Developmental experience alters information coding in auditory midbrain and forebrain neurons

Developmental Neurobiology

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 235-252

  Woolley, Sarah M N ^a   Hauber, Mark E ^b,c   Theunissen, Frederic E ^d  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Inferior colliculus; Neural coding; Song; Songbird; Vocalization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FOREBRAIN; MALE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FINCHES; HOUSING, ANIMAL; INFORMATION THEORY; MALE; MESENCEPHALON; MICROELECTRODES; NEURONS; PROSENCEPHALON; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 77649156775     PISSN: 19328451     EISSN: 10974695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20783     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bass AH, Rose GJ, Pritz MB. 2005. Auditory midbrain of fish, amphibians and reptiles: Model systems for understanding auditory function. In: Winer JA, Schreiner CE, editors. The Inferior Colliculus. New York: Springer Press, p 459-492.
2. Bendor D, Wang X. 2005. The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature 436:1161-1165.
3. Bischof HJ, Clayton NS. 1991. Stabilization of sexual preferences by sexual experience in male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata castanotis. Behaviour 118:144-154.
4. Bohn KM, Schmidt-French B, Ma ST, Pollak GD. 2008. Syllable acoustics, temporal patterns, and call composition vary with behavioral context in Mexican free-tailed bats. J Acoust Soc Am 124:1838-1848.
5. Campbell DLM, Hauber ME. 2009a. Spatial and behavioural measures of social discrimination by captive male zebra finches: Implications of sexual and species differences for recognition research. Behav Process 80:90-98.
6. Campbell DLM, Hauber ME. 2009b. Cross-fostering diminishes song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Anim Cogn 12:481-490.
7. Campbell DLM, Hauber ME. 2009c. Conspecific-only experience during development reduces the strength of heterospecific song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): A behavioural test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis. J Ornithol. doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0466-3.
8. Casseday JH, Ehrlich D, Covey E. 1994. Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus. Science 264:847-850.
9. Chang EF, Merzenich MM. 2003. Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development. Science 300:498-502.
10. Chechik G, Anderson MJ, Bar-Yosef O, Young ED, Tishby N, Nelken I. 2006. Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway. Neuron 51:359-368.
11. Clayton NS. 1987. Song tutor choice in zebra finches. Anim Behav 35:714-721.
12. Clayton NS. 1988. Song learning and mate choice in estrildid finches raised by two species. Anim Behav 36:1589-1600.
13. Clayton NS. 1989. The effects of cross-fostering on selective song learning in estrildid finches. Behaviour 109:163-175.
14. Cousillas H, George I, Mathelier M, Richard JP, Henry L, Hausberger M. 2006. Social experience influences the development of a central auditory area. Naturwissenschaften 93:588-596.
15. Covey E, Carr CE. 2005. The auditory midbrain in bats and birds. In: Winer JA, Schreiner CE, editors. The Inferior Colliculus. New York: Springer Press, p 493-536.
16. Covey E, Casseday JH. 1999. Timing in the auditory system of the bat. Annu Rev Physiol 61:457-476.
17. Dayan P, Abbot LF. 2001. Theoretical Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. de Villers-Sidani E, Chang EF, Bao S, Merzenich MM. 2007. Critical period window for spectral tuning defined in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in the rat. J Neurosci 27:180-189.
19. Escabi MA, Miller LM, Read HL, Schreiner CE. 2003. Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 23: 11489-11504.
20. Fortune ES, Margoliash D. 1992. Cytoarchitectonic organization and morphology of cells of the field L complex in male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata). J Comp Neurol 325:388-404.
21. Grace JA, Amin N, Singh NC, Theunissen FE. 2003. Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. J Neurophysiol 89:472-487.
22. Gill P, Munro M, Gastpar M, Theunissen F. 2009. Anthropic correction for mutual information measures and its application to neural redundancy estimation. CoSyNe Abst.
23. Hauber ME, Kilner RM. 2007. Coevolution, communication, and host chick mimicry in parasitic finches: Who mimics whom? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:497-503.
24. Hsu A, Woolley SM, Fremouw TE, Theunissen FE. 2004. Modulation power and phase spectrum of natural sounds enhance neural encoding performed by single auditory neurons. J Neurosci 24:9201-9211.
25. Immelmann K. 1969. Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. In: Hinde RA, editor. Bird Vocalizations. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, p 61-77.
26. Klug A, Bauer EE, Hanson JT, Hurley L, Meitzen J, Pollak GD. 2002. Response selectivity for species-specific calls in the inferior colliculus of Mexican free-tailed bats is generated by inhibition. J Neurophysiol 88:1941-1954.
27. Mittmann DH, Wenstrup JJ. 1995. Combination-sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 90:185-191.
28. Nakahara H, Zhang LI, Merzenich MM. 2004. Specialization of primary auditory cortex processing by sound exposure in the "critical period". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7170-7174.
29. Nataraj K, Wenstrup JJ. 2006. Roles of inhibition in complex auditory responses in the inferior colliculus: Inhibited combination-sensitive neurons. J Neurophysiol 95:2179-2192.
30. Norena AJ, Gourevitch B, Aizawa N, Eggermont JJ. 2006. Spectrally enhanced acoustic environment disrupts frequency representation in cat auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:932-939.
31. Okanoya K, Dooling RJ. 1987. Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: A comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. J Comp Psychol 101:7-15.
32. Pollak G, Marsh D, Bodenhamer R, Souther A. 1977. Echodetecting characteristics of neurons in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized bats. Science 196:675-678.
33. Poon PW, Chen X. 1992. Postnatal exposure to tones alters the tuning characteristics of inferior collicular neurons in the rat. Brain Res 585:391-394.
34. Portfors CV, Sinex DG. 2005. Coding of communication sounds in the inferior colliculus. In: Winer JA, Schreiner CE, editors. The Inferior Colliculus. New York: Springer Press, p 411-425.
35. Price PH. 1979. Developmental determinants if structure in zebra finch song. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:268-277.
36. Rauschecker JP, Tian B, Hauser M. 1995. Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. Science 268:111-114.
37. Rees A, Palmer AR. 1989. Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am 85:1978-1994.
38. Rieke F, Bodnar DA, Bialek W. 1995. Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents. Proc Biol Sci 262:259-265.
39. Rose G, Capranica RR. 1983. Temporal selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. Science 219:1087-1089.
40. Sanchez JT, Gans D, Wenstrup JJ. 2008. Glycinergic "inhibition" mediates selective excitatory responses to combinations of sounds. J Neurosci 28:80-90.
41. Sanes DH, Constantine-Paton M. 1985. The sharpening of frequency tuning curves requires patterned activity during development in the mouse. Mus musculus J Neurosci 5:1152-1166.
42. Strong SP, Koberle R, Ruyter van Steveninck R, Bialek W. 1998. Entropy and information in neural spike trains. Phys Rev Lett 80:197-200.
43. Suga N, O'Neill WE, Manabe T. 1978. Cortical neurons sensitive to combinations of information-bearing elements of biosonar signals in the mustache bat. Science 200:778-781.
44. Suta D, Kvasnak E, Popelar J, Syka J. 2003. Representation of species-specific vocalizations in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. J Neurophysiol 90:3794-3808.
45. Suta D, Popelar J, Syka J. 2008. Coding of communication calls in the subcortical and cortical structures of the auditory system. Physiol Res 57:S149-S159.
46. van Rossum MC. 2001. A novel spike distance. Neural Comput 13:751-763.
47. Wang AY, Woolley SMN. 2007. Effects of species identity and acoustic experience on the songs of zebra and Bengalese finches. In: International Congress of Neuroethology. Vancouver, CA.
48. Wang L, Narayan R, Grana G, Shamir M, Sen K. 2007. Cortical discrimination of complex natural stimuli: Can single neurons match behavior? J Neurosci 27:582-589.
49. Wang X. 2007. Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex. Hear Res 229:81-93.
50. Wang X, Merzenich MM, Beitel R, Schreiner CE. 1995. Representation of a species-specific vocalization in the primary auditory cortex of the common marmoset: Temporal and spectral characteristics. J Neurophysiol 74:2685-2706.
51. Woolley SM, Casseday JH. 2004. Responses properties of single neurons in the zebra finch auditory midbrain: Response patterns, frequency coding, intensity coding and spike latencies. J Neurophys 91: 136-151.
52. Woolley SM, Casseday JH. 2005. Processing of modulated sounds in the zebra finch auditory midbrain: Responses to noise, frequency sweeps, and sinusoidal amplitude modulations. J Neurophysiol 94:1143-1157.
53. Woolley SM, Fremouw TE, Hsu A, Theunissen FE. 2005. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds. Nat Neurosci 8:1371-1379.
54. Woolley SM, Gill PR, Fremouw T, Theunissen FE. 2009. Functional groups in the avian auditory system. J Neurosci 29:2780-2793.
55. Woolley SM, Gill PR, Theunissen FE. 2006. Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain. J Neurosci 26:2499-2512.
56. Woolley SM, Rubel EW. 1997. Bengalese finches Lonchura striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song. J Neurosci 17:6380-6390.
57. Woolley SM, Rubel EW. 2002. Vocal memory and learning in adult Bengalese finches with regenerated hair cells. J Neurosci 22:7774-7787.
58. Yu X, Sanes DH, Aristizabal O, Wadghiri YZ, Turnbull DH. 2007. Large-scale reorganization of the tonotopic map in mouse auditory midbrain revealed by MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12193-12198.
59. Zann RA. 1996. The zebra finch: A synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Zhang LI, Bao S, Merzenich MM. 2001. Persistent and specific influences of early acoustic environments on primary auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci 4:1123-1130.
61. Zhang LI, Bao S, Merzenich MM. 2002. Disruption of primary auditory cortex by synchronous auditory inputs during a critical period. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2309-2314.