Effects of temperature and growth hormone on individual growth trajectories of wild-type and transgenic coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 641-654

  Lohmus M ^a   Bjorklund M ^b   Sundstrom L F ^a   Devlin, R H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fishes; Growth variation; Hormones; Salmonids

Indexed keywords

GROWTH HORMONE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH; TEMPERATURE; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GENOTYPE; GROWTH HORMONE; ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH; TEMPERATURE;

ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH; PISCES; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 77449135582     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02521.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrahams M V, Sutterlin A. The foraging and antipredator behaviour of growth-enhanced transgenic Atlantic salmon. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:933-942.
2. Ali M, Nicieza A G, Wootton R J. Compensatory growth in fishes: a response to growth depression. Fish and Fisheries 2003, 4:147-190.
3. Bessey C, Devlin R H, Liley N R, Biagi C A. Reproductive performance of growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2004, 133:1205-1220.
4. Björklund M. Phenotypic variation of growth trajectories in finches. Evolution 1993, 47:1506-1514.
5. Björklund M. Variation in growth in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1997, 10:139-155.
6. Björklund M, Hirvonen H, Seppa T, Peuhkuri N, Piironen J. Phenotypic variation in growth trajectories in the Arctic charr Salvelinus Alpinus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2003, 16:543-550.
7. Björnsson B T. The biology of salmon growth hormone: from daylight to dominance. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 1997, 17:9-24.
8. Björnsson B T, Johansson V, Benedet S, Einarsdóttir I E, Hildahl J, Agustsson T, Jönsson E. Growth hormone endocrinology of salmonids: regulatory mechanisms and mode of action. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 2002, 27:227-242.
9. Brannon E L, Powell M S, Quinn T P, Talbot A. Population structure of Columbia River basin Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Reviews in Fisheries Science 2004, 12:99-232.
10. Brett J R. Environmental factors and growth. Fish Physiology 1979, 599-675. Hoar W SRandall D JBrett J R. In, Vol. VIII (, eds), pp., London, Academic Press, Inc.
11. Cheverud J M, Wagner G P, Dow M M. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Systematic Zoology 1989, 38:201-203.
12. Cutts C, Adams C, Campbell A. Stability of physiological and behavioural determinants of performance in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2001, 58:961-968.
13. Cutts C J, Metcalfe N B, Taylor A C. Aggression and growth depression in juvenile Atlantic salmon: the consequences of individual variation in standard metabolic rate. Journal of Fish Biology 1998, 52:1026-1037.
14. Cutts C J, Metcalfe N B, Taylor A C. Fish may fight rather than feed in a novel environment: metabolic rate and feeding motivation in juvenile Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 2002, 61:1540-1548.
15. Devlin R H, Yesaki T Y, Biagi C A, Donaldson E M, Swanson P, Chan W K. Extraordinary salmon growth. Nature 1994, 371:209-210.
16. Devlin R H, Johnsson J I, Smailus D E, Biagi C A, Jonsson E, Björnsson B T. Increased ability to compete for food by growth hormone-transgenic coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum). Aquaculture Research 1999, 30:479-482.
17. Devlin R H, Swanson P, Clarke W C, Plisetskaya E, Dickhoff W, Moriyama S, Yesaki T Y, Hew C L. Seawater adaptability and hormone levels in growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Aquaculture 2000, 191:367-385.
18. Devlin R H, Biagi C A, Yesaki T Y. Growth, viability and genetic characteristics of GH transgenic coho salmon strains. Aquaculture 2004a, 236:607-632.
19. Devlin R H, D'Andrade M, Uh M, Biagi C A. Population effects of growth hormone transgenic coho salmon depend on food availability and genotype by environment interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004b, 101:9303-9308.
20. Devlin R H, Sundström L F, Muir W M. Interface of biotechnology and ecology for environmental risk assessments of transgenic fish. Trends in Biotechnology 2006, 24:89-97.
21. Dieckmann U, Heino M. Fishing drives rapid evolution. Swedish Research for Sustainability 2004, 3-4:18-19.
22. Donaldson E M, Devlin R H. Uses of biotechnology to enhance production. Principles of Salmonid Culture. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science 1996, 969-1020. Pennell W, Barton B. In, eds), pp., Amsterdam, Elsevier Publishers
23. Efron B, Tibshirani R J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1993, London, Chapman & Hall
24. Hallerman E M, Kapuscinski A R. Incorporating risk assessment and risk management into public policies on genetically modified finfish and shellfish. Aquaculture 1995, 137:9-17.
25. Jhingan E, Devlin R H, Iwama G K. Disease resistance, stress response and effects of triploidy in growth hormone transgenic coho salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 2003, 63:806-823.
26. Johansson V, Winberg S, Bjornsson B T. Growth hormone-induced stimulation of swimming and feeding behaviour of rainbow trout is abolished by the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH23390. General and Comparative Endocrinology 2005, 141:58-65.
27. Jones A G, Arnold S J, Bürger R. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 2003, 57:1747-1760.
28. Jönsson E, Johansson V, Björnsson B T, Winberg S. Central nervous system actions of growth hormone on brain monoamine levels and behavior of juvenile rainbow trout. Hormones and Behavior 2003, 43:367-374.
29. Kirkpatrick M, Lofsvold D. Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 1992, 46:954-971.
30. Kirkpatrick M, Lofsvold D, Bulmer M. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 1990, 124:979-993.
31. Leggatt R A, Devlin R H, Farrell A P, Randall D J. Oxygen uptake of growth hormone transgenic coho salmon during starvation and feeding. Journal of Fish Biology 2003, 62:1053-1066.
32. Lõhmus M, Raven P A, Sundström L F, Devlin R H. Disruption of seasonality in growth hormone-transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and the role of cholecystokinin in seasonal feeding behavior. Hormones and Behavior 2008, 54:506-513.
33. Metcalfe N B. Differential response to a competitor by Atlantic salmon adopting alternative life-history strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1989, 236:21-27.
34. Metcalfe N B, Monaghan P. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2001, 16:254-260.
35. Mori T, Devlin R H. Transgene and host growth hormone gene expression in pituitary and nonpituitary tissues of normal and growth hormone transgenic salmon. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 1999, 149:129-139.
36. Morrison D F. Multivariate Statistical Methods 1990, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill
37. Muir W M, Howard R D. Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Research 2002, 11:101-114.
38. Oakes J D, Higgs D A, Eales J G, Devlin R H. Influence of ration level on the growth performance and body composition of non-transgenic and growth-hormone-transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 2007, 265:309-324.
39. Olla B L, Davis M, Ryer C H. Foraging and predator avoidance in hatchery-reared Pacific salmon: achievement of behavioural potential. The Importance of Feeding Behaviour for the Efficient Culture of Salmonid Fishes 1992, 5-13. Thorpe J E, Huntingford F A, In, eds), pp., Baton Rouge, FL, The World Aquaculture Society
40. Raven P A, Devlin R H, Higgs D A. Influence of dietary digestible energy content on growth, protein and energy utilization and body composition of growth-hormone transgenic and non-transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 2006, 254:730-747.
41. Raven P A, Uh M, Sakhrani D, Beckman B R, Cooper K, Pinter J, Leder E H, Silverstein J, Devlin R H. Endocrine effects of growth hormone overexpression in transgenic coho salmon. General and Comparative Endocrinology 2008, 159:26-37.
42. Richter A, Kolmes S A. Maximum temperature limits for Chinook, coho, and chum salmon, and steelhead trout in the Pacific Northwest. Reviews in Fisheries Science 2005, 13:23-49.
43. Snow A A, Andow D A, Gepts P, Hallerman E M, Power A, Tiedje J M, Wolfenbargerh L L. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: current status and recommendations. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:377-404.
44. Sullivan K, Martin D J, Carwell R E, Toll J E, Duke S. An Analysis of the Effects of the Temperature on Salmonids of the Pacific Northwest with Implications for Selecting Temperature Criteria 2000, Portland, OR, Sustainable Ecosystems Institute
45. Sundström L F, Devlin R H, Johnsson J I, Biagi C A. Vertical position reflects increased feeding motivation in growth hormone transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Ethology 2003, 109:701-712.
46. Sundström L F, Lõhmus M, Devlin R H, Johnsson J I, Biagi C A, Bohlin T. Feeding on profitable and unprofitable prey: comparing behaviour of growth-enhanced transgenic and normal coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Ethology 2004, 110:381-396.
47. Sundström L F, Lõhmus M, Devlin R H. Selection on increased intrinsic growth rates in coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Evolution 2005, 59:1560-1569.
48. Sundström L F, Lõhmus M, Tymchuk W E, Devlin R H. Gene-environment interactions influence ecological consequences of transgenic animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:3889-3894.
49. Sundström L F, Tymchuk W E, Lõhmus M, Devlin R H. Sustained predation effects of hatchery-reared transgenic coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch in semi-natural environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46:726-769.
50. Whitlock M C. Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2005, 18:1368-1373.