International publication output and research impact in social sciences: Comparison of the universities of vienna, zurich and oslo

Research Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 221-232

  Gorraiz, Juan ^a   Greil, Michael ^a   Mayer, Wolfgang ^a   Reimann, Ralph ^a   Schiebel, Edgar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77449085728     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820209X470554     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Archambault, É, É Vignola-Gagné, G Côté, V Lariviére and Y Gingras 2006. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: the limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68, 329-342.
2. Banks, M G 2006. An extension of the Hirsch index: indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69, 161.
3. Braun, T 2005. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist, 19, 8.
4. Buela-Casal, G, O Gutiérrez-Martínez, M P Bermúdez-Sánchez and O Vadillo-Munoz 2007. Comparative study of international aca- demic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71, 349-365.
5. Glänzel, W and B Thijs 2004. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics, 59, 281-310.
6. Kopcsa, A and E Schiebel 1998. Science and technology map- ping: a new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 7-17.
7. Larivière, V, E Archambault, Y Gingras and E Vignola-Gagné 2006. The place of serials in referencing practices: comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 997-1004.
8. Melin, G and O Persson 1996. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377.
9. Moed, H F 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. New York: Springer.
10. Moed, H F 2006. Bibliometric rankings of world universities. CWTS Report 2006-01.
11. Moed, H F, W J M Burger, J G Frankfort and A F J van Raan 1985. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131-149.
12. Newman, M E J 2004. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5200-5205.
13. Small, H G 1981. The relationship of information science to the social sciences: a co-citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 17, 39-50.
14. Van Leeuwen, T 2006. The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66, 133-154.
15. White, H D 1990. Author co-citation analysis: overview and de- fence. In Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, ed. C L Borgman, pp. 84-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.