Bone formation around one-stage implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: Human histologic results at 4 weeks

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 607-613

  Degidi, Marco ^a,b   Piattelli, Adriano ^b   Shibli, Jamil A ^c,d   Perrotti, Vittoria ^b   Iezzi, Giovanna ^b  

^a University of Chieti Pescara ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c Department of Periodontology   (Brazil)

^d GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DEVICE REMOVAL; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WETTABILITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WETTABILITY;

EID: 77449095569     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. De Smet E, Jaecques S, Vandamme K, Vander Sloten J, Naert I. Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bicortical guinea-pig model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 402-407.
2. Abrahamson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 381-392.
3. Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, Stegenga B, van der Reijden WA. Feasibility and influence of the microgap of two implants placed in a non-submerged procedure: A five-year follow-up clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006;77: 1051-1060.
4. Buser D, Merickse-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13: 153-161.
5. Vernino AR, Kohles SS, Holt RA Jr, Lee HM, Caudill RF, Kenealy JN. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: A histologic comparison in baboons. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22: 399-407.
6. Sullivan D, Vincenzi G, Feldman S. Early loading of Osseotite implants 2 months after placement in the maxilla and mandible: A 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 905-912.
7. Testori T, Galli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Esposito M. Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: 1-year results from a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 815-822.
8. Cooper LF, Ellner S, Moriarty J, et al. Threeyear evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 791-800.
9. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acidetched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandibl. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 142-149.
10. Germanier Y, Tosatti S, Broggini N, Textor M, Buser D. Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 251-257.
11. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83: 529-533.
12. Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acidetched surface. J Periodontol 2007;78: 974-982.
13. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 631-638.
14. Nordin T, Graf J, Frykholm A, Helldén L. Early functional loading of sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) Straumann implants following immediate placement in maxillary extraction sockets. Clinical and radiographic result. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18: 441-451.
15. Quinlan P, Nummikoski P, Schenk R, et al. Immediate and early loading of SLA ITI single-tooth implants: An in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 360-370.
16. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 2004;25: 1429-1438.
17. Papalexiou V, Novaes AB Jr, Grisi MFM, Souza SS, Taba M Jr, Kajiwara JK. Influence of implant microstructure on the dynamics of bone healing around immediate implants placed into periodontally infected sites. A confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 44-53.
18. Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 657-666.
19. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34: 78-86.
20. Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, Berglundh T. Healing at fluoride-modified implants placed in wide marginal defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 153-159.
21. Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ("beyond platform switch") retrieved from man after 4 weeks: A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 276-282.
22. Kim H, Choi SH, Ryu JJ, Koh SY, Park JH, Lee IS. The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants. Biomed Mater 2008;3: 25011.
23. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Quaranta M. Highprecision, cost-effective cutting system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 577-579.
24. Misch CE. Bone density: A key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE (ed). Dental Implant Prosthetics. St Louis: Mosby, 2005: 130-141.
25. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78: 291-297.
26. Schwarz F, Sager M, Ferrari D, Herten M, Wieland M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35: 64-75.
27. Iezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: A histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. J Oral Implantol 2005;31: 225-233.
28. Degidi M, Scarano A, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Histologic analysis of an immediately loaded implant retrieved after 2 months. J Oral Implantol 2005;31: 247-254.
29. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Gehrke P, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 763-768.
30. Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: A randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 755-760.
31. Di Iorio D, Traini T, Degidi M, Caputi S, Neugebauer J, Piattelli A. Quantitative evaluation of the fibrin clot extension on different implant surfaces in man: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74: 636-642.