Defeasible argumentation support for an extended BDI architecture

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4946 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 145-163

  Rotstein, Nicolás D ^a   García, Alejandro J ^a   Simari, Guillermo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

AGENT ARCHITECTURES; BDI ARCHITECTURE; CURRENT SITUATION; DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMMING; DEFEASIBLE REASONING; FILTERING RULES;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 77249114892     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78915-4_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Rotstein, N., García, A., Simari, G.: Reasoning from desires to intentions: A dialectical framework. In: Proceedings of the 22nd. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 136-141 (2007)
2. García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory Practice of Logic Programming 4(1), 95-138 (2004)
3. Lifschitz, V.: Foundations of logic programming. In: Brewka, G. (ed.) Principles of Knowledge Representation. CSLI, pp. 69-127 (1996)
4. Rotstein, N., García, A.: Defeasible reasoning about beliefs and desires. In: Proc. of the 11th NMR, pp. 429-436 (2006)
5. Falappa, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G.: Belief revision, explanations and defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Journal 141, 1-28 (2002)
6. Fuhrmann, A.: An Essay on Contraction. In: Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA (1997)
7. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D., Pollack, M.: Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. In: Cummins, R., Pollock, J.L. (eds.) Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, pp. 1-22. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
8. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3), 261-292 (1998)
9. Thomason, R.: Desires and defaults: A framework for planning with inferred goals. In: Proc. of the seventh KR, pp. 702-713 (2000)
10. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: The boid architecture: conficts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, pp. 9-16. ACM Press, New York (2001)
11. Rahwan, I., Amgoud, L.: An argumentation-based approach for practical reasoning. In: Proc. of the 5th AAMAS (2006)
12. Amgoud, L.: A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 552-563. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
13. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34(1-3), 197-215 (2002)
14. García, A., Rotstein, N., Tucat, M., Simari, G.: An Argumentative Reasoning Service for Deliberative Agents. In: Zhang, Z., Siekmann, J.H. (eds.) KSEM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4798, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)