Guidelines; From foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Carlsen, Benedicte ^a   Kjellberg, Pia K ^b  

^a Uni Research   (Norway)

^b Dansk Sundhedsinstitut   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DENMARK; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DENMARK; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 77449109588     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-17     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. CM Farquhar EW Kofa JR Slutsky, The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 177 502 506 12405894
2. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Grimshaw M Eccles J Tetroe, The journal of continuing education in the health professions 2004 24 Suppl 1 31 37 10.1002/chp.1340240506 15069910
3. Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: exploring differences in adherence to guidelines between three European countries. Drug Education Project Group. C Veninga C Lundborg P Lagerlov E Hummers-Pradier P Denig F Haaijer-Ruskampl, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2000 34 19 26 10.1345/aph.19068 10669181
4. Are GPs using clinical practice guidelines? D Mazza SJ Russell, Australian Family Physician 2001 30 817 821 11681161
5. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. AD Oxman MA Thomson DA Davis RB Haynes, CMAJ 1995 153 1423 1431 7585368
6. Thou shalt versus thou shalt not. A qualitative meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. B Carlsen C Glenton C Pope, British Journal of General Practice 2007 57 971 978 10.3399/096016407782604820 18252073
7. Use of guidelines in primary care - practitioners' perspectives. C Langley A Faulkner C Watkins S Gray I Harvey, Fam Pract 1998 15 105 111 10.1093/fampra/15.2.105 9613476
8. "What lies beneath it all?" - an interview study of GPs' attitudes to the use of guidelines. B Carlsen OF Norheim, BMC Health Services Research 2008 8 218 (22 October 2008) 10.1186/1472-6963-8-218 18945360
9. Riksrevisjonen [The Office of the Auditor General], Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse om forvaltning av og måloppnåelse av fastlegeordningen [The Office of the Auditor General's report regarding the management and achievements of the goals of the Regular General Practitioner Scheme.] Report No. 1 2005 Oslo, Riksrevisjonen 2005
10. Norwegian Medicines Agency, Norske retningslinjer for legemiddeløkonomisk analyse til bruk ved refusjonssøknader [Norwegian guidelines for phamaco-economic analysis in applications for reimbursements] Oslo Statens legemiddelverk [Norwegian Medicines Agency] 2002
11. The Danish College of General Practitioners, Kliniske vejledninger i almen medicin [Clinical guidance in general practice] Copenhagen DSAM 1996
12. Institute for rational pharmacotherapy: Copenhagen: IRF, http://www.irf.dk/en/home.htm (Accessed 10.11.2009)
13. J Green N Thorogood, Qualitative Methods for Health Research London Sage 2004
14. M Miles A Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook London Sage 1994
15. Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting. F Tudiver J Brown W Medved C Herbert P Ritvo R Guibert, et al. J Fam Pract 2001 50 682 687 11509162
16. Clinical guidelines on depression: A qualitative study of GPs' views. L Smith A Walker K Gilhooly, J Fam Pract 2004 53 556 561 15251095
17. Assessing the awareness of and attitude to NICE guidance within GP partnerships in one PCO in Wales: a qualitative study using focus group interviews. S Venn A Edwards, Quality in Primary Care 2003 11 123 128
18. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. AC Freeman K Sweeney, BMJ 2001 323 7321 1100 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1100 11701576
19. Practice guidelines for clinical prevention: Do patients physicians and experts share common ground? M Beaulieu E Hudon D Roberge R Pineault D Forte J Legare, Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999 161 519 523 10497607
20. Retningslinjer for allmennpraksis - blir de lest og blir de brukt? (Guidelines in general practice: are they read and are they used?). S Treweek S Flottorp A Fretheim K Håvelsrud DT Kristoffersen A Oxman, et al. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005 125 300 303 15702152
21. Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. K Checkland S Harrison R McDonald S Grant S Campbell B Guthrie, Sociology of Health & Illness 2008 30 788 803
22. Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. H Charles-Jones J Latimer C May, Sociol Health & Illness 2003 25 71 92
23. Overcoming Resistance to Change. L Coch JRP French Jr, Human Relations 1948 1 512 32 10.1177/001872674800100408
24. Practice guidelines: the physician's friend or foe? H Grissom, Current Surgery 2000 57 158 160 10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00190-2 16093052
25. Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research? PL Twohig W Putnam, Fam Pract 2002 19 278 284 10.1093/fampra/19.3.278 11978719
26. The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data. HR Bernard P Killworth D Kronenfeld L Sailer, Annual Review of Anthropology 1984 13 495 517 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431
27. Attitudes and Behavior. H Schuman MP Johnson, Annual Review of Sociology 1976 2 161 207 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.001113