Mechanical contributions to astrocyte adhesion using a novel in vitro model of catheter obstruction

Experimental Neurology

Volumn 222, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 204-210

  Harris, Carolyn A ^a,b   Resau, James H ^c   Hudson, Eric A ^c   West, Richard A ^c   Moon, Candice ^a   McAllister II, James P ^a,b,d  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b PRIMARY CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheter; Cell adhesion; Cerebrospinal fluid; Hydrocephalus; In vitro modeling; Obstruction

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; BIOREACTOR; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CELL ADHESION; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID FLOW; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS; FLOW RATE; HYDROCEPHALUS; HYDROCEPHALUS SHUNT CATHETER BIOREACTOR; IN VITRO STUDY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; NERVE CELL CULTURE; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; BIOMECHANICS; BIOREACTORS; BRAIN; CATHETERIZATION; CELL ADHESION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; GLIAL FIBRILLARY ACIDIC PROTEIN; INDOLES; PULSATILE FLOW; RATS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 77549087649     PISSN: 00144886     EISSN: 10902430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Browd S., Ragel B., Gottfried O., and Kestle J. Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: obstruction and mechanical failure. Pediatr. Neurol. 34 (2006) 83-92
2. Del Bigio M., and Fedoroff S. Short-term response of brain tissue to cerebrospinal fluid shunts in vivo and in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 26 (1992) 979-987
3. Detwiler P., Porter R., and Rekate H. Hydrocephalus-clinical features and management. In: Choux M., Di Rocco C., Hockley A., and Walker M. (Eds). Pediatric neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone (1999) 253-271
4. Enchev Y., and Oi S. Historical trends of neuroendoscopic surgical techniques in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg. Rev. 31 (2008) 249-262
5. Fournier E., Passirani C., Montero-Menei C., and Benoit J. Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 3311-3331
6. Goldblum R., Pelley R., O'Donell A., Pyron D., and Heggers J. Antibodies to silicone elastomers and reactions to ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Lancet 340 (1992) 510-513
7. Gower D., Lewis J., and Kelly D.J. Sterile shunt malfunction. A scanning electron microscopic perspective. J. Neurosurg. 61 (1984) 1079-1084
8. Gower D., Watson D., and Harper D. e-PTFE ventricular shunt catheters. Neurosurgery 31 (1992) 1132-1135
9. Johanson C., Duncan J.r., Klinge P., Brinker T., Stopa E., and Silverberg G. Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: new challenges in health and disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. (2008) 5
10. Johanson C., Stopa E., and McMillan P. The blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier: structural and functional significance. In: Nag S. (Ed). The blood-brain and other neural barriers-biology and research protocols (2010), Humana Press
11. Juurlink B., and Hertz L. Plasticity of astrocytes in primary cultures: an experimental tool and a reason for methodological caution. Dev. Neurosci. 7 (1985) 263-277
12. Menei P., Croue A., Daniel V., Pouplard-Barthelaix A., and Benoit J. Fate and biocompatibility of three types of microspheres implanted into the brain. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 (1994) 1079-1085
13. Ostrow L., and Sachs F. Mechanosensation and endothelin in astrocytes-hypothetical roles in CNS pathophysiology. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 48 (2005) 488-508
14. Razumovsky A., and Hanley D. Intracranial pressure measurement/cranial vault mechanics: clinical and experimental observations. Curr. Opin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 5 (1992) 818-825
15. Roca-Cusachs P., Gauthier N., Del Rio A., and Sheetz M. Clustering of alpha(5)beta(1) integrins determines adhesion strength whereas alpha(v)beta(3) and talin enable mechanotransduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 16245-16250
16. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 362 (1993) 801-809
17. Rudge J., Smith G., and Silver J. An in vitro model of wound healing in the CNS: analysis of cell reaction and interaction at different ages. Exp. Neurol. 103 (1989) 1-16
18. Schoener W., Reparon C., Verheggen R., and Markakis E. Evaluation of shunt failures by compliance analysis and inspection of shunt valves and shunt materials, using microscopic or scanning electron microscopic techniques. In: Matsumoto S., and Tamaki N. (Eds). Hydrocephalus (1991), Pathogenesis and Treatment. Springer-Verlag, Hong Kong 452-472
19. Sekhar L., Moossy J., and Guthkelch A. Malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Clinical and pathological features. J. Neurosurg. 56 (1982) 411-416
20. Serlo W., Fernell E., Heikkinen E., Anderson H., and von Wendt L. Functions and complications of shunts in different etiologies of childhood hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv. Syst. 6 (1990) 92-94
21. Silverberg G., Huhn S., Jaffe R., Chang S., Saul T., Heit G., Von Essen A., and Rubenstein E. Downregulation of cerebrospinal fluid production in patients with chronic hydrocephalus. J. Neurosurg. 97 (2002) 1271-1275
22. Tsuchiya T. Studies on the standardization of cytotoxicity tests and new standard reference materials useful for evaluating the safety of biomaterials. J. Biomater. Appl. 9 (1994) 138-157
23. Wagshul M., Chen J., Egnor M., McCormack E., and Roche P. Amplitude and phase of cerebrospinal fluid pulsations: experimental studies and review of the literature. J. Neurosurg. 104 (2006) 810-819
24. Zhu C., Yago T., Lou J., Zarnitsyna V., and McEver R. Mechanisms for flow-enhanced cell adhesion. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36 (2008) 604-621