Non-rigid registration of breast surfaces using the laplace and diffusion equations

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Ong, Rowena E ^a   Ou, Jao J ^a   Miga, Michael I ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; DIFFUSION EQUATIONS; FIDUCIALS; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; GOLD STANDARDS; INTENSITY IMAGES; ISO-CONTOURS; MEAN ERRORS; NON-RIGID; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; NOVEL SURFACES; SEMI-AUTOMATED; SURFACE CORRESPONDENCE; SURFACE REGISTRATION; THIN-PLATE SPLINE; TISSUE MIMICKING PHANTOM;

LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 77649092051     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-9-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society 2009, , http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf
2. Brooksby BA, Dehghani H, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD. Near-infrared (NIR) tomography breast image reconstruction with a priori structural information from MRI: algorithm development for reconstructing heterogeneities. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2003, 9:199-209.
3. Cherepenin V, Karpov A, Korjenevsky A, Kornienko V, Mazaletskaya A, Mazourov D, Meister D. A 3D electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system for breast cancer detection. Physiological Measurement 2001, 22:9-18. 10.1088/0967-3334/22/1/302, 11236894.
4. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography - a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging 1991, 13:111-134. 10.1016/0161-7346(91)90079-W, 1858217.
5. McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, Manduca A, Hartmann LC, Ehman RL. MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 178(6):1411-1417.
6. Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J, Fink M. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 23(2):159-165. 10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.060, 15833607.
7. Miga MI. A new approach to elastography using mutual information and finite elements. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2003, 48:467-80. 10.1088/0031-9155/48/4/304, 12630742.
8. Washington CW, Miga M. Modality independent elastography (MIE): a new approach to elasticity imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2004, 23:1117-28. 10.1109/TMI.2004.830532, 15377121.
9. Ou JJ, Ong RE, Yankeelov TE, Miga MI. Evaluation of 3D modality-independent elastography for breast imaging: a simulation study. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2008, 53(1):147-163. 10.1088/0031-9155/53/1/010, 18182693.
10. Papademetris X, Sinusas AJ, et al. Estimation of 3-D left ventricular deformation from medical images using biomechanical models. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2002, 21(7):786-800. 10.1109/TMI.2002.801163, 12374316.
11. Chui HL, Rangarajan A. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2003, 89(2-3):114-141.
12. Dinh HQ. Implicit Shapes: Reconstruction and Explicit Transformation. PhD Dissertation, 2002, Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing.
13. Roose L, Mollemans W, et al. Biomechanically based elastic breast registration using mass tensor simulation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Miccai Pt 2 2006, 4191:718-725.
14. Fei BW, Duerk JL, Sodee DB, Wilson DL. Semiautomatic nonrigid registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. Academic Radiology 2005, 12(7):815-824. 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.063, 16039535.
15. Rueckert D, Hayes C, et al. Non-rigid registration of breast MR images using mutual information. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Miccai 1998, 1496:1144-1152.
16. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, et al. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18(8):712-721. 10.1109/42.796284, 10534053.
17. Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, et al. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22(6):730-741. 10.1109/TMI.2003.814791, 12872948.
18. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, et al. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Medical Physics 2007, 34(4):1221-1233. 10.1118/1.2712040, 17500454.
19. Froh MS, Barber DC, et al. Piecewise-quadrilateral registration by optical flow - Applications in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Miccai Pt 2 2006, 4191:686-693.
20. Crum WR, Tanner C, et al. Anisotropic multi-scale fluid registration: evaluation in magnetic resonance breast imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2005, 50(21):5153-5174. 10.1088/0031-9155/50/21/014, 16237247.
21. Goshtasby A. Registration of Images with Geometric Distortions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1988, 26(1):60-64.
22. Lapidus L, Pinder GF. Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering. 1982, Wiley-Interscience.