Evidence for adverse phonatory change following an inhaled combination treatment

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 75-83

  Erickson, Elizabeth ^a   Sivasankar, Mahalakshmi ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beta agonists; Corticosteroids; Inhaled combination treatments; Voice problems

Indexed keywords

ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; FLUTICASONE, SALMETEROL DRUG COMBINATION; GLUCOCORTICOID; SALBUTAMOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG COMBINATION; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHALATIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONATION; PRESSURE; TIME;

ADMINISTRATION, INHALATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALBUTEROL; ANDROSTADIENES; ASTHMA; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; GLUCOCORTICOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; PHONATION; PRESSURE; TIME FACTORS; VOICE DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77249134581     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0024)     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bond, Z. S., & Moore, T. J. (1994). A note on the acousticphonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech. Speech Communication, 14, 325-337.
2. Bradlow, A.R. (2002). Confluent talker-and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner ( Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 ( pp. 241-273).Berlin, Germany and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1990). Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech. Speech Communication, 9, 485-495.
4. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1991). Word boundary cues in clear speech: A supplementary report. Speech Communication, 10, 335-353.
5. Ferguson, S. H. (2004). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2365-2373.
6. Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 259-271.
7. Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1241-1255.
8. Gay, T. (1968). Effect of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1570-1573.
9. Gay, T. (1970). A perceptual study of American diphthongs. Language and Speech, 13, 65-88.
10. Gayvert, R. T., & Hillenbrand, J. M. (2000). SpeechTool (Version 1.65). [Computer software]. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
11. Hillenbrand, J. M., & Gayvert, R. T. (2005). Open source software for experiment design and control. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 45-60.
12. Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (1995). The effects of speaking rate on the intelligibility of speech for various speaking modes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2982.
13. Lehiste, I., & Peterson, G. E. (1961). Transitions, glides and diphthongs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 268-277.
14. Liu, S., & Zeng, F.-G. (2006). Temporal properties of clear speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 424-432.
15. Matthies, M., Perrier, P., Perkell, J. S., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 340-353.
16. Milenkovic, P. (2000). Time-frequency analysis for 32-bit Windows. [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
17. Moon, S.-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40-55.
18. Perkell, J. S., Zandipour, M., Matthies, M. L., & Lane, H. (2002). Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I: A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1627-1641.
19. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 434-446.
20. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
21. Simpson, A. P. (2001). Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2153-2164.
22. Tasko, S. M., & Westbury, J. R. (2002). Defining and measuring speech movement events. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 127-142.
23. Tjaden, K., & Weismer, G. (1998). Speaking-rate-induced variability in F2 trajectories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 976-989.
24. Weismer, G. (1991). Assessment of articulatory timing. In J. Cooper ( Ed.), Assessment of speech and voice production: Research and clinical applications. NIDCD Monograph Volume 1 ( pp. 84-95). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
25. Weismer, G., & Berry, J. J. (2003). Effects of speaking rate on second formant trajectories of selected vocalic nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3362-3378.
26. Weismer, G., Kent, R. D., Hodge, M., & Martin, R. (1988). The acoustic signature for intelligibility test words. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1281-1291.
27. Westbury, J. R. (1994). X-ray microbeam speech production database user's handbook [Software manual]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Waisman Center.
28. Wouters, J., & Macon, M. W. (2002). Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I: Analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 417-427. (Pubitemid 34093336)