Plant density affects the reliability of using F1 and F 2 yield to predict F3 yield in barley

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 961-965

  Kotzamanidis, S Th ^a   Roupakias, D G ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS   (Greece)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

F3 population; Hordeum vulgare; Prediction

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; DESIGN; FORECASTING METHOD; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 7744235048     PISSN: 00049409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AR03235     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Atkins RE, Murphy HC (1949) Evaluation of yield potentialities of oat crosses from bulk hybrid tests. Agronomy Journal 41, 41-45.
2. Batzios DR, Roupakias DG (1997) HONEY: a microcomputer program for honeycomb design analysis. Crop Science 37, 744-747.
3. Briggs KG, Shebeski LH (1968) Implications concerning the frequency of control plots in wheat breeding nurseries. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 48, 149-153.
4. Fasoulas AC, Fasoula VA (1995) Honeycomb selection designs. Plant Breeding Reviews 13, 87-139.
5. Fowler WL, Heyne EG (1955) Evaluation of bulk hybrid tests for predicting performance of pure line selections in hard red winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 47, 430-434.
6. Hamblin J, Evans AM (1976) The estimation of cross yield using early generation and parental yields in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 25, 515-520.
7. Harrington JB (1940) Yielding capacity of wheat crosses as indicated by bulk hybrid tests. Canadian Journal of Research Selection, C-Botanical Science 18, 578-584.
8. Iliades EC, Roupakias DG, Goulas CK (2003) Effectiveness of honeycomb selection for yield superiority at three interplant distances: a yield simulation study using chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) inbred lines. Euphytica 133, 299-311. doi: 10.1023/A:1025757817020
9. Immer FR (1941) Relation between yielding ability and homozygosis in barley crosses. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 33, 200-206.
10. Lupton FGH (1965) Studies in the breeding of self-pollination cereals. 5. Use of the incomplete diallel in wheat breeding. Euphytica 14, 331-352.
11. Roupakias D, Zesopoulou A, Kazolea S, Dalkalitses D, Mavromatis A, Lazaridou T (1997) Effectiveness of early generation selection under two plant densities in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Euphytica 93, 63-70. doi: 10.1023/A:1002960208864
12. 4 small-plot yield trials. Prediction of cross performance in barley. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
13. Thurling N, Ratinam M (1987) Evaluation of parent selection methods for yield improvement of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Walp.). Euphytica 36, 913-926.
14. Utz HF, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (2001) Predicting progeny means and variances of winter wheat crosses from phenotypic values of their parents. Crop Science 41, 1470-1478.
15. ∞-variance. Euphytica 44, 95-108.