Developing and testing quality indicators of home care in Switzerland;Entwicklung und Erprobung von Qualittsindikatoren für die ambulante Pflege in der Schweiz

Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 106-113

  Burla, L ^a   Schaffert, R ^a   Mylaeus, M ^b   Ruesch P ^a  

^a ZURICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Switzerland)

^b Spitex Verband Schweiz   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Home care; Quality assurance; Quality indicators; RAI HC

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOME CARE; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; SWITZERLAND;

HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HOME CARE SERVICES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 77349089310     PISSN: 09413790     EISSN: 14394421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1233474     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bos JT, Frijters DH, Wagner C, et al. Variations in quality of home care between sites across Europe, as measured by home care quality indicators. Aging clinical and experimental research 2007 19 (4) 323-329
2. Schneekloth U, Wahl HW. Mglichkeiten und Grenzen selbstndiger Lebensführung in privaten Haushalten (MuG III) Berlin: Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend 2005
3. Mohrmann M, Lotz-Metz G, Hannes T, et al. Qualittsprüfungen ambulanter Pflegedienste in Baden-Württemberg berblick über die Erfahrungen aus 6 Jahren flchendeckender Untersuchungen durch den MDK. Gesundheitswesen 2005 67 694-700
4. Schneekloth U. Entwicklungstrends und Perspektiven in der huslichen Pflege. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 2006 39 (6) 405-412
5. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Spitex-Statistik 2006 Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen 2007
6. Gmür R, Rüfennacht M. Spitex. In: Kocher G, Oggier W, Hrsg Gesundheitswesen Schweiz 20072009. Eine aktuelle bersicht Bern: Verlag Hans Huber 2007 353-364
7. Hpflinger F, Hugentobler V. Pflegebedürftigkeit in der Schweiz. Prognosen und Szenarien für das 21. Jahrhundert Bern: Huber (Buchreihe des Schweizer Gesundheitsobservatoriums) 2003
8. Hpflinger F, Hugentobler V. Familiale, ambulante und stationre Pflege im Alter. Perspektiven für die Schweiz Bern: Huber (Buchreihe des Schweizer Gesundheitsobservatoriums) 2005
9. Anliker M, Bartelt G, DuPasquier JN, et al. Handbuch RAI-Home-Care Schweiz St. Gallen: Q-Sys AG 2003
10. Hirdes JP, Fries BE, Morris JN, et al. Home care quality indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. Gerontologist 2004 44 (5) 665-679
11. Landi F, Tua E, Onder G, et al. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Medical care 2000 38 (12) 1184-1190
12. Morris J, Fries B. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. Journal of American Geriatric Society 1997 45 (8) 1017-1024
13. Engel K. Das Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Anwendung des Instrumentes als Qualittsinstrument in der Pflege Gesundheitswesen 2004 66 (Session Stationre Versorgung (MDK I))
14. Rantz MJ, Popejoy L, Mehr DR, et al. Verifying nursing home care quality using minimum data set quality indicators and other quality measures. Journal of nursing care quality 1997 12 (2) 54-62
15. Zimmerman DR. Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 2003 18 (3) 250-257
16. Hirdes JP, Fries BE, Morris JN, et al. InterRAI Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) for MDS-HC Version 2.0. Report Ann Arbor, Michigan: interRAI University of Michigan 2001
17. Dalby DM, Hirdes JP. The relationship between agency characteristics and quality of home care. Home health care services quarterly 2008 27 (1) 59-74
18. Dalby DM, Hirdes JP, Fries BE. Risk adjustment methods for Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) based on the minimum data set for home care. Bmc Health Services Research 2005 5 (1) 7
19. Blicke C. Ist gute Pflege messbar? Ergebnisqualitt in der Pflege. Deutscher Pflegekongress/Hauptstadtkongresses Berlin 2007
20. Aud MA, Rantz MJ, Zwygart-Stauffacher M, et al. Developing a care facility residential version of the observable indicators of nursing home care quality instrument. Journal of nursing care quality 2004 19 (1) 48-57
21. Berg K, Fries BE, Jones R, et al. Identification and evaluation of existing quality indicators that are appropriate for use in long-term care settings. Report Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Institute of Gerontology 2001
22. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, et al. Improving the quality of health care: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. British Medical Journal 2006 326 816-819
23. Mor V, Angelelli J, Jones R, et al. Inter-rater reliability of nursing home quality indicators in the U. S. BMC Health Services Research 2003 3 (1) 20
24. Morris J, Moore T, Jones R, et al. Validation of long-term and post-acute care quality indicators. Final report Providence, Rhode Island USA: Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research 2003
25. Phillips C, Branch L. Validating nursing home quality indicators: Contrasting approaches and strategies. Gerontologist 2003 43 482-483
26. Rantz MJ, Mehr DR, Petroski GF, et al. Initial field testing of an instrument to measure: Observable indicators of nursing home care quality. Journal of nursing care quality 2000 14 (3) 1-12
27. Saliba D, Schnelle JF. Indicators of the quality of nursing home residential care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002 50 (8) 1421-1430
28. Delbecq AL, van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes Glenview Scott, Foresman 1975
29. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American journal of public health 1984 74 (9) 979-983
30. Fisch R, Beck D. bersicht ausgewhlter Verfahren und Werkzeuge zur Entscheidungsunterstützung Speyer: Forschungsinstitut für ffentliche Verwaltung 2001
31. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995 311 (7001) 376-380
32. van Teijlingen E, Pitchforth E, Bishop C, et al. Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 2006 32 (4) 249-252
33. Wirtz M, Kutschmann M. Analyse der Beurteilerübereinstimmung für kategoriale Daten mittels Cohens Kappa und alternativer Masse. Rehabilitation 2007 46 370-377
34. Cichetti D.V.,. Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 1994 6 284-290