Conjoint measurement with constraints on attribute levels: A mixture-amount model approach

International Statistical Review

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 167-178

  Raghavarao, Damaraju ^a   Wiley, James B ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

62K99; BIB design; Choice sets; Conjoint analysis; Mixture amount designs; Optimization primary classification: 62K15; Secondary classification: 62K10

Indexed keywords

EID: 77349111069     PISSN: 03067734     EISSN: 17515823     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00077.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adamowicz, W.P., Boxall, M. & Williams, M. (1988). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments Versus Contingent Valuation. Amer. J. Agric. Econom., 80, 64-75.
2. Bradley, M.A. & Gunn, H. (1990). Stated Preference Analysis of Values of Travel Time in the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Rec., 1285, 78-89.
3. Bullock, C.H., Elston, D.A. & Chalmers, N.A. (1998). An Application of Economic Experiments to a L&-Use, Deer Hunting, and Landscape Change in the Scottish Highlands. J. Environ. Manage., 52, 335-351.
4. Cooper, L.G. & Nakanishi, M. (1988). Market-Share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Marketing Effectiveness. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
5. Cornell, J.A. (1981). Experiments with Mixtures. New York: John Wiley.
6. Cornell, J.A. (1990). Experiments with Mixtures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Cox, D.R. (1971). A Note on Polynomial Response Functions for Mixtures. Biometrika, 58, 155-159.
8. Design-Expert (2008). Stat-Ease, Inc. 2021 E. Hennepin Ave., Suite 480, Minneapolis, MN 55413-2726, USA.
9. Fowkes, T. & Wardman, M. (1988). The Design of Stated Preference Travel Choice Experiments. J. Transp. Econom. Policy, 13(1), 27-44.
10. Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint Measurement in Consumer Research: Issues & Outlook. J. Consum. Res., 5(2), 103-120.
11. Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions. J. Marketing, 54(4), 3-19.
12. Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Wind, Y. (2001). Thirty Years of Conjoint Measurement: Reflections and Prospects. Interfaces, 31(3), S56-S73.
13. Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W. & Wedel, M. (2000). The 'No-Choice' Alternative in Conjoint Choice Experiments. Int. J. Market Res., 43(1), 93-106.
14. Haider, W. & Ewing, G.O. (1990). A Model of Tourist Choices of Hypothetical Caribbean Destination. Leisure Sci., 12, 33-47.
15. Hensher, D.A., Barnard P., Milthorpe, F. & Smith, N. (1989). Urban Tollways and the Valuation of Travel Time Savings. Econom. Rec., 66(193), 146-156.
16. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M. & Greene, W.H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Johnson, R.M. & Olberts, K.A. (1991). Using Conjoint Analysis in Pricing Studies: Is One Price Variable Enough? In Proceedings of the American Marketing Association's Advanced Research Technique Forum Conference, pp. 164-173.
18. Kamakura, W.A. & Srivastava, R.K. (1984). Predicting Choice Shares Under Conditions of Brand Interdependence. J. Marketing Res., 21, 420-434.
19. Louviere, J., Hencher, D.A & Swait, J.D. (2000). Stated Choice Models: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Marshall, P. & Bradlow, E.T (2002). A Unified Approach to Conjoint Analysis Models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 97, 674-682.
21. Moore, W.L., Louviere, J.J. & Verma, R. (1999). Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 16(1), 27-39.
22. Oppewal, H. & Holyoake, B. (2004). Bundling and Retail Agglomeration Effects on Shopping Behavior. J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 11, 61-74.
23. Oppewal, H., Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1997). Modelling the Effects of Shopping Centre Size & Store Variety on Consumer Choice Behaviour. Environ. Plan. A, 29, 1073-1090.
24. Piepel, G.F. & Cornell, J.A. (1985). Models for Mixture Experiments When the Response Depends on the Total Amount. Technometrics, 27(3), 219-227.
25. Propper, C. (1995). The Disutility of Time Spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service Waiting Lists. J. Hum. Resour., 30, 677-700.
26. Raghavarao, D. & Padgett, L.V. (2005). Block Designs: Analysis, Combinatorics & Applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publications.
27. Raghavarao, D. & Wiley, J.B. (1998). Estimating Main Effects with Pareto Optimal Subsets. Aust.N.Z.J.Statist., 40(4), 425-432.
28. Ryan, M. & Farrar, S. (2000). Using Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Health Care. B.M.J., 320, 1530-1553.
29. Scheffe, H. (1958). Experiments with Mixtures. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B20, 344-360.
30. Van der Waerden, P., Oppewal, H. & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1993). Adaptive Choice Behaviour of Motorists in Congested Shopping Centre Parking Lots. Transportation, 20, 395-408.