Bone response to a novel highly porous surface in a canine implantable chamber

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 387-391

  Frenkel, Sally R ^a   Jaffe, William L ^a   Dimaano, Fred ^b   Iesaka, Kazuho ^a   Hua, Tian ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Biomechanics; Implant design

Indexed keywords

COBALT; HIP PROSTHESES; HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); POROSITY; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE TREATMENT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TITANIUM;

BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; SERVO-HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENTS;

BONE;

CHROMIUM; COBALT; HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE GROWTH; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; INTEGRATION; MATERIAL COATING; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CHROMIUM; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COBALT; DIFFUSION CHAMBERS, CULTURE; DOGS; DURAPATITE; FEMUR; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POROSITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 7744242870     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30104     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Frenkel SR, Jaffe WL, Della Valle C, Jazrawi L, Maurer S, Baitner A, Wright K, Sala D, Hawkins M, Di Cesare PE. The effect of Alendronate (Fosamax™) and implant surface on bone integration and remodeling in a canine model. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2001;58:645-650.
2. Suganuma J, Alexander H. Biological response of intramedullary bone to poly-L-lactic acid. J Appl Biomater 1993;4:13-28.
3. Spivak JM, Ricci JL, Blumenthal NC, Alexander H. A new canine model to evaluate the biological response of intramedullary bone to implant materials and surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1121-1149.
4. Choueka J, Charvet JL, Koval KJ, Alexander H, James KS, Hooper KA, Kohn J. Canine bone response to tyrosine-derived polycarbonates and poly(L-lactic acid). J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:35-41.
5. Frenkel SR, Simon J, Alexander H, Dennis M, Ricci JL. Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: Effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2002;63:706-713.
6. Keaveny TM, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of cortical and trabecular bone. Bone 1993;7:285-344.
7. Black J. "Push-out" tests (editorial). J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1243.
8. Geesink RGT, De Groot K, Klein CP. Chemical implant fixation using hydroxyl-apatite coatings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;225:147-170.
9. Cook SD, Thomas KA, Dalton JE, Volkman TK, Whitecloud TS, Kay JF. Hydroxylapatite coating of porous implants improves bone ingrowth and interface attachment strength. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:989-994.
10. Jansen JA, van der Waerden CP, Wolke JG. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of the bone reaction to 3 different titanium alloy and hydroxyapatite coated implants. J Appl Biomater 1993;4:213-219.
11. Jasty M, Bragdon CR, Zalenski E, O'Connor D, Page A, Harris WM. Enhanced stability of uncemented canine femoral components by bone ingrowth into the porous coatings. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:106-113.
12. Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Patron LP, Barrack RL. The effect of demineralized bone matrix gel on bone ingrowth and fixation of porous implants. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:402-408.