A birth of twins-one boy and one girl-from a single embryo transfer and a possible natural pregnancy

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 9-10, 2009, Pages 553-554

  Kyono, Koichi ^a   Nakajo, Yukiko ^a   Nishinaka, Chikako ^a   Araki, Yasuhisa ^b   Doshida, Masakazu ^a   Toya, Mayumi ^a   Kanto, Satoru ^a  

^a Kyono ART Clinic   (Japan)

^b Institute for ARMT   (Japan)

Author keywords

A birth; A single embiyo transfer (SET); Different sex infants; Dizygotic twins; Natural pregnancy

Indexed keywords

GONADORELIN AGONIST;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLASTOCYST; BODY HEIGHT; CASE REPORT; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; KARYOTYPE 46,XX; KARYOTYPE 46,XY; MALE; NEWBORN; OOCYTE MATURATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TWIN PREGNANCY; VITRIFICATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC;

EID: 77249178669     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9348-0     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bergh C. Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 323-327
2. 2. Schachter M, Raziel A, Friedler S, Strassburger D, Bem O, Ron-El R. Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 1264-1269 (Pubitemid 32544702)
3. 3. Alikani M, Cekleniak NA, Walters E, Cohen J. Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: an analysis of 81 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 1937-1943 (Pubitemid 37107572)
4. Edwards RG, Mettler L, Walters DE. Identical twins and in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986; 3: 114-117
5. 5. Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Behr B, Giudice LC, Westphal LM. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: 503-506 (Pubitemid 36293442)