Biomechanical properties of jaw periosteum-derived mineralized culture on different titanium topography

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 831-841

  Att, Wael ^a,b   Kubo, Katsutoshi ^a,c   Yamada, Masahiro ^a   Maeda, Hatsuhiko ^a,c   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Machined surface; Mineralized tissue; Periosteal cells; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; SPP1 PROTEIN, RAT; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MINERALIZATION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; HARDNESS; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PERIOSTEUM; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOMECHANICS; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CALCIUM; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN TYPE I; DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; MANDIBLE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; PERIOSTEUM; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 77649194819     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 155-170.
2. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 597-607.
3. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 675-690.
4. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 163-174.
5. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 72: 296-305.
6. Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 200-210.
7. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1857-1863.
8. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4087-4103.
9. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 350-357.
10. Baker D, London RM, O’Neal R. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: A comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 722-728.
11. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 560-565.
12. Saruwatari L, Aita H, Butz F, et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro-and ultrastructure. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 2002-2016.
13. Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Kozloff K, Zysset PK, Brown MB, Goldstein SA. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone 2000; 26: 603-609.
14. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Goldstein SA. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1005-1012.
15. Zhang TY, Xu YH. Surface effects on nanoindentation. J Mater Res 2002; 17: 1715-1720.
16. Tenenbaum HC, Palangio KG, Holmyard DP, Pritzker KP. An ultrastructural study of osteogenesis in chick periosteum in vitro. Bone 1986; 7: 295-302.
17. Raisz LG. Studies on bone formation and resorption in vitro. Horm Res 1984; 20: 22-27.
18. Allen MR, Hock JM, Burr DB. Periosteum: Biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004; 35: 1003-1012.
19. Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M. Periosteal cells in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003; 9(suppl 1): S45-S64.
20. Ellender G, Feik SA, Carach BJ. Periosteal structure and development in a rat caudal vertebra. J Anat 1988; 158: 173-187.
21. Hohmann EL, Elde RP, Rysavy JA, Einzig S, Gebhard RL. Innervation of periosteum and bone by sympathetic vasoactive intestinal peptide-containing nerve fibers. Science 1986; 232: 868-871.
22. Breitbart AS, Grande DA, Kessler R, Ryaby JT, Fitzsimmons RJ, Grant RT. Tissue engineered bone repair of calvarial defects using cultured periosteal cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 567-574.
23. Schantz JT, Hutmacher DW, Chim H, Ng KW, Lim TC, Teoh SH. Induction of ectopic bone formation by using human periosteal cells in combination with a novel scaffold technology. Cell Transplant 2002; 11: 125-138.
24. Bord S, Horner A, Beavan S, Compston J. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta are differentially expressed in developing human bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 2309-2314.
25. Horiuchi K, Amizuka N, Takeshita S, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel protein, periostin, with restricted expression to periosteum and periodontal ligament and increased expression by transforming growth factor beta. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1239-1249.
26. Lee TM, Chang E, Yang CY. Attachment and proliferation of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblasts on Ti6Al4V: Effect of surface chemistries of the alloy. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 23-32.
27. Kim MJ, Kim CW, Lim YJ, Heo SJ. Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 79: 1023-1032.
28. Schimming R, Schmelzeisen R. Tissue-engineered bone for maxillary sinus augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 724-729.
29. Schmelzeisen R, Schimming R, Sittinger M. Making bone: Implant insertion into tissue-engineered bone for maxillary sinus floor augmentation-A preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 34-39.
30. Wennerberg A. Implant design and surface factors. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16(suppl): 45-47.
31. Dieudonne SC, van den Dolder J, de Ruijter JE, et al. Osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on silica gel and sol-gel-derived titania. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 3041-3051.
32. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacelement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992; 7: 1564-1583.
33. Hengsberger S, Kulik A, Zysset P. Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions. Bone 2002; 30: 178-184.
34. Aubin JE, Heersche NMJ. Osteoprogenitor cell differentiation to mature bone-forming osteoblasts. Drug Dev Res 2000: 206-215.
35. Nakahara H, Bruder SP, Goldberg VM, Caplan AI. In vivo osteochondrogenic potential of cultured cells derived from the periosteum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(259): 223-232.
36. Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrixrelated gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 241-247.
37. Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 566-570.
38. Alborzi A, Mac K, Glackin CA, Murray SS, Zernik JH. Endochondral and intramembranous fetal bone development: Osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist, and histone H4. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1996; 16: 94-106.
39. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Schuler M, Spencer ND. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2175-2182.
40. Matsuzaka K, Walboomers XF, Yoshinari M, Inoue T, Jansen JA. The attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells on microtextured surfaces. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2711-2719.
41. Gough JE, Notingher I, Hench LL. Osteoblast attachment and mineralized nodule formation on rough and smooth 45S5 bioactive glass monoliths. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 68: 640-650.
42. Stein GS, Lian JB. Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. Endocr Rev 1993; 14: 424-442.
43. Siddhanti SR, Quarles LD. Molecular to pharmacologic control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Biochem 1994; 55: 310-320.
44. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990; 143: 420-430.
45. Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 683-692.
46. Pharr GM, Oliver W, Brontzen F. On the generalty of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J Mater Res 1992; 7: 613-617.
47. Kubo K, Att W, Yamada M, et al. Microtopography of titanium suppresses osteoblastic differentiation but enhances chondroblastic differentiation of rat femoral periosteum-derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87: 380-391.
48. Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 17-29.