How is the Children's Implant Profile used in the Cochlear Implant Candidacy Process?

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 412-415

  Lazaridis, Evelyn ^a   Therres, MaryKay ^a   Marsh, Roger R ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Candidacy; Children; ChIP; Cochlear Implant; Selection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MODIFIED CHILDREN IMPLANT PROFILE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADOLESCENT; CHECKLIST; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77549088897     PISSN: 01655876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nikolopoulos T.P., Archbold S.M., and O'Donoghue G.M. The development of auditory perception in children following cochlear implantation. Inter. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 49 (1999) 189-199
2. Nikolopoulos T.P., and O'Donoghue G.M. Cochlear implantation in adults and children. Hospital Med. 59 1 (1998) 46-50
3. Archbold S.M., O'Donoghue G.M., and Nikolopoulos T.P. Cochlear implants: an analysis of use over a three-year period. Am. J. Otol. 19 (1998) 328-331
4. Nikolopoulos T.P., Wells P., and Archbold S.M. Using listening progress profile (LIP) to assess early functional auditory performance in Young implanted children. Deaf Educ. Int. 2 3 (2000) 142-151
5. Makhdoum M.J.A., Snik A.F.M., and Van Den Broek P. Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results. J. Laryngol. Otol. 111 (1997) 1008-1017
6. Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children. NIH Consens Statement. 1995;13(2):1-30. http://consensus.nih.gov/1995/1995CochlearImplants100html.htm. Accessed May 28, 2009.
7. Hellman S.A., Chute P.M., Kretschmer R.E., Nevins M.E., Parisier S.C., and Thurston L.C. The development of a Children's Implant Profile. Am. Ann Deaf. 136 2 (1991) 77-81
8. Nikolopoulos T.P., Dyar D., and Gibbin K.P. Assessing candidate children for cochlear implantation with the Nottingham Children's Implant Profile (NChIP): the first 200 children. Inter. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 68 (2004) 127-135
9. Edwards L.C. Candidacy and Children's Implant Profile: is our selection appropriate?. Int. J. Audiol. 42 (2003) 426-431
10. Daya H., Figueirido J.C., Gordon K.A., Twitchell K., Gysin C., and Papsin B.C. The role of a graded profile analysis in determining candidacy and outcome for cochlear implantation in children. Inter. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 49 2 (1999) 135-142
11. MacDonald L., Sohn G., Papsin B.C., and Gordon K.A. Use of a Graded Profile Analysis to assess cochlear implant candidacy: recent findings. Int. Congr. Ser. 1273 (2004) 215-218
12. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/coch.asp. Updated May 2009. Accessed May 28, 2009.
13. Miyamoto R.T., Osberger M.J., Todd S.L., Robbins A.M., Stroer B.S., Zimmerman-Phillips S., et al. Variables affecting implant performance in children. Laryngoscope 104 (1994) 1120-1124
14. Nikolopoulos T.P., O'Donoghue G.M., and Archbold S.M. Age at implantation: its importance in paediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 109 (1999) 595-599