Leading from the Middle of the Organization: An Examination of Shared Leadership in Academic Libraries

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-157

  Cawthorne, Jon E ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649185566     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ancona D.G., Malone T.W., Orlikowski W.J., and Senge P.M. In praise of the incomplete leader. Harvard Business Review 85 2 (2007) 92-100
2. Pearce C.L., and Conger J.A. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
3. Ibid, p. 3.
4. Middle managers an in include lower executives and employees who manage supervisors overseeing day-to-day operations.
5. Jonathan F. Cox, Craig L. Pearce, and Monica L. Perry, Toward a Model of Shared Leadership and Distributed Influence in the Innovation Process: How Shared Leadership Can Enhance New Product Development, Team Dynamics, and Effectiveness, In Shared Leadership, pp. 48-68.
6. Sue Baughman, Johnnie Love, and Maggie Saponaro, "Shared Leadership Development in the UM Libraries (Working Paper 7, 2005). Available at http://www.lib.umd.edu/groups/learning/WP7.html (accessed November 29, 2008).
7. Follett M.P. Creative Experience (1924), Longmans, Green, New York
8. Barnard C.I. The Functions of the Executive (1938), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Drucker P.F. The Essential Drucker (2001), Harper-Collins, New York
10. Bruce Avolio, Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam, William D. Murray, Don Jung, and John Garger, Assessing Shared Leadership: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, in Shared Leadership, pp. 143-72.
11. Pearce, and Conger, Shared Leadership.
12. Solomon A., Loeffer F.J., and Frank G.H. An Analysis of Co-therapist Interaction in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 3 (1953) 171-180
13. Hollander E.P. Some Effects of Perceived Status on Responses to Innovative Behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 63 (1961) 247-250
14. Bowers D.G., and Seashore S.E. Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four Factor Theory of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly 11 (1966) 238-263
15. Manz C.C., and Sims H.P. Self-management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective. Academy of Management Review 5 (1980) 361-367
16. Pearce and Conger, Shared Leadership.
17. Kelly R.E. In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review 66 6 (1988) 141-148
18. Conger J.A., and Kanungo R.N. The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. The Academy of Management Review 13 (1988) 639-652
19. Pearce, and Conger, Shared Leadership.
20. Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E., and Converse S. Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision Making. In: Castellan Jr. N.J. (Ed). Individual and Group Decision Making (1993), Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ 221-243
21. Ensley M.D., and Pearce C.L. Shared Cognition in Top Management Teams: Implications for New Venture Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2001) 145-160
22. Klimoski R., and Mohammed S. Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor. Journal of Management 20 (1994) 404-437
23. Lipman-Blumen J. The Connective Edge (1966), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
24. Pearce, and Conger, Shared leadership.
25. Bligh M.C., Pearce C.L., and Kohles J.C. The Importance of Self- and Shared Leadership in Team Based Knowledge Work. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21 (2006) 296-318
26. Elizabeth Ann Broyles, Resistance to Change in Conservative, Hierarchical Religious Organizations: A Study of Roman Catholic Parishes Shifting from a Top-down to a Shared Leadership Governance Model. Ed.D. diss. (University of La Verne, 2007). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3290066).
27. Michael Shane Wood, The Effects of Shared Leadership on the Stress and Satisfaction Outcomes of Church Management Team Members. Ph.D. diss. (Regent University, 2005). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3162680).
28. Tova Olson Sanders, Collectivity and Influence: The Nature of Shared Leadership and Its Relationship with Team Learning Orientation, Vertical Leadership and Team Effectiveness. Ed.D. diss. (The George Washington University, 2006). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3237041).
29. Margaret Grogan, Developing Shared Leadership through Community Conversation. M.A. diss. (Royal Roads University, 2008). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT MR35551).
30. Joaquin Manuel Angles, The Impact of Shared Leadership on the Effectiveness of Self-managed Work Teams: A Phenomenological Study. D.M. diss. (University of Phoenix, 2007). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3277198).
31. Erika Engel Small, Shared Leadership: A Social Network Analysis. Ph.D. diss. (The University of Tennessee, 2007). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3286953).
32. H. J. Thompson, An Exploration of the Relationship between the Practice of Shared Leadership and Board Effectiveness within the Rural Boards of the Public Colleges of Alberta. Ed.D. diss. (University of Calgary, 2008). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT NR38047).
33. Christopher Stephen Elliott, Leadership without Bosses: Shared Leadership in a Mmulti Organizational Context. Ph.D. diss. (University of Alberta (Canada), 1993). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT NN88327).
34. Dennis M. Cashman, The Effects of Vertical Leadership, Team Demographics, and Group Potency upon Shared Leadership Emergence within Technical Organizations. Ph.D. diss. (Capella University, 2008). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3320543).
35. Sanghan Choi, A Conceptual Model of the Emergence of Shared Leadership: The Effects of Organizational Structure, Culture, and Context Variables on Public Employee Perceptions of Leadership. Ph.D. diss. (Florida Atlantic University, 2006). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3222084).
36. Cashman, The Effects of Vertical Leadership, Team Demographics, and Group Potency upon Shared Leadership Emergence within Technical Organizations.
37. Michael Shane Wood, The Effects of Shared Leadership on the Stress and Satisfaction Outcomes of Church Management Team Members, Ph.D. diss. (Regent University, 2005). Available from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database (AAT 3162680).
38. Mumford T.V., Campion M.A., and Morgeson F.P. The Leadership Skills Strataplex: Leadership Skill Requirements Across Organizational Levels. Leadership Quarterly 18 (2007) 154-166
39. Jackson S. A Qualitative Evaluation of the Shared Leadership Barriers, Drivers and Recommendations. Journal of Management in Medicine 14 3-4 (2000) 166-178
40. Ibid, p. 169.
41. Porter-O'Grady T., Hawkins M.A., and Parker M.L. Whole-systems Shared Governance (1997), Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD
42. Franklin B. Beyond Shared Leadership: The Importance of Learning in a Shared Leadership Model. College & Research Libraries News 60 (1999) 22-23
43. Jenny Raubenheimer and Helene Müller, "Rethinking Leadership Roles for the Academic Library: The Attitudes of Library Staff towards a Leadership-driven Academic Information Service Enterprise" (2006). Available at http://etd.unisa.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-04052005-111943/unrestricted/Thesis.PDF (accessed October 28, 2008).
44. According to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, these are institutions that award fifty master's degrees and fewer than twenty doctoral degrees per year.
45. COLD serves as advisory group to the Associate Vice Provost for Information and Technology within the California State University (CSU) Chancellor's office. Sixteen of the twenty-two institutions are members of the CSU System.
46. Lars Kaczmirek, Web Surveys: A Brief Guide on Usability and Implementation Issues (2005). Available at http://www.websm.org (accessed September 30, 2007).
47. With the proliferation of spam e-mails, the subject line text turned out to influence whether or not participants ultimately received the e-mail.
48. At least one person from each institution completed the survey.
49. Pearce, and Conger, Shared Leadership.