Flux-informed remediation decision making

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 36-45

  Suthersan, Suthan ^a   Divine, Craig ^b   Quinnan, Joseph ^c   Nichols, Eric ^d  

^a Arcadis G and M Inc   (United States)

^b ARCADIS   (United States)

^c ARCADIS Inc   (United States)

^d ARCADIS US Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; DECISION MAKING; FLUX MEASUREMENT; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION;

EID: 77349084412     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01274.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bauer S, Bayer-Raich M, Holder T, Kolesar C, Muller D, Ptak T. Quantification of groundwater contamination in an urban area using integral pumping tests. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2004, 75:183-213.
2. Bockelmann A, Zamifirescu D, Ptak T, Grathwohl P, Teutsch G. Quantification of mass fluxes and natural attenuation rates at an industrial site with limited monitoring network: a case study. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2003, 60:97-121.
3. Brusseau ML, DiFilippo EL, Marble JC, Oostrom M. Mass-removal and mass-flux-reductions behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1511-1521.
4. Butler JJ. Pumping tests for aquifer evaluation-time for a change? Ground Water 2009, 47(5):615-617. no., doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00488.x
5. Falta RW. Modeling sub-grid-block-scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) pool dissolution using a dual-domain approach. Water Resources Research 2003, 39. no. 12: 1360, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002351
6. Gillham RW, Sudicky EA, Cherry JA, Frind EO. An advection-diffusion concept for solute transport in heterogeneous unconsolidated geological deposits. Water Resources Research 1984, 20(3):369-378. no.
7. Jackson RE. DNAPL remediation: which " new paradigm" will prevail? Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 2001, 21:54-58.
8. Kavanaugh MC, Rao PSC. The DNAPL remediation challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? 2003, Ada, Oklahoma, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-03/143
9. Liu G, Butler JJ, Bohling GC, Reboulet E, Knobbe S, Hyndman DW. A new method for high-resolution characterization of hydraulic conductivity. Water Resources Research 2009, 45. W08202, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008319
10. Nandita BB, Rao PSC, Poyer IC, Annable MD, Hatfield K. Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 86:105-127.
11. Nichols EM. In a State of (Mass) Flux. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 2004, 24(3):4-5.
12. Parker BL, Chapman SW, Guilbeault MA. Plume persistence caused by back diffusion from thin clay layers in a sand aquifer following TCE source-zone hydraulic isolation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2008b, 102:86-104.
13. Parker JC, Park E, Tang G. Dissolved plume attenuation with DNAPL source remediation, aqueous decay and volatilization - analytical solution, model calibration and prediction uncertainty. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2008a, 102:61-71.
14. Payne F, Quinnan J, Potter S. Remediation Hydraulics 2008, Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press
15. Sale TC, Zimbron JA, Dandy DS. Effects of reduced contaminant loading on downgradient water quality in an idealized two-layer granular porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2008, 102:72-85.
16. Rao PSC, Jawitz JW. Comment on " Steady state mass-transfer from single-component dense nonaqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields" by T.C. Sale, D.B. McWhorter. Water Resources Research 2003, 39:1068-1070.
17. Sale TC, McWhorter DB. Steady state mass-transfer from single-component dense nonaqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields. Water Resources Research 2001, 37:393-404.
18. van Genuchten MTh, Wierenga PJ. Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I. Analytical solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1976, 40:473-480.
19. Yeh TCJ, Lee CH. Time to change the way we collect and analyze data for aquifer characterization. Ground Water 2007, 45(no. 2):116-118. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6548.2006.00292.x
20. Zeru A, Schafer G. Analysis of groundwater contamination using concentration-time series recorded during an integral pumping test: bias introduced by strong concentration gradients with the plume. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2005, 81:106-124.