Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-28

  Sampaio Góes, João Carlos ^a  

^a NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast augmentation; Breast implants; Cohesive gel breast implant; Complications; Rotation; Subfascial implantation

Indexed keywords

SILICONE GEL;

ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SILICONE GELS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77649192419     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9429-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. WP Adams Jr 2003 Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation Plast Reconstr Surg 111 2110 2111 10.1097/01.PRS.0000057704. 93273.17 12711986
2. Adams WP Jr, Potter JK (2005) Breast implants: materials and manufacturing past, present and future. In: Spear S, Willey SC, Robb GL, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 424-437
3. JL Baeke 2002 Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2555 2564 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00060 12045592
4. FE Barone L Perry T Keller GP Maxwell 1992 The biomechanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion Plast Reconstr Surg 90 77 86 10.1097/00006534-199207000-00012 1:STN:280:DyaK38zhtFaqsg%3D%3D 1615095
5. BP Bengtson BW Van Natta DK Murphy A Slicton GP Maxwell for the Style 410 US Core Clinical Study Group 2007 Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years Plast Reconstr Surg 120 40S 48S 10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVCmsLvF 18090813 (Pubitemid 350306657)
6. S Bern A Burd JW May Jr 1992 The biophysical and histologic properties of capsules formed by smooth and textured silicone implants in the rabbit Plast Reconstr Surg 89 1037 1042 1:STN:280:DyaK383mt1Gruw%3D%3D 1584865
7. RR Brink 1996 Sequestered fluid and breast implant malposition Plast Reconstr Surg 98 679 684 10.1097/00006534-199609001-00012 1:STN:280: DyaK28zmvFOmsg%3D%3D 8773690
8. MH Brown R Shenker SA Silver 2005 Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 116 768 779 10.1097/01.prs.0000176259.66948.e7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkt1Kquw%3D%3D 16141814 (Pubitemid 41279381)
9. BR Burkhardt CP Demas 1994 The effect of Siltex texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline inflatable breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 93 123 128 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7gsFamtQ%3D%3D 8278467
10. PA Clugston LC Perry DC Hammond GP Maxwell 1994 A rat model for capsular contracture: the effects of surface texturing Ann Plast Surg 33 595 599 10.1097/00000637-199412000-00005 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7osFOltQ%3D%3D 7880048 (Pubitemid 24379365)
11. PA Cross 2003 Double capsule or capsule within a capsule: is there a difference? Br J Plast Surg 56 76 12706168
12. B Cunningham 2007 The Mentor study on contour profile gel silicone MemoryGel breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 120 33S 39S 10.1097/01.prs. 0000286665.91043.bc 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVCmsLvL 18090812 (Pubitemid 350306656)
13. AM Danino P Basmacioglu S Saito F Rocher C Blanchet-Bardon M Revol JM Servant 2001 Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study Plast Reconstr Surg 108 2047 2052 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00032 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpsFertA%3D%3D 11743398
14. BH Fruhstorfer EL Hodgson CM Malata 2004 Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery Ann Plast Surg 53 536 542 10.1097/01.sap.0000134508. 43550.6f 15602249 (Pubitemid 39565024)
15. JC Goes A Landecker 2003 Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane Aesthetic Plast Surg 27 178 184 10.1007/s00266-003-0004-2 12925857 (Pubitemid 37541704)
16. M Hahn RP Kuner P Scheler K Freidel G Hoffmann H Madjar D Wallwiener U Krainick-Strobel 2008 Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implant-capsule interaction ("interface") in anatomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell surface Ultraschall Med 29 4 399 404 10.1055/s-2007-963020 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1critVCmtw%3D%3D 17610178
17. P Hedén J Jernbeck M Hober 2001 Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience Clin Plast Surg 28 531 552 11471959
18. P Hedén MB Nava J van Tetering G Magalon R Fourie le RJ Brenner LE Lindsey DK Murphy PS Walker 2006 Prevalence of rupture in Inamed silicone breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 118 303 308 10.1097/01.prs.0000233471.58039. 30 16874191 (Pubitemid 44162028)
19. C Heitmann C Schreckenberger RR Olbrisch 1998 A silicone implant filled with cohesive gel: advantages and disadvantages Eur J Plast Surg 21 329 332 10.1007/s002380050110 (Pubitemid 28458494)
20. INAMED silicone-filled breast implants directions for use, smooth & BIOCELL texture. Allergan, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, 2006
21. Institute of Medicine (2000) Reoperations and specific local and perioperative complications. In: Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R (eds) Safety of silicone breast implants. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 114-178
22. I Kulmala JK McLaughlin M Pakkanen K Lassila LR Holmich L Lipworth JD Boice Jr J Raitanen R Luoto 2004 Local complications after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Finland Ann Plast Surg 53 413 419 10.1097/01.sap.0000131275. 62449.c8 15502454 (Pubitemid 39425743)
23. Maxwell GP, Baker MB (2005) Augmentation mammaplasty: general considerations. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1237-1260
24. Maxwell GP, Hammond DC (1993) Breast implants: smooth vs. textured. In: Habal MB, Woods JE, Morain WD, Parsons RW (eds) Advances in plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol 9. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St Louis, MO, pp 209-220
25. Mentor MemoryGel Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants [package insert]. Mentor, Santa Barbara, CA, 2006
26. I Niechajev G Jurell L Lohjelm 2007 Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation Aesthetic Plast Surg 31 697 710 10.1007/s00266-006-0057-0 17653683 (Pubitemid 350159939)
27. AN Pandya MG Dickson 2002 Capsule within a capsule: an unusual entity Br J Plast Surg 55 455 456 10.1054/bjps.2002.3864 12372386 (Pubitemid 34993902)
28. P Panettiere L Marchetti D Accorsi 2004 Rotation of anatomic prostheses: a possible cause of breast deformity Aesthetic Plast Surg 28 348 353 10.1007/s00266-004-0068-7 15529202 (Pubitemid 40228416)
29. W Peters 2000 Current status of breast implant survival properties and the management of the woman with silicone gel breast implants Can J Plast Surg 8 54 67
30. SL Spear JL Baker Jr 1995 Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 96 1119 1123 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FhvV2rsA%3D%3D 7568488
31. SL Spear P Heden 2007 Allergan's silicone gel breast implants Expert Rev Med Devices 4 699 708 10.1586/17434440.4.5.699 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVejtrvJ 17850205 (Pubitemid 47496697)
32. JB Tebbetts 2000 Patient acceptance of adequately filled breast implants using the tilt test Plast Reconstr Surg 106 139 147 10.1097/00006534-200007000- 00027 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czjvVKrtA%3D%3D 10883627
33. JB Tebbetts 2002 Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part I. Refining practices by using motion and time study principles Plast Reconstr Surg 109 273 290 10.1097/00006534- 200201000-00044 11786826
34. JB Tebbetts 2006 Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes Plast Reconstr Surg 118 53S 80S 10.1097/01.prs.0000247314.92351.99 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXms1alsw%3D%3D 17099484 (Pubitemid 44747132)
35. VL Young ME Watson 2001 Breast implant research: where we have been, where we are, where we need to go Clin Plast Surg 28 451 483 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlKnsA%3D%3D 11471955 vi