Vision-related quality of life and visual function after vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal disorders

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 744-751

  Okamoto, Fumiki ^a   Okamoto, Yoshifumi ^a   Fukuda, Shinichi ^a   Hiraoka, Takahiro ^a   Oshika, Tetsuro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

25 ITEM NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; CENTRAL RETINA VEIN OCCLUSION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETINA DEGENERATION; RETINA MACULA HOLE; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VITRECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA DISEASE; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VISION; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETINAL DISEASES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 77449099650     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3992     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spitzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1050-1058.
2. Cusick M, SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY, et al. Central visual function and the NEI VFQ-25 near and distance activities subscale scores in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139: 1042-1050.
3. Berdeaux GH, Nordmann JP, Colin E, Arnould B. Vision-related quality of life in patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:271-279.
4. Cahill MT, Banks AD, Stinnett SS, Toth CA. Vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:152-158.
5. Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Gordon MO. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus Study Group: quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:527-535.
6. Hyman LG, Komaroff E, Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Leske MC. Early Manifest Trial Group: treatment and vision-related quality of life in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 1505-1513.
7. Schiffman RM, Walt JG, Jacobsen G, Doyle JJ, Lebovics G, Sumner W. Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1412-1419.
8. Bradley EA, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Garrity JA, Woog JJ, West SK. Evaluation of the National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire in Graves' ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmology. 2006;113: 1450-1454.
9. Deramo VA, Cox TA, Syed AB, Lee PP, Fekrat S. Vision-related quality of life in people with central retinal vein occlusion using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1297-1302.
10. Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Fukuda S, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Visionrelated quality of life and visual function following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145: 1031-1036.
11. Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:85-90.
12. Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Gass CA, et al. Visual quality of life after macular hole surgery: outcome and predictive factors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:481-484.
13. Tranos PG, Ghazi-Nouri SM, Rubin GS, Adams ZC, Charteris DG. Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:995-1002.
14. Tranos PG, Peter NM, Nath R, et al. Macular hole surgery without prone positioning. Eye. 2007;21:802-806.
15. Ghazi-Nouri SM, Tranos PG, Rubin GS, Adams ZC, Charteris DG. Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:559-562.
16. Cahill MT, Stinnett SS, Banks AD, Freedman SF, Toth CA. Quality of life after macular translocation with 360 degrees peripheral retinectomy for age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:144-151.
17. Pelli DG, Robson G, Wilkins AJ. The designed of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vision Sci. 1988;2:187-199.
18. Maeda N, Sato S, Watanabe H, et al. Prediction of letter contrast sensitivity using videokeratographic indices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:759-763.
19. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL. Improving the reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. Clin Vision Sci. 1991;6:471-475.
20. Matsumoto C, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y. Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4012-4016.
21. Arimura E, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y. Retinal contraction and metamorphopsia scores in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2961-2966.
22. Suzkamo Y, Oshika T, Yuzawa M, et al. Psychometric properties of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:65.
23. Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Grassi M, Green JL, Jager RD, Miller L. Vision-related quality of life in patients with diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:89-92.
24. Oshika T. Quantitative assessment of quality of vision (in Japanese). Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004;108:770-807.
25. Ishii K, Kabata T, Oshika T. The impact of cataract surgery on cognitive impairment and depressive mental status in elderly patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:404-409.
26. Belfort R, Campos M, Hoexter MQ, Belfort R Jr, Mari Jde J. The impact of photorefractive excimer laser keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on visual quality and life in patients with ametropias (in Portuguese). Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71:83-89.
27. Nichols JJ, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2313-2318.
28. Gupta OP, Brown GC, Brown MMA. Value-based medicine costutility analysis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:923-928.
29. Miskala PH, Hawkins BS, Mangione CM, et al. and the Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to changes in visual acuity: findings in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization: SST Report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:531-539.
30. Cassard SD, Patrick DL, Damiano AM, et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14: an index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1508-1513.
31. Owsley C, Sloane ME. Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of "real-world" targets. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71:791-796.
32. Lennerstrand G, Ahlstrom CO. Contrast sensitivity in macular degeneration and the relation to subjective visual impairment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989;67:225-233.
33. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, Fried LP. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:750-760.
34. Leat SJ, Woodhouse JM. Reading performance with low vision aids: relationship with contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:9-16.
35. Carta A, Braccio L, Belpoliti M, et al. Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:506-511.
36. Maguire M. Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Research Group. Baseline characteristics, the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire, and their associations in the Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT). Ophthalmology. 2004;111: 1307-1316.