Comparative transcriptome analysis coupled to X-ray CT reveals sucrose supply and growth velocity as major determinants of potato tuber starch biosynthesis

BMC Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Ferreira, Stephanus J ^a   Senning, Melanie ^a   Sonnewald, Sophia ^a   Keßling, Petra Maria ^b   Goldstein, Ralf ^b   Sonnewald, Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS IIS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POTATO STARCH; SUCROSE; TRANSCRIPTOME; PLANT RNA; STARCH; STARCH SYNTHASE;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; GENE EXPRESSION; GROWTH RATE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; POTATO; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RNA ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; X RAY; DNA MICROARRAY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PLANT TUBER;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHOTOPERIOD; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT TUBERS; RNA, PLANT; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; STARCH; STARCH SYNTHASE; SUCROSE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77249131395     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-93     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Kruger NJ. Carbohydrate synthesis and degradation. Plant Metabolism 1997, 83-104. Harlow: Longman, Dennis DT, Turpin DH, Lefebvre DD, Layzell DB.
2. Farrar JF. The whole plant: Carbon partitioning during development. Carbon Partition within and Between Organisms 1992, 163-179. Oxford: Bios Scientific publishers, Pollock CJ, Farrar JF, Gordon AJ.
3. Sweetlove LJ, Kossmann J, Riesmeier JW, Trethewey RN, Hill SA. The control of source to sink carbon flux during tuber development in potato. Plant J 1998, 15:697-706.
4. Zrenner R, Krause KP, Apel P, Sonnewald U. Reduction of the cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in transgenic potato plants limits photosynthetic sucrose biosynthesis with no impact on plant growth and tuber yield. Plant J 1996, 9:671-681. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.9050671.x, 8653116.
5. Riesmeier JW, Willmitzer L, Frommer WB. Evidence for an essential role of the sucrose transporter in phloem loading and assimilate partitioning. EMBO J 1994, 13:1-7. 394773, 8306952.
6. Kühn C, Quick WP, Schulz A, Riesmeier JW, Sonnewald U, Frommer WB. Companion cell-specific inhibition of the potato sucrose transporter SUT1. Plant Cell Enviro 1996, 19:1115-1123.
7. Leggewie G, Kolbe A, Lemoine R, Roessner U, Lytovchenko A, Zuther E, Kehr J, Frommer WB, Riesmeier JW, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR. Overexpression of the sucrose transporter SoSUT1 in potato results in alterations in leaf carbon partitioning and in tuber metabolism but has little impact on tuber morphology. Planta 2003, 217:158-167.
8. Sweetlove LJ, Hill SA. Source metabolism dominates the control of source to sink carbon flux in tuberizing potato plants throughout the diurnal cycle and under a range of environmental conditions. Plant Cell Environ 2000, 23:523-529.
9. Geigenberger P, Stitt M. Diurnal changes in sucrose, nucleotides, starch synthesis and AGPS transcript in growing potato tubers that are suppressed by decreased expression of sucrose phosphate synthase. Plant J 2000, 23:795-806. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00848.x, 10998190.
10. Viola R, Roberts AG, Haupt S, Gazzani S, Hancock RD, Marmiroli N, Machray GC, Oparka KJ. Tuberization in potato involves a switch from apoplastic to symplastic phloem unloading. Plant Cell 2001, 13:385-1398. 10.1105/tpc.13.2.385, 102249, 11226192.
11. Zrenner R, Salanoubat M, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U. Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J 1995, 7:97-107. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07010097.x, 7894514.
12. Fettke J, Albrecht T, Hejazi M, Mahlow S, Nakamura Y, Steup M. Glucose 1-phosphate is efficiently taken up by potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber parenchyma cells and converted to reserve starch granules. New Phytol 2009, 185(3):663-675.
13. Kammerer B, Fischer K, Hilpert B, Schubert S, Gutensohn M, Weber A, Flügge UI. Molecular Characterization of a Carbon Transporter in Plastids from Heterotrophic Tissues: The Glucose 6-Phosphate/Phosphate Antiporter. Plant Cell 1998, 10:105-118. 10.1105/tpc.10.1.105, 143937, 9477574.
14. Tjaden J, Möhlmann T, Kampfenkel K, Henrichs G, Neuhaus HE. Altered plastidic ATP/ADP-transporter acitivity influences potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber morphology, yield and composition of tuber starch. Plant J 1998, 16:531-540.
15. Zhang L, Häusler RE, Greiten C, Hajirezaei MR, Haferkamp I, Neuhaus HE, Flügge UI, Ludewig F. Overriding the co-limiting import of carbon and energy into tuber amyloplasts increases the starch content and yield of transgenic potato plants. Plant Biotechnol J 2008, 6:453-464. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00332.x, 18363632.
16. Tauberger E, Fernie AR, Emmermann M, Renz A, Kossmann J, Willmitzer L, Trethewey RN. Antisense inhibition of plastidial phosphoglucomutase provides compelling evidence that potato tuber amyloplasts import carbon from the cytosol in the form of glucose-6-phosphate. Plant J 2000, 23:43-53. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00783.x, 10929100.
17. Müller-Röber B, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L. Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber storage protein genes. EMBO J 1992, 11:1229-1238. 556571, 1373373.
18. Stark DM, Timmerman KP, Barry GF, Preiss J, Kishore GM. Regulation of the Amount of Starch in Plant Tissues by ADP Glucose Pyrophosphorylase. Science 1992, 258:287-292. 10.1126/science.258.5080.287, 17835129.
19. Sweetlove LJ, Burrell MM, ap Rees T. Starch metabolism in tubers of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum) with increased ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. Biochem J 1996, 320:493-498. 1217957, 8973558.
20. Lloyd JR, Landschütze V, Kossmann J. Simultaneous antisense inhibition of two starch-synthase isoforms in potato tubers leads to accumulation of grossly modified amylopectin. Biochem J 1999, 338:515-521. 10.1042/0264-6021:3380515, 1220080, 10024530.
21. Hovenkamp-Hermelink JHM, Jacobsen E, Ponstein AS, Visser RGF, Vos-Scheperkeuter GH, Bijmolt EW, De Vries JN, Witholt B, Feenstra WJ. Isolation of an amylose-free starch mutant of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor Appl Genet 1987, 75:217-221.
22. Roldán I, Wattebled F, Mercedes Lucas M, Delvallé D, Planchot V, Jiménez S, Pérez R, Ball S, D'Hulst C, Mérida A. The phenotype of soluble starch synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novel function of elongation enzymes in the control of starch granule formation. Plant J 2007, 49:492-504. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02968.x, 17217470.
23. Szydlowski N, Ragel P, Raynaud S, Lucas MM, Roldán I, Montero M, Muñoz FJ, Ovecka M, Bahaji A, Planchot V, Pozueta-Romero J, D'Hulst C, Mérida A. Starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis requires the presence of either class IV or class III starch synthases. Plant J 2009, 21:2443-2457.
24. Kossmann J, Visser RG, Müller-Röber B, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U. Cloning and expression analysis of a potato cDNA that encodes branching enzyme: evidence for co-expression of starch biosynthetic genes. Mol Gen Genet 1991, 230:39-44. 10.1007/BF00290648, 1745241.
25. Schwall GP, Safford R, Westcott RJ, Jeffcoat R, Tayal A, Shi YC, Gidley MJ, Jobling SA. Production of very-high-amylose potato starch by inhibition of SBE A and B. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:551-554. 10.1038/75427, 10802625.
26. Kloosterman BA, Vorst OFJ, Hall RD, Visser RGF, Bachem CWB. Tuber on a chip: differential gene expression during potato tuber development. Plant Biotechnol J 2005, 505-519. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00141.x, 17173637.
27. Han L, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Beaulieu C, Smith. Assessment of common scab-inducing pathogen effects on potato underground organs via computed tomography scanning. Phytopathology 2008, 98:1118-1125. 10.1094/PHYTO-98-10-1118, 18943458.
28. Smith SM, Fulton DC, Chia T, Thorneycroft D, Chapple A, Dunstan H, Hylton C, Zeeman SC, Smith AM. Diurnal changes in the transcriptome encoding enzymes of starch metabolism provide evidence for both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 2004, 136:2687-2699. 10.1104/pp.104.044347, 523333, 15347792.
29. Kloosterman B, De Koeyer D, Griffiths R, Flinn B, Steuernagel B, Scholz U, Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U, Bryan GJ, Prat S, Bánfalvi Z, Hammond JP, Geigenberger P, Nielsen KL, Visser RG, Bachem CW. Genes driving potato tuber initiation and growth: identification based on transcriptional changes using the POCI array. Funct Integr Genomics 2008, 4:329-340.
30. Arce AL, Cabello JV, Chan RL. Patents on plant transcription factors. Recent Pat Biotechnol 2008, 2:209-217. 10.2174/187220808786241024, 19075869.
31. Butelli E, Titta L, Giorgio M, Mock HP, Matros A, Peterek S, Schijlen EG, Hall RD, Bovy AG, Luo J, Martin C. Enrichment of tomato fruit with health-promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1301-1318. 10.1038/nbt.1506, 18953354.
32. Scheidig A, Fröhlich A, Schulze S, Lloyd JR, Kossmann J. Downregulation of a chloroplast-targeted beta-amylase leads to a starch-excess phenotype in leaves. Plant J 2002, 30:581-91. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01317.x, 12047632.
33. Ritte G, Lloyd JR, Eckermann N, Rottmann A, Kossmann J, Steup M. The starch-related R1 protein is an alpha -glucan, water dikinase. PNAS 2002, 10:7166-7171.
34. Baunsgaard L, Lütken H, Mikkelsen R, Glaring MA, Pham TT, Blennow A. A novel isoform of glucan, water dikinase phosphorylates pre-phosphorylated alpha-glucans and is involved in starch degradation in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2005, 9:595-605.
35. Kötting O, Santelia D, Edner C, Eicke S, Marthaler T, Gentry MS, Comparot-Moss S, Chen J, Smith AM, Steup M, Ritte G, Zeeman SC. STARCH-EXCESS4 is a laforin-like Phosphoglucan phosphatase required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21:334-346. 10.1105/tpc.108.064360, 2648081, 19141707.
36. Niittylä T, Messerli G, Trevisan M, Chen J, Smith AM, Zeeman SC. A previously unknown maltose transporter essential for starch degradation in leaves. Science 2004, 303:87-89. 10.1126/science.1091811, 14704427.
37. Chia T, Thorneycroft D, Chapple A, Messerli G, Chen J, Zeeman SC, Smith SM, Smith AM. A cytosolic glucosyltransferase is required for conversion of starch to sucrose in Arabidopsis leaves at night. Plant J 2004, 37:853-863. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2003.02012.x, 14996213.
38. Lloyd JR, Blennow A, Burhenne K, Kossmann J. Repression of a novel isoform of disproportionating enzyme (stDPE2) in potato leads to inhibition of starch degradation in leaves but not tubers stored at low temperature. Plant Physiol 2004, 134:1347-1354. 10.1104/pp.103.038026, 419812, 15034166.
39. Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Günther M, Höhne M, Morcuende R, Osuna D, Thimm O, Usadel B, Scheible WR, Stitt M. Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:3257-3281. 10.1105/tpc.105.035261, 1315368, 16299223.
40. Osuna D, Usadel B, Morcuende R, Gibon Y, Bläsing OE, Höhne M, Günter M, Kamlage B, Trethewey R, Scheible WR, Stitt M. Temporal responses of transcripts, enzyme activities and metabolites after adding sucrose to carbon-deprived Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 2007, 49:463-491. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02979.x, 17217462.
41. Harmer SL, Hogenesch JB, Straume M, Chang HS, Han B, Zhu T, Wang X, Kreps JA, Kay SA. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 2000, 290:2110-2113. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2110, 11118138.
42. Lu Y, Gehan JP, Sharkey TD. Daylength and circadian effects on starch degradation and maltose metabolism. Plant Physiol 2005, 138:2280-2291. 10.1104/pp.105.061903, 1183414, 16055686.
43. Tenorio G, Orea A, Romero JM, Mérida A. Oscillation of mRNA level and activity of granule-bound starch synthase I in Arabidopsis leaves during the day/night cycle. Plant Mol Biol 2003, 51:949-958. 10.1023/A:1023053420632, 12777053.
44. Merida A, Rodri{dotless}guez-Galan JM, Vincent C, Romero JM. Expression of the Granule-Bound Starch Synthase I (Waxy) Gene from Snapdragon Is Developmentally and Circadian Clock Regulated. Plant Physiol 1999, 120:401-409. 10.1104/pp.120.2.401, 59278, 10364391.
45. Dian W, Jiang H, Chen Q, Liu F, Wu P. Cloning and characterization of the granule-bound starch synthase II gene in rice: gene expression is regulated by the nitrogen level, sugar and circadian rhythm. Planta 2003, 218:261-268. 10.1007/s00425-003-1101-9, 12955512.
46. Visser RG, Stolte A, Jacobsen E. Expression of a chimaeric granule-bound starch synthase-GUS gene in transgenic potato plants. Plant Mol Biol 1991, 17:691-699. 10.1007/BF00037054, 1912493.
47. Lohaus G, Winter H, Riens B, Heldt HW. Further studies of the phloem loading process in leaves of barley and spinach - the comparison of the metabolite concentration in the apoplastic compartment with those in the cytosolic compartment and in the sieve tubes. Bot Acta 1995, 108; 270-275.
48. Engels CH, Marschner H. Allocation of photosynthate to individual tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. II. Relationship between growth rate, carbohydrate concentration and 14C-partitioning within tubers. J Exp Bot 1986, 37:1804-1812.
49. Ral JP, Colleoni C, Wattebled F, Dauvillée D, Nempont C, Deschamps P, Li Z, Morell MK, Chibbar R, Purton S, d'Hulst C, Ball SG. Circadian clock regulation of starch metabolism establishes GBSSI as a major contributor to amylopectin synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol 2006, 142:305-317. 10.1104/pp.106.081885, 1557617, 16844835.
50. Rogers LA, Dubos C, Cullis IF, Surman C, Poole M, Willment J, Mansfield SD, Campbell MM. Light, the circadian clock, and sugar perception in the control of lignin biosynthesis. J Exp Bot 2005, 56:1651-1663. 10.1093/jxb/eri162, 15878986.
51. Usadel B, Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Retzlaff K, Höhne M, Günther M, Stitt M. Expression data of Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes in an extended night. , http://mapman.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/supplement/xn/
52. Schwab R, Ossowski S, Riester M, Warthmann N, Weigel D. Highly Specific Gene Silencing by Artificial MicroRNAs in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1121-1133. 10.1105/tpc.105.039834, 1456875, 16531494.
53. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 1962, 15:473-497.
54. Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L. Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 1987, 163:16-20. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90086-8, 2441623.
55. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JA. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, (35 Web Server):W71-74. 10.1093/nar/gkm306, 1933133, 17485472.
56. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time PT-PCR. Nucleic Acid Res 29:2002-2007.
57. Feldkamp LA, Davis L, Kress J. Practical Cone-beam Algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1984, 1:612-619.
58. Hanke R, Fuchs T, Uhlmann N. X-ray based methods for non-destructive testing and material characterization. Nucl Instr and Meth in Phys Res A 2008, 591:14-18.