Repeated cross-sectional randomized response data: Taking design change and self-protective responses into account

Methodology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 145-152

  Frank, L E ^a   Van Den Hout, A ^b   Van Der Heijden, P G M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MRC BIOSTATISTICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Linear trend; Longitudinal data; Misclassification; Randomized response; Repeated cross sections; Self protective responses

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649087937     PISSN: 16141881     EISSN: 16142241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241.5.4.145     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Böckenholt, U., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2007). Item randomized-response models for measuring noncompliance: Risk-return perceptions, social influences, and self-protective responses. Psychometrika, 72, 245-262.
3. Boruch, R. F. (1971). Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: a note on strategies. The American Sociologist, 6, 308-311.
4. Chaudhuri, A., & Mukerjee, R. (1988). Randomized response: Theory and techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
5. Chen, T. T. (1989). A review of methods for misclassified categorical data in epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 1095-1106.
6. Clark, S. J., & Desharnais, R. A. (1998). Honest answers to embarrassing questions: Detecting cheating in the randomized response model. Psychological Methods, 3, 160-168.
7. Copeland, K. T., Checkoway, H., McMichael, A. J., & Holbrook, R. H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 105, 488-195.
8. Cruyff, M. J. L. F., van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Böckenholt, U. (2007). Log-linear randomized-response models taking self-protective response behavior into account. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 266-282.
9. Edgell, S. E., Himmelfarb, S., & Duncan, K. L. (1982). Validity of forced response in a randomized response model. Soci ologial Methods and Research, 11, 89-110.
10. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1998). An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.
11. Fox, J. A., & Tracy, P. E. (1986). Randomized response. A method for sensitive surveys (No. 58). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
12. Greenland, S. (1980). The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. American Journal of Epidemiology, 112, 564-569.
13. Greenland, S. (1988). Variance estimation for epidemiologic effect estimates under misclassification. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 745-757.
14. Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data: New developments (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
15. Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data. Loglinear analysis ofpanel, trend and cohort data. Newbury Park: Sage.
16. Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Newbury Park: Sage.
17. Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L. C. R. J., & Gouweleeuw, J. M. (1997). PRAM: A method for disclosure limitation of microdata. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands (Research paper No. 9705).
18. Kuha, J., & Skinner, C. (1997). Categorical data analysis and misclassification. In L. Lyberg (Ed.), Survey measurement and process quality. New York: Wiley.
19. Kuk, A. Y. C. (1990). Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika, 77, 436-138.
20. Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 319-348.
21. Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Laudy, O. (2006). A validation of a computer-assisted randomized response survey to estimate the prevalence of fraud in social security. Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society A, 169, 305-318.
22. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Magder, L. S., & Hughes, J. P. (1997). Logistic regression when the outcome is measured with uncertainty. American Journal of Epidemiology, 146, 195-203.
24. Moriarty, M., & Wiseman, F. (1976). On the choice of a randomization technique with the randomized response model. In Proceedings ofthe social statistics section of the American statistical association (pp. 624-626). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
25. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2007). Multilevel and latent variable modeling with composite links and exploded likelihoods. Psychometrika, 72(2), 123-140.
26. Scheers, N. J., & Dayton, C. M. (1988). Covariate randomized response models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 969-974.
27. Soeken, K. L., & Macready, G. B. (1982). Respondents' perceived protection when using randomized response. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 487-489.
28. Van den Hout, A., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2002). Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: A review. International Statistical Review, 70, 269-288.
29. Van den Hout, A., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2004). The analysis of multivariate misclassified data with special attention to randomized response. Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 384-410.
30. Van der Heijden, P. G. M., van Gils, G., Bouts, J., & Hox, J. J. (2000). A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning. Eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 505-537.
31. Vermunt, J. K. (2005). Mixed-effects logistic regression models for indirectly observed outcome variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 281-301.
32. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2003). Latent class models for classification. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41, 531-537.
33. Walter, S. D., Irwig, L., & Glasziou, P. P. (1999). Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 10, 943-951.
34. Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63-69.