On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 154-164

  Brozović, Nicholas ^a   Sunding, David L ^b   Zilberman, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Common property resource; Dynamic optimization; Groundwater

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER MODEL; COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; ECONOMIC MODELS; ECONOMIC STUDY; GROUNDWATER FLOW EQUATION; GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER PUMPING; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; PUMPING WELL; SINGLE-CELL MODELS; SPATIAL DYNAMICS; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELS; SURFACE AREA;

AQUIFERS; ECONOMICS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; PUMPS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

AQUIFER; COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCE; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77549084890     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen R.C., and Gisser M. Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping when demand is nonlinear. Water Resources Research 20 (1984) 752-756
2. Boulton N.S. Unsteady radial flow to a pumped well allowing for delayed yield from storage. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication 37 (1954) 472-477
3. Burness H.S., and Brill T.C. The role for policy in common pool groundwater use. Resource and Energy Economics 23 (2001) 19-40
4. Domenico P.A. Concepts and Models in Groundwater Hydrology (1972), McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Donohoe, L.C., 2004. Selected hydrologic data for the Upper Rio Hondo Basin, Lincoln County, New Mexico, 1945-2003. Technical Report 2004-5275, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
6. Feinerman E., and Knapp K.C. Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity, and distribution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983) 703-710
7. Freeze R.A., and Cherry J.A. Groundwater (1979), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
8. Gisser M., and Mercado A. Integration of the agricultural demand function for water and the hydrological model of the Pecos Basin. Water Resources Research 8 (1972) 1373-1384
9. Gisser M., and Sanchez D.A. Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping. Water Resources Research 16 (1980) 638-642
10. Hsiao C.-T., and Chang L.-C. Dynamic optimal groundwater management with inclusion of fixed costs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 128 (2002) 57-65
11. Hutson, S.S., Barber, N.L., Kenny, J.F., Linsey, K.S., Lumia, D.S., Maupin, M.A., 2004. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2000. Technical Report. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
12. Karp L.S. Social welfare in a common property oligopoly. International Economic Review 33 (1992) 353-372
13. Kim C.S., Moore M.R., Hanchar J.J., and Nieswiadomy M. A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17 (1989) 66-82
14. Koundouri P. Potential for groundwater management: Gisser-Sanchez effect reconsidered. Water Resources Research 40 (2004) doi:10.1029/2003WR002164
15. Neuman S.P. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resources Research 8 (1972) 1031-1044
16. Nieswiadomy M. The demand for irrigation water in the High Plains of Texas, 1957-1980. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985) 619-626
17. Reilly, T.E., Dennehy, K.F., Alley, W.M., Cunningham, W.L., 2008. Ground-water availability in the United States, Technical Report. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1323, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
18. Robson, S.G., Banta, E.R., 1995. Ground water atlas of the United States: Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah (HA 730-C). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
19. Rubio S.J., and Casino B. Competitive versus efficient extraction of a common property resource: the groundwater case. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (2001) 1117-1137
20. Ryder, P.D., Ground water atlas of the United States: Oklahoma, Texas (HA 730-E). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
21. Theis C.V. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions American Geophysical Union 2 (1935) 519-524
22. Willis R., and Yeh W.W.-G. Groundwater Systems Planning and Management (1987), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Worthington V.E., Burt O.R., and Brustkern R.L. Optimal management of a confined groundwater system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12 (1985) 229-245