Tidal movements and residency of subyearling Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in an Oregon salt marsh channel

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 524-533

  Hering, David K ^a,e   Bottom, Daniel L ^b   Prentice, Earl F ^c   Jones, Kim K ^d   Fleming, Ian A ^a,f  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^e Crater Lake National Park   (United States)

^f MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT USE; JUVENILE; MOVEMENT; SALMONID; SALTMARSH; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TIDAL CYCLE;

OREGON; SALMON ESTUARY; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 77649138915     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F10-003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrahams, M.V., and Healey, M.C. 1993. A comparison of the willingness of four species of Pacific salmon to risk exposure to a predator. Oikos, 66(3): 439-446. doi:10.2307/3544938.
2. Adams, A.J., Wolfe, R.K., Pine, W.E., and Thornton, B.L. 2006. Efficacy of PIT tags and an autonomous antenna system to study the juvenile life stage of an estuarine-dependent fish. Estuaries Coasts, 29(2): 311-317. doi:10.1007/BF02781999.
3. Bottom, D.L., Jones, K.K., Cornwell, T.J., Gray, A., and Simenstad, C.A. 2005a. Patterns of Chinook salmon migration and residency in the Salmon River estuary (Oregon). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 64(1): 79-93. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.008.
4. Bottom, D.L., Simenstad, C.A., Burke, J., Baptista, A.M., Jay, D.A., Jones, K.K., Casillas, E., and Schiewe, M.H. 2005b. Salmon at river's end: the role of the estuary in the decline and recovery of Columbia River salmon. US Dep. Comm., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-68.
5. Boulé, M. E., and K. F. Bierly. 1987. History of wetland development and alteration: what have we wrought? Northwest Environ. J. 3(1): 43-61.
6. Bretsch, K., and Allen, D.M. 2006. Tidal migrations of nekton in salt marsh intertidal creeks. Estuaries Coasts, 29(3): 474-486.
7. Brown, R.S., Geist, D.R., Deters, K.A., and Grassell, A. 2006. Effects of surgically implanted acoustic transmitters >2% of body mass on the swimming performance, survival and growth of juvenile sockeye and Chinook salmon. J. Fish Biol. 69(6): 1626-1638. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01227.x.
8. Congleton, J.L., Davis, S.K., and Foley, S.R. 1981. Distribution, abundance, and outmigration timing of chum and chinook salmon fry in the Skagit salt marsh. In Salmon and Trout Migratory Symposium. Edited by E.L. Brannon and E.O. Salo. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. pp. 153-163.
9. Connolly, P.J., Jezorek, I.G., Martens, K.D., and Prentice, E.F. 2008. Measuring the performance of two stationary interrogation systems for detecting downstream and upstream movement of PIT-tagged salmonids. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 28(2): 402-417. doi:10.1577/M07-008.1.
10. Craig, J.K., and Crowder, L.B. 2000. Factors influencing habitat selection in fishes with a review of marsh ecosystems. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology. Edited by M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 241-266.
11. Giannico, G.R., and Souder, J.A. 2004. The effects of tidegates on estuarine habitats and migratory fish. Oregon Sea Grant, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, Report No. ORESU-G-04-002.
12. Gibson, R.N. 2003. Go with the flow: tidal migrations in marine animals. Hydrobiologia, 503(1-3): 153-161. doi:10.1023/ B:HYDR.0000008488.33614.62.
13. Good, J.W. 2000. Summary and current status of Oregon's estuarine ecosystems. In The Oregon State of the Environment Report 2000. Oregon Progress Board, Salem, Oregon.
14. Gray, A. 2005. The Salmon River estuary: restoring tidal inundation and tracking ecosystem response. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
15. Gray, A., Simenstad, C.A., Bottom, D.L., and Cornwell, T.J. 2002. Contrasting functional performance of juvenile salmon habitat in recovering wetlands of the Salmon River estuary, Oregon, USA. Restor. Ecol. 10(3): 514-526. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002. 01039.x.
16. Healey, M.C. 1980. Utilization of the Nanaimo River estuary by juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Fish. Bull. (Washington, D.C.), 77: 653-668.
17. Healey, M.C. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In Pacific salmon life histories. Edited by C. Groot and L. Margolis. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. pp. 313-393.
18. Jefferson, C.A. 1974. Plant communities and succession in Oregon coastal salt marshes. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
19. Kjelson, M.A., Raquel, P.F., and Fisher, F.W. 1982. Life history of fall-run juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Sacramento -San Joaquin estuary, California. In Estuarine comparisons. Edited by V.S. Kennedy. Academic Press, New York. pp. 393-411.
20. Levy, D.A., and Northcote, T.G. 1982. Juvenile salmon residency in a marsh area of the Fraser River estuary. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39(2): 270-276. doi:10.1139/f82-038.
21. Magnhagen, C. 1988. Predation risk and foraging in juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (O. keta). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45(4): 592-596. doi:10.1139/f88-072.
22. McCormick, M.I., and Smith, S. 2004. Efficacy of passive integrated transponder tags to determine spawning-site visitations by a tropical fish. Coral Reefs, 23: 570-577.
23. Meynecke, J.-O., Poole, G.C., Werry, J., and Lee, S.Y. 2008. Use of PIT tag and underwater video recording in assessing estuarine fish movement in a high intertidal mangrove and salt marsh creek. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 79(1): 168-178. doi:10.1016/j. ecss.2008.03.019.
24. Miller, B.A., and Sadro, S. 2003. Residence time and seasonal movements of juvenile coho salmon in the ecotone and lower estuary of Winchester Creek, South Slough, Oregon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132(3): 546-559. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(2003) 132<0546:RTASMO>2.0.CO;2.
25. Miller, J.A., and Simenstad, C.A. 1997. A comparative assessment of a natural and created estuarine slough as rearing habitat for juvenile chinook and coho salmon. Estuaries, 20(4): 792-806. doi:10.2307/1352252.
26. Moser, M.L., Olson, A.F., and Quinn, T.P. 1991. Riverine and estuarine migratory behavior of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) smolts. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48(9): 1670-1678. doi:10.1139/f91-198.
27. Muir, W.D., Smith, S.G., Williams, J.G., Hockersmith, E.E., and Skalski, J.R. 2001. Survival estimates for migrant yearling Chinook salmon and steelhead tagged with passive integrated transponders in the lower Snake and lower Columbia rivers, 1993-1998. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21(2): 269-282. doi:10.1577/ 1548-8675(2001)021<0269:SEFMYC>2.0.CO;2.
28. Newby, N.C., Binder, T.R., and Stevens, E.D. 2007. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tagging did not negatively affect the short-term feeding behavior or swimming performance of juvenile rainbow trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 136(2): 341-345. doi:10.1577/T06-110.1.
29. Ombredane, D., Bagliniere, J.L., and Marchand, F. 1998. The effects of passive integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and their use for studying movement in a small river. Hydrobiologia, 371-372: 99-106. doi:10.1023/A:1017022026937.
30. Prentice, E.F., Flagg, T.A., McCutcheon, C.S., and Cross, D.C. 1990a. Equipment, methods, and an automated data-entry station for PIT tagging. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 334-340.
31. Prentice, E.F., Flagg, T.A., and McCutcheon, S. 1990b. Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 317-322.
32. Rountree, R.A., and Able, K.W. 1993. Diel variation in decapod crustacean and fish assemblages in New Jersey polyhaline marsh creeks. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 37(2): 181-201. doi:10.1006/ ecss.1993.1050.
33. Rountree, R.A., and Able, K.W. 2007. Spatial and temporal habitat use patterns for saltmarsh nekton: implications for ecological functions. Aquat. Ecol. 41(1): 25-45. doi:10.1007/s10452-006-9052-4.
34. Rozas, L.P. 1995. Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: a pulsing ecosystem. Estuaries, 18(4): 579-590. doi:10.2307/1352378.
35. Schreck, C.B., Stahl, T.P., Davis, L.E., Roby, D.D., and Clemens, B.J. 2006. Mortality estimates of juvenile spring-summer Chinook salmon in the Lower Columbia River and estuary 1992-1998: evidence for delayed mortality? Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135(2): 457-475. doi:10.1577/T05-184.1.
36. Semmens, B.X. 2008. Acoustically derived fine-scale behaviors of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) associated with intertidal benthic habitats in an estuary. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65(9): 2053-2062. doi:10.1139/F08-107.
37. Shreffler, D.K., Simenstad, C.A., and Thom, R.M. 1990. Temporary residence by juvenile salmon in a restored estuarine wetland. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47(11): 2079-2084. doi:10.1139/f90-232.
38. Shreffler, D.K., Simenstad, C.A., and Thom, R.M. 1992. Foraging by juvenile salmon in a restored estuarine wetland. Estuaries, 15(2): 204-213. doi:10.2307/1352693.
39. Simenstad, C.A. 1983. The ecology of estuarine channels of the Pacific Northwest coast: a community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS/OBS-83/05.
40. Simenstad, C.A., and Cordell, J.R. 2000. Ecological assessment criteria for restoring anadromous salmonid habitat in Pacific Northwest estuaries. Ecol. Eng. 15(3-4): 283-302. doi:10.1016/ S0925-8574(00)00082-3.
41. Simenstad, C.A., Fresh, K.L., and Salo, E.O. 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function. In Estuarine comparisons. Edited by V.S. Kennedy. Academic Press, New York. pp. 343-364.
42. Webster, S.J., Dill, L.M., and Korstrom, J.S. 2007. The effects of depth and salinity on juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum) habitat choice in an artificial estuary. J. Fish Biol. 71(3): 842-851. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01553. x.
43. Williams, J.G. 2008. Mitigating the effects of high-head dams on the Columbia River, USA: experience from the trenches. Hydrobiologia, 609(1): 241-251. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9411-3.
44. Zydlewski, G.B., Horton, G., Dubreuil, T., Letcher, B., Casey, S., and Zydlewski, J. 2006. Remote monitoring of fish in small streams: a unified approach using PIT tags. Fisheries, 31(10): 492-502. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2006)31[492:RMOFIS]2.0.CO;2.