Habitat use by western black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus) in coastal British Columbia: Evidence of facultative group living

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 334-346

  Salomon, Maxence ^a,b   Vibert, Samantha ^a   Bennett, Robert G ^c  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c RESEARCH BRANCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING SEASON; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GROUP BEHAVIOR; HABITAT USE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INVASIVE SPECIES; OVIPOSITION; SPIDER;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; LATRODECTUS; LATRODECTUS HESPERUS; TEGENARIA; TEGENARIA AGRESTIS;

EID: 77649168188     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z10-004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agnarsson, I. 2004. Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 141(4): 447-626. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00120.x.
2. Avilés, L. 1997. Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent sociality in spiders. In The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Edited by J. Choe and B.J. Crespi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 476-498.
3. Avilés, L., and Tufiño, P. 1998. Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Am. Nat. 152(3): 403-418. doi:10.1086/286178. PMID:18811448.
4. Berenbaum, M.R., Green, E.S., and Zangerl, A.R. 1993. Web costs and web defense in the parsnip webworm (Lepidoptera, Oecophoridae). Environ. Entomol. 22(4): 791-795.
5. Bertani, R., Fukushima, C.S., and Martins, R. 2008. Sociable widow spiders? Evidence of subsociality in Latrodectus Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Ethol. 26(2): 299-302. doi:10.1007/s10164-007-0082-8.
6. Bilde, T., and Lubin, Y. 2001. Kin recognition and cannibalism in a subsocial spider. J. Evol. Biol. 14(6): 959-966. doi:10.1046/j. 1420-9101.2001.00346.x.
7. Blackledge, T.A., Coddington, J.A., and Gillespie, R.G. 2003. Are three-dimensional spider webs defensive adaptations? Ecol. Lett. 6(1): 13-18. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00384.x.
8. Bono, J.M., and Crespi, B.J. 2008. Cofoundress relatedness and group productivity in colonies of social Dunatothrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) on Australian Acacia. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62(9): 1489-1498. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0578-4.
9. Costa, J.T., and Pierce, N.E. 1997. Social evolution in the Lepidoptera: ecological context and communication in larval societies. In The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Edited by J. Choe and B.J. Crespi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 407-442.
10. Edgerly, J.S. 1994. Is group living an antipredator defense in a facultatively communal webspinner (Embiidina: Clothodidae)? J. Insect Behav. 7(2): 135-147. doi:10.1007/BF01990076.
11. Edgerly, J.S., Shenoy, S.M., and Werner, V.G. 2006. Relating the cost of spinning silk to the tendency to share it for three embiids with different lifestyles (order Embiidina: Clothodidae, Notoligotomidae, and Australembiidae). Environ. Entomol. 35(2): 448-457. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-35.2.448.
12. Evans, T.A. 1999. Kin recognition in a social spider. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266(1416): 287-292. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999. 0635.
13. Fletcher, L.E. 2007. Vibrational signals in a gregarious sawfly larva (Perga affinis): group coordination or competitive signaling? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61(12): 1809-1821. doi:10.1007/ s00265-007-0414-2.
14. Frank, S.A. 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature (London), 377(6549): 520-522. doi:10.1038/377520a0. PMID:7566147.
15. Furey, R.E. 1998. Two cooperatively social populations of the theridiid spider Anelosimus studiosus in a temperate region. Anim. Behav. 55(3): 727-735. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0648. PMID: 9515053.
16. Hodge, M.A., and Storfer-Isser, A. 1997. Conspecific and heterospecific attraction: a mechanism of web site selection. Ethology, 103(10): 815-826.
17. Hodge, M.A., and Uetz, G.W. 1995. A comparison of agonistic behaviour of colonial web-building spiders from desert and tropical habitats. Anim. Behav. 50(4): 963-972. doi:10.1016/00033472(95)80097-2.
18. Jakob, E.M. 1991. Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk. Anim. Behav. 41(4): 711-722. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80908-X.
19. Jakob, E.M. 2004. Individual decisions and group dynamics: why pholcid spiders join and leave groups. Anim. Behav. 68(1): 920. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.026.
20. Jones, T.C., and Parker, P.G. 2000. Costs and benefits of foraging associated with delayed dispersal in the spider Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae, Theridiidae). J. Arachnol. 28(1): 61-69. doi:10.1636/0161-8202(2000)028[0061:CABOFA]2.0.CO;2.
21. Jones, T.C., Riechert, S.E., Dalrymple, S.E., and Parker, P.G. 2007. Fostering model explains variation in levels of sociality in a spider system. Anim. Behav. 73(1): 195-204. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.006.
22. Kaston, B.J. 1970. Comparative biology of American black widow spiders. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 16(3): 33-82.
23. Krause, J., and Ruxton, G.D. 2002. Living in groups. Oxford series in ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif.
25. Lloyd, N.J., and Elgar, M.A. 1997. Costs and benefits of facultative aggregating behaviour in the orb-spinning spider Gasteracantha minax Thorell (Araneae: Araneidae). Aust. J. Ecol. 22(3): 256-261. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00670.x.
26. Lubin, Y., and Bilde, T. 2007. The evolution of sociality in spiders. Adv. Stud. Behav. 37: 83-145. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37003-4.
27. Mori, K., and Saito, Y. 2004. Nest-size variation reflecting antipredator strategies in social spider mites of Stigmaeopsis (Acari: Tetranychidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56(3): 201-206. doi:10. 1007/s00265-004-0776-7.
28. Morrell, L.J., and Romey, W.L. 2008. Optimal individual positions within animal groups. Behav. Ecol. 19(4): 909-919. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn050.
29. Palomares, F., and Delibes, M. 1993. Social organization in the Egyptian mongoose: group size, spatial behaviour and inter-individual contacts in adults. Anim. Behav. 45(5): 917-925. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1111.
30. Pasquet, A., and Krafft, B. 1989. Colony distribution of the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) in French Guyana. Insectes Soc. 36(3): 173-182. doi:10.1007/BF02226302.
31. Pekár, S., Hrušková, M., and Lubin, Y. 2005. Can solitary spiders (Araneae) cooperate in prey capture? J. Anim. Ecol. 74(1): 6370. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00897.x.
32. Prokopy, R.J., and Roitberg, B.D. 2001. Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46(1): 631-665. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.631. PMID:11112182.
33. Queller, D.C., Zacchi, F., Cervo, R., Turillazzi, S., Henshaw, M.T., Santorelli, L.A., and Strassmann, J.E. 2000. Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature (London), 405(6788): 784-787. doi:10. 1038/35015552. PMID:10866197.
34. Rayor, L.S., and Uetz, G.W. 1990. Trade-offs in foraging success and predation risk with spatial position in colonial spiders. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27(2): 77-85. doi:10.1007/BF00168449.
35. Reeve, H.K. 1989. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am. Nat. 133(3): 407-435. doi:10.1086/284926.
36. Reitz, S.R., and Trumble, J.T. 2002. Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47(1): 435-465. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145227. PMID: 11729081.
37. Riechert, S.E., and Jones, T.C. 2008. Phenotypic variation in the social behaviour of the spider Anelosimus studiosus along a latitudinal gradient. Anim. Behav. 75(6): 1893-1902. doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2007.10.033.
38. Salomon, M. 2007. Western black widow spiders express statedependent web-building strategies tailored to the presence of neighbours. Anim. Behav. 73(5): 865-875. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.002.
39. Salomon, M. 2008. Facultative group living in the western black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus: an evolutionary approach. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.
40. Salomon, M. 2009. Social environment and feeding state influence movement decisions in a web-building spider. Ethology, 115(10): 916-927. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01682.x.
41. Schuck-Paim, C., and Alonso, W.J. 2001. Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata. Anim. Behav. 62(5): 1007-1012. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1841.
42. Sernland, E., Olsson, O., and Holmgren, N.M.A. 2003. Does information sharing promote group foraging? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270(1520): 1137-1141. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2352.
43. Sirot, E. 2000. An evolutionary stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups. Behav. Ecol. 11(4): 351-356. doi:10.1093/ beheco/11.4.351.
44. Smith, D.R. 1983. Ecological costs and benefits of communal behaviour in a presocial spider. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13(2): 107-114. doi:10.1007/BF00293800.
45. Smith, A.R., Wcislo, W.T., and O'Donnell, S. 2007. Survival and productivity benefits to social nesting in the sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61(7): 1111-1120. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0344-4.
46. Stamps, J.A. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am. Nat. 131(3): 329-347. doi:10.1086/284793.
47. Strassmann, J.E., and Queller, D.C. 1989. Ecological determinants of social evolution. In The genetics of social evolution. Edited by M.D. Breed and R.E. Page, Jr. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo. pp. 81-101.
48. Tanaka, K. 1989. Energetic cost of web construction and its effect on web relocation in the web-building spider Agelena limbata. Oecologia (Berl.), 81(4): 459-464. doi:10.1007/BF00378952.
49. Tietjen, W.J. 1986. Effects of colony size on web structure and behavior of the social spider Mallos gregalis (Araneae, Dictynidae). J. Arachnol. 14(2): 145-157.
50. Uetz, G.W., and Hieber, C.S. 1997. Colonial web-building spiders: balancing the costs and benefits of group-living. In The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Edited by J. Choe and B.J. Crespi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 458-475.
51. Valone, T.J., and Templeton, J.J. 2002. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357(1427): 1549-1557. doi:10. 1098/rstb.2002.1064. PMID:12495512.
52. Vetter, R.S., Roe, A.H., Bennett, R.G., Baird, C.R., Royce, L.A., Lanier, W.T., Antonelli, A.L., and Cushing, P.E. 2003. Distribution of the medically-implicated hobo spider (Araneae: Agelenidae) and a benign congener, Tegenaria duellica, in the United States and Canada. J. Med. Entomol. 40(2): 159-164. doi:10. 1603/0022-2585-40.2.159. PMID:12693843.
53. Whitehouse, M.E., and Lubin, Y. 2005. The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 80(3): 347-361. doi:10.1017/S1464793104006694. PMID:16094803.
54. Wise, D.H. 2006. Cannibalism, food limitation, intraspecific competition, and the regulation of spider populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51(1): 441-465. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104. 150947. PMID:16332219.