A Multi-state model of state dependence in labor supply: Intertemporal labor supply effects of a shift from joint to individual taxation

Labour Economics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 323-335

  Haan, Peter ^a,b  

^a DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

^b IZA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Joint and individual taxation; Labor supply of married women; Panel data; True state dependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649187921     PISSN: 09275371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bargain O., Caliendo M., Haan P., and Orsini K. "'Making Work Pay' in a Rationed Labour Market". Journal of Population Economics 21 (2010) 323-351
2. Blundell R., Ham J., and Meghir C. Unemployment and female labour supply. Economic Journal 97 (1987) 44-64
3. Bound J., Brown C., Duncan G., and R. W. Evidence on the validity of cross-sectional and longitudinal labor market data. Journal of Labor Economics 12 3 (1994) 345-368
4. Chamberlain G. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (1980) 225-238
5. Chiappori P. Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992) 437-467
6. Croda E., and Kyriazidou E. Intertemporal Labor Force Participation of Married Women in Germany: a Panel Data Analysis," Discussion paper (2005)
7. Eckstein Z., and Wolpin K. Dynamic labour force participation of married women and endogenous wage growth. Review of Economic Studies 56 (1989) 375-390
8. Haan P., Prowse V., and Uhlendorff A. Employment Effects of Welfare Reforms: Evidence from a Dynamic Structural Life-Cycle Model," IZA Discussion Paper, 3480 (2008)
9. Haisken De-New J., and Frick J. Desktop Compendium to The German Socio- Economic Panel Study (SOEP) (2005), DIW, Berlin
10. Heckman J. Heterogeneity and STATE DEPENDENCE. In: Rosen S. (Ed). Studies in Labor Markets (1981), Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 91-139
11. Heckman J. The incedental parameter problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In: Manski C., and McFadden D. (Eds). Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 179-195
12. Heckman J. What has been learned about the labor supply in the past twenty years. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 83 (1993) 116-121
13. Heckman J., and Singer B. A method for minimizing the distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52 (1984) 271-320
14. Honore B., and Kyriazidou E. Panel data discrete choice models with lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 68 (2000) 839-874
15. Hyslop D. State dependence, serial correlation and heterogeneity in intertemporal labor force participation of married women. Econometrica 67 (1999) 1255-1294
16. Kroh M., and Spieβ M. Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2007) (2008), DIW, Berlin Data Documentation 39
17. Laroque G., and Salanie B. Labour market institutions and employment in France. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7 (2002) 25-48
18. Lee M., and Tae Y. Analysis of labour participation behaviour of Korean women with dynamic probit and conditional logit. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 1 (2005) 71-91
19. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1974), Academic Press, New York
20. Michaud P., and Vermeulen F. A Collective Retirement Model: Identification and Estimation in the Presence of Externalities," IZA Discussion-Paper, 1294 (2004)
21. Michaud P., and Tatsiramos K. Fertility and Female Employment Dynamics in Europe: The Effect of Using Alternative Econometric Modeling Assumptions," IZA Discussion- Paper, 3853 (2008)
22. Mroz T. The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women's hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica 55 (1987) 765-799
23. Prowse V. Modeling employment dynamics with state dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. University of Oxford, Department of Economcis Working Paper (2007) 337
24. Skrondal A., and Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized Latent Variable Modeling (2004), Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida
25. Steiner V., and Wrohlich K. Household taxation, income splitting and labor supply incentives. a microsimulation study for Germany. CESifo Economic Studies 50 (2004) 41-568
26. Steiner V., Wrohlich K., Haan P., and Geyer J. Documentation of the tax-benefit microsimulation model STSM: Version 2008 (2008), DIW, Berlin Data Documentation 31
27. Train K. Discrete Choice Models using Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
28. Uhlendorff A. "From No Pay to Low Pay and Back Again? A Multi-State Model of Low Pay Dynamics," DIW-Discussion Paper (2006) 648
29. Verbeek M., and Nijman T. Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. International Economic Review 33 3 (1992) 681-703
30. Wooldridge J. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002), The MIT Press
31. Wooldridge J. Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem for dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (2005) 39-54
32. Wrohlich K. "Labor Supply and Child Care Choices in a Rationed Child Care Market," IZA Discussion-Paper (2006) 2053