Self-assessment of interpersonal schemas using the relationship patterns questionnaire: A quantitative approach

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 435-452

  Körner, Annett ^a   Drapeau, Martin ^b   Perry, J Christopher ^b   Kurth, Regina A ^c   Pokorny, Dan ^d   Geyer, Michael ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMPIRICISM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 7744237991     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptr/kph036     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Albani, C., Benninghofen, D., Blaser, G., Cierpka, M., Dahlbender, R. W., Geyer, M., et al. (1997). Bericht an die DFG über das Projekt. "Das Repertoire der ü bertragungsbereitschaften von psychoneurotisch-psychosomatisch gestö rten jüngeren Frauen [Report to the DFG about the study " the repertoire of transference dispositions of young women presenting with psychosomatic and psychoneurotic complaints]. Unpublished manuscript, Universitäten Leipzig, Ulm, and Göttingen.
2. Barber, J. P., Foltz, C., & Weinryb, R. M. (1998). The central relationship questionnaire: Initial report. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 131-142.
3. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
4. Benjamin, L. S. (1984). Principles of prediction using structural analysis of social behavior. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. J. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 121-174). New York: Academic Press.
5. Berth, H. (1999). Deutsch-deutsche Vergleiche: Psychologische Untersuchungen 10 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall [German-German comparisons: Psychological investigations ten years after the wall came down, 1st ed.]. Berlin: Verlag für Wiss und Forschung.
6. Caspar, F. (1995). Plan analysis. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
7. Caspar, F. (1997). Plan analysis. In T. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapeutic case formulations (pp. 260-288). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Dahl, H. (1988). Frames of mind. In H. Dahl, H. Kächele, & H. Thomä (Eds.), Psychoanalytic process research strategies (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer.
9. Erikson, E. H. (1985). The life circle completed: A review New York: W. W. Norton.
10. Freud, S. (1905). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie [Three essays on the theory of sexuality]. In Gesammelte Werke (pp. 34-58). London: Imago.
11. Freud, S. (1915). Triebe und Triebschicksale [Instincts and their vicissitudes]. In Gesammelte Werke (pp. 215-227). London: Imago.
12. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie [Psychological Therapy]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
13. Hessel, A., Geyer, M., Plöttner, G., & Brähler, E. (1999). Soziale Unterstützung bei Ost- und Westdeutschen [Social support in East and West Germans]. In A. Hessel, M. Geyer, & E. Brähler (Eds.), Gewinne und Verluste sozialen Wandels: Globalisierung und deutsche Wieder-vereinigung aus psychosozialer Sicht [Gains and losses of social changes. Globalisation and German reunification from a psychosocial point of view] (pp. 171-181), Opladen, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
14. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
15. Klein, M. (1937). Love, guilt and reparation. In M. Khan (Ed.), Love, guilt, reparation and other works (pp. 306-343). London: Hogarth.
16. Klein, M. (1946). Notes sur quelques mécanismes schizoïdes. In M. Khan (Ed.), Développements de la Psychanalyse (pp. 274-300). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
17. Kleiß, M., Blaser, G., & Pokorny, D. (1996, June). Reliability of video versus transcript-CCRT-ratings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Lago di Como.
18. Koch, A. (1997). ADM-Design und Einwohner-melderegister-Stichprobe. Stichproben bei mündlichen Bevölkerungsumfragen [ADM-Design and resident register sample. Samples in oral population surveys]. In S. Gabler & J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik (Eds.), Stichproben in der Umfragepraxis [Samples in survey practice] (pp. 99-116). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
19. Körner, A., Drapeau, M., Perry, J. C., & Geyer, M. (2004). The impact of interpersonal relationships on health in a representative population sample. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Körner, A., Geyer, M., & Brähler, E. (2002). Das NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) - Validierung anhand einer deutschen Bevölkerungsstichprobe [The German validation of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory]. Diagnostica, 48, 19-27.
21. Krause, R. (1999). Neuronenmetaphem, die kurative Beziehung und die Behandlungstechnik [Neuron metaphors, curing relationship and treatment technique]. Psychotherapeutics, 44, 384-385.
22. Kurth, R. A., Körner, A., Geyer, M., & Pokorny, D. (2004). Relationship Patterns Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 418-434.
23. Kurth, R. A., & Pokorny, D. (1999). Der Beziehungs-Muster Fragebogen - BeMus [The Relationship Patterns Questionnaire - RPQ]. Unpublished manuscript, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.
24. Kurth, R. A., Pokorny, D., Körner, A., & Geyer, M. (2002). Der Beziehungs-Muster Fragebogen (BeMus): Validierung anhand einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe [The Relationship Patterns Questionnaire (RPQ): Validation by using a representative sample]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, 52, 179-188.
25. Kurth, R. A., Pokorny, D., Kriebel, R., Paar, G. H., & Dahlbender, R. W. (1999). Selbsteinschätzung von Beziehungsmustern: Der ZMBM (Zwischenmenschliche Beziehungs-Muster) Fragebogen [Self-Evaluation of Relationship Patterns: The IRP (Interpersonal Relationship Patterns) Questionnaire]. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 35, 321-337.
26. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Luborsky, L. (1977). Measuring a pervasive psychic structure in psychotherapy: The core conflictual relationship theme. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures (pp. 367-395). New York: Plenum Press.
28. Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1997). Understanding transference - The core conflictual relationship theme method (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: APA Books.
29. Margraf, J. (1996). Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie [Behavioral therapy]. (Vols. 1 & 2) Berlin: Springer.
30. Perry, J. C. (1989). Assessing psychodynamic conflicts: I. Reliability of the ideographic conflict formulation method. Psychiatry, 52, 289-301.
31. Perry, J. C. (1990). Defense Mechanism Rating Scales - DMRS. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Hospital.
32. Perry, J. C. (1997). Manual for the wishes and fears rating (3rd ed.), Montréal: McGill University & Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry/Jewish General Hospital.
33. Petzold, H. (1980). Die Rolle des Therapeuten und die therapeutische Beziehung [The role of the therapist and the therapeutic relationship] (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Paderborn: Junfermann.
34. Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1985). Lehrbuch der psychoanalytischen Therapie. Grundlagen [Psychoanalytic therapy] (1st ed.). Berlin: Springer.
35. Zander, B., Strack, M., Cierpka, M., Reich, G., & Staats, H. (1995). Coder agreement using the German edition of Luborsky's CCRT method in videotaped or transcribed RAP interviews. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 231-236.