Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS)

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 9-10, 2009, Pages 487-502

  Summers, Michael C ^a,c   Foland, Andrew D ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hypergeometric statistics; Mathematical modeling; Preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOSAICISM; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOMERES; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOSAICISM; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 77249135783     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9352-4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Munné S, Grifo J, Cohen J, Weier H. Chromosome abnormalities in human arrested preimplantation embryos: a multiple probe FISH study. Am J Hum Genet. 1994; 55:150-159 (Pubitemid 24242395)
2. Munné S, Daily T, Sultan KM, Cohen J. The use of fist polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod. 1995; 10:1014-1020
3. Munné S, Marquez C, Reing A, Garrisi J, Alikani M. Chromosome abnormalities in embryos obtained after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm, injection. Fertil Steril. 1998; 69:904-908
4. Munné S, Magli C, Bahce M, Fung J, Legator M, Morrison L, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenat Diagn. 1998; 18:1459-1466
5. Harper JC, Dawson K, Delhanty JDA, Winston RML. The use of fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for analysis of in-vitro fertilization embryos: a diagnostic tool for the infertile couple. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10:3255-3258 (Pubitemid 26026534)
6. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 183:S29-34.
7. Abdelhadi I, Colls P, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes. Repro Biomed Online. 2003; 6:226-231 (Pubitemid 36857154)
8. Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2617-2621
9. Munné S, Lee A, Rozenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2185-2191 (Pubitemid 24012822)
10. Munné M, Magli C, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S, Gianaroli L, et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2191-2199 (Pubitemid 29425399)
11. Munné S, Mireia S, Escudero T, Velilla E, Walmsley R, Sadowy S, et al. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of anueploidy. Repro Biomed. Online. 2003;7:91-97
12. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP, Munné S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:837-844 (Pubitemid 29505447)
13. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2849-2858 (Pubitemid 40028958)
14. Mastenbrock. S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9-17.
15. Cohen J, Munné S. Two-cell biopsy and PGD outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20:2363-2364
16. Wilton LJ. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1770.
17. Handyside A, Thornhill AR. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1770.
18. Cohen J, Wells D, Munné S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embiyos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87:496-503. (Pubitemid 46389618)
19. Munné S, Cohen J, Simpson JL. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357: 1769-1770
20. Munné S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I, Magli C, Sandalinas M, Grifo J, et al. Substandard application of preimplantation genetic Screening may interfere with its clinical success. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:781-784 (Pubitemid 47498398)
21. Munné S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted, reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2009; Article in press.
22. Simpson JL. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2179-2181
23. Hadarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, Hillensjo T, Nilsson L, Stevic J, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2806-2812
24. Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, Haentjens P, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I, et al. Pre-implantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2818-2825
25. Jansen RPS, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:1476-1478
26. Mersereau JE, Pergament E, Xhang X, Milad MP. Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90:1287-1289
27. Shahine LK, Cedars MI. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85:51-56
28. Donoso P, Staessen C, Fauser BCLM, Devroey P. Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF. Hum Reprod. Update. 2007; 13:15-25.
29. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Preimplantation genetic screening: "established" and ready for prime time? Fertil Steril. 2008; 89:780-788
30. Yakin K, Urman B. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1686-1690 (Pubitemid 352020027)
31. Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou PN, Traeger-Synodinos J, Sermon K, Harper JC. ESHRE PGD Consortium data, collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2629-2645
32. Harper JC, Sermon K, Geraedts J, Vesela K, Harton G, Thornhill A, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:478-480
33. Fauser BCJM. Preimplantation genetic screening: the end of an affair? Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2622-2625
34. Mastenbroek S, Scriven P, Twisk M, Vivelle S, Van der Veen F, Repping S. What next for preimplantation screening? More randomized controlled trials needed? Hum. Reprod. 2008;23: 2626-2628
35. Hodges JL, Lehman EL. Basic concepts of probability and statistics. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2004. p. 173-177
36. Alikani M, Calderon G, Tonikin G. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15:2634-2643 (Pubitemid 32000523)
37. Racowsky C, Jackson KV, Cekleniak. NA, Fox JH, Hornstein MD, Ginsburg AS. The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73:558-564 (Pubitemid 30109655)
38. Racowsky C, Combelles CMH, Nureddin A, Pan Y, Finn A, Miles L, et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphologic predictors of embryo viability. Repro Biomed Online. 2003; 6:323-331 (Pubitemid 36849778)
39. Goossens V, De Ryke D, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:481-492 (Pubitemid 351651197)
40. Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, Peeraer K, Vanneste E, Meeuwis L, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at last 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2009; Article in press.
41. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munné S. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92:157-162
42. Miller KA, Li X, Lambrese K, Su J, Treff N, Scott RT. Blastocyst formation rates in chromosomally normal versus abnormal embryos as analyzed by 24 chromosome microarray-based aneuploidy screening (MPGD). Fertil Steril. 2008;90(suppl 1):S346.
43. Papanikolaou EG, D' haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghcm A, et al. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3198-3203
44. Delhanty JDA. Mechanisms of aneuploidy induction in human oogenesis in early development. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 111:237-244
45. Wells D, Delhanty JDA. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000; 6:1055-1062 (Pubitemid 30947686)
46. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human, embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet. 2000;106:210-217 (Pubitemid 30156426)
47. The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Guidelines for good practice PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Repro Biomed Online. 2008; 16:134-147
48. Los JF, Van Opstal D, van der Berg C. The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model. Hum Reprod Update. 2004; 10:79-94. (Pubitemid 38263165)
49. Delhanty JDA, Handyside A. The origin of genetic defects in man and their detection in the preimplantation embryo. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1:201-215
50. Handyside A, Delhanty JDA. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: strategies and surprises. Trends Genet. 1997; 13:270-275 (Pubitemid 27272076)
51. Delhanty JDA, Harper JC, Ao A, Handyside A, Winston RML. Multi-colour FISH detects chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal pre-implantation embryos from fertile patients. Hum Genet. 1997; 99:755-760 (Pubitemid 27243753)
52. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson AO. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 embiyos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15:1781-1786 (Pubitemid 30636069)
53. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type and relevance to embryo outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:413-419 (Pubitemid 34168450)
54. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M, Calderon G, Cohen J, Munné S. Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1954-1958 (Pubitemid 32916228)
55. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. Comprehensive molecular analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2596-2608
56. Hernandez ER. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Beyond aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24:1538-1541
57. Huang A, Adusumalli J, Patel S, Liem J, Williams J, Pisarska MD. Prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism in pregnancies with infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91:2355-11260
58. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American. Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88:1497-1504