(01)00055-3 11378434
3. M.H. Pui Q.Y. Wang B. Xu G.P. Fan 2004 MRI of gynecological neoplasm Clin Imaging 28 143 152 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00116-5 15050230 (Pubitemid 38402062)
4. V. Nicolet L. Carignan F. Bourdon O. Prosmanne 2000 MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach Radiographics 20 1539 1549 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gt12qtw%3D%3D 11112809
5. I. Imaoka A. Wada Y. Kaji T. Hayashi M. Hayashi M. Matsuo, et al. 2006 Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses Radiographics 26 1431 1448 10.1148/rg.265045206 16973774 (Pubitemid 44518773)
6. A. Rosset L. Spadola O. Ratib X. Osiri 2004 An open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images J Digit Imaging 17 205 216 10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6 15534753 (Pubitemid 40378992)
7. S.H. Kim B.I. Choi J.K. Han H.D. Kim H.P. Lee S.B. Kang, et al. 1993 Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients J Comput Assist Tomogr 17 633 640 1:STN:280:DyaK3szit1GhtA%3D%3D 8331236
8. M.J. Varpula P.J. Klemi 1993 Staging of uterine endometrial carcinoma with ultra-low field (0.02 T) MRI: a comparative study with CT J Comput Assist Tomogr 17 641 647 10.1097/00004728-199307000-00023 1:STN:280: DyaK3szit1GhtQ%3D%3D 8331237
9. H. Hricak C. Gatsonis F.V. Coakley B. Snyder C. Reinhold L.H. Schwartz, et al. 2007 Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation: ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability Radiology 245 491 498 10.1148/radiol.2452061983 17940305 (Pubitemid 47612531)
10. A. Rieber K. Nussle I. Stohr D. Grab S. Fenchel R. Kreienberg, et al. 2001 Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 123 129 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MznsFKlsQ%3D%3D 11418411
11. S. Basu G. Li A. Alavi 2009 PET and PET-CT imaging of gynecological malignancies: present role and future promise Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9 75 96 10.1586/14737140.9.1.75 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFequ7jL 19105709
12. S.K. Kim H.J. Choi S.Y. Park H.Y. Lee S.S. Seo C.W. Yoo, et al. 2009 Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients Eur J Cancer 45 2103 2109 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.006 19403303
13. J.Y. Park E.N. Kim D.Y. Kim D.S. Suh J.H. Kim Y.M. Kim, et al. 2008 Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer Gynecol Oncol 108 486 492 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.044 18201753
14. K.R. Zasadny R.L. Wahl 1993 Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction Radiology 189 847 850 1:STN:280: DyaK2c%2Flt1Kiug%3D%3D 8234714
15. Y. Liu 2009 Benign ovarian and endometrial uptake on FDG PET-CT: patterns and pitfalls Ann Nucl Med 23 107 112 10.1007/s12149-008-0227-z 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXkvFKlsrY%3D 19225932
16. T.C. Yen L.C. See C.H. Lai C.S. Tsai A. Chao S. Hsueh, et al. 2008 Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35 493 501 10.1007/s00259-007-0612-1 17955238 (Pubitemid 351661674)
17. 18F]fluoro- 2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography Cancer 100 544 552 10.1002/cncr.11928 14745871 (Pubitemid 38124772)
18. O. Mawlawi J.J. Erasmus R.F. Munden T. Pan A.E. Knight H.A. Macapinlac, et al. 2006 Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 308 319 10.2214/AJR.04.1740 16423932 (Pubitemid 46100297)
19. K. Kitajima K. Murakami E. Yamasaki Y. Kaji I. Fukasawa N. Inaba, et al. 2008 Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/ contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35 1912 1920 10.1007/s00259-008-0890-2 18682935
20. M.S. Judenhofer C. Catana B.K. Swann S.B. Siegel W.I. Jung R.E. Nutt, et al. 2007 PET/MR images acquired with a compact MR-compatible PET detector in a 7-T magnet Radiology 244 807 814 10.1148/radiol.2443061756 17709830 (Pubitemid 47292092)
21. M. Imaizumi S. Yamamoto M. Kawakami M. Aoki 2009 Simultaneous imaging of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography by means of MRI-compatible optic fiber based PET: a validation study in ex vivo rat brain Jpn J Radiol 27 252 256 10.1007/s11604-009-0328-1 19626412