Dynamic insulin sensitivity index: Importance in diabetes

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Volumn 298, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Pillonetto, Gianluigi ^a   Caumo, Andrea ^b   Cobelli, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bayesian estimation; Diabetes; Insulin resistance; Markov chain Monte Carlo strategy; Model; Parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; INSULIN RELEASE; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TEST MEAL;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; INSULIN; INSULIN RESISTANCE; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77349117981     PISSN: 01931849     EISSN: 15221555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.90340.2008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Avogaro A, Vicini P, Valerio A, Caumo A, Cobelli C. The hot but not the cold MM allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E532-E540, 1996.
2. Barrett PHR, Bell BM, Cobelli C, Golde H, Schumitzky A, Vicini P, Foster D. SAAMII: simulation, analysis and modeling software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. Metabolism 47:484 -492, 1998.
3. Basu A, Dalla Man C, Basu R, Toffolo G, Cobelli C, Rizza RA. Effects of type 2 diabetes on insulin secretion, insulin action, glucose effectiveness, and postprandial glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care 32: 866-872, 2009.
4. Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR, Cobelli C. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 236: E667-E677, 1979.
5. Bergman RN, Bowden CR, Cobelli C. The MM approach to quantifi-cation of factors controlling glucose disposal in man. In: Carbohydrate Metabolism, edited by Cobelli C and Bergman RN. New York: Wiley, 1981.
6. Braun M. Differential Equations and Their Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
7. Carson ER, Cobelli C, Finkenstein L. The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems. New York: Wiley, 1983.
8. Dalla Man C, Caumo A, Cobelli C. The oral glucose MM: estimation of insulin sensitivity from a meal test. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49: 419-429, 2002.
9. Dalla Man C, Yarasheski KE, Caumo A, Robertson H, Toffolo G, Polonsky KS, Cobelli C. Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose MMs: validation against clamp. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E954-E958, 2005.
10. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995.
11. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996.
12. Haffner SM, D'Agostino R Jr, Mykkanen L, Tracy R, Howard B, Rewers M, Selby J, Savage PJ, Saad MF. Insulin sensitivity in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Relationship to cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care 22: 562-568, 1999.
13. Hastings WK. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chain and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97-109, 1970.
14. Mykkanen L, Zaccaro DJ, Hales CN, Festa A, Haffner SM. The relation of proinsulin and insulin to insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in subjects with newly diagnosed type II diabetes: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetologia 42: 1060-1066, 1999.
15. Nolan JJ, Ludvik B, Baloga J, Reichart D, Olefsky JM. Mechanisms of the kinetic defect in insulin action in obesity and NIDDM. Diabetes 46: 994-1000, 1997.
16. Owens DR, Luzio SD, Coates PA. Insulin secretion and sensitivity in newly diagnosed NIDDM caucasians in the UK. Diabet Med 13: S19-S24, 1996.
17. Pillonetto G, Caumo A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. A new dynamic index of insulin sensitivity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53: 369-379, 2006.
18. Pillonetto G, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Numerical non-identifiability regions of the MM of glucose kinetics: superiority of Bayesian estimation. Math Biosci 184: 53-67, 2003
19. I=0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E564-E573, 2002.
20. Pillonetto G, Cobelli C. Predictive power of indices derived from models of biological dynamic systems. Proceed Am Contr Conf, 2008, p. 2124-2129, 2008.
21. Raffael JR, Robbins DC, Norris JM, Boerwinkle E, Defronzo RA, Elbein SC, Fujimoto W, Hanis CL, Kahn SE, Permutt MA, Chiu KC, Cruz J, Ehrmann DA, Robertson RP, Rotter JI, Buse J. The GENNID study: a resource for mapping the genes that cause NIDDM. Diabetes Care 19: 864-872, 1996.
22. Saad MF, Anderson RL, Laws A, Watanabe RM, Kades WW, Chen YDI, Sands RE, Pei D, Savage PJ, Bergman RN. A comparison between the MM and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Diabetes 43: 1114 -1121, 1994.