Review of 1,447 breast augmentation patients using perthese silicone implants

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 11-15

  Psillakis, Jorge Miguel ^a,c   Facchina, Paulo Henrique ^a   Kharmandayan, Paulo ^a   Trillo, Luis ^a   Canzi, Waldecir Chiarelo ^b   Aguiar, Herberti Rosique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Canzi Plastic Surgery Clinic   (Brazil)

^c Rua Helena   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast augmentation; Breast implants; Breast surgery; Capsular contraction; Mammary implants; Silicone implants; Silicone prosthesis

Indexed keywords

SILICONE GEL;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BRAZIL; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILICONE GELS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77649189598     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9405-1     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. PERTHESE [package insert]. Bornel, France: Groupe PEROUSE PLASTIE, 1999
2. E Auclair S Staub 2005 Round and anatomical mammary implants. Respective advantages and disadvantages Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50 505 516 10.1016/j.anplas.2005.08.007 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrkvFeisA%3D%3D 16198469 (Pubitemid 41463444)
3. MH Brown R Shenker SA Silver 2005 Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 116 3 768 779 10.1097/01.prs.0000176259.66948.e7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkt1Kquw%3D%3D 16141814 (Pubitemid 41279381)
4. P Hedén B Boné DK Murphy A Slicton PS Walker 2006 Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation Plast Reconstr Surg 118 6 1281 1287 10.1097/01.prs. 0000239457.17721.5d 17051096 (Pubitemid 44610375)
5. BP Bengtson BW Van Natta DK Murphy A Slicton GP Maxwell 2007 Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years Plast Reconstr Surg 120 7 Suppl 1 40S 48S 10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVCmsLvF 18090813 (Pubitemid 350306657)
6. I Niechajev G Jurell L Lohjelm 2007 Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation Aesthetic Plast Surg 31 697 710 10.1007/s00266-006-0057-0 17653683 (Pubitemid 350159939)
7. B Cunningham J McCue 2009 Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years Aesthetic Plast Surg 33 440 444 10.1007/s00266-009-9364-6 19437068
8. SL Spear DK Murphy A Slicton PS Walker 2007 Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years Plast Reconstr Surg 120 7 Suppl 1 8S 16S 10.1097/01.prs.0000286580.93214.df 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVCmsLrF 18090808 (Pubitemid 350306652)
9. BH Fruhstorfer ELB Hodgson CM Malata 2004 Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery Ann Plast Surg 53 536 542 10.1097/01.sap.0000134508. 43550.6f 15602249 (Pubitemid 39565024)