Dental effects of interceptive orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid population: Interim results from a randomized clinical trial

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 324-333

  Jolley, Cameron J ^a   Huang, Greg J ^b   Greenlee, Geoffrey M ^b   Spiekerman, Charles ^b   Kiyak, H Asuman ^b   King, Gregory J ^b  

^a University of Washington ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; ORTHODONTICS; PEER REVIEW; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAID; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77249114694     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Proffit W.R., Fields Jr. H.W., and Moray L.J. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13 (1998) 97-106
2. Wheeler T.T., McGorray S.P., Yurkiewicz L., Keeling S.D., and King G.J. Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106 (1994) 22-33
3. Okunseri C., Pajewski N.M., McGinley E.L., and Hoffmann R.G. Racial/ethnic disparities in self-reported pediatric orthodontic visits in the United States. J Public Health Dent 67 (2007) 217-223
4. King G.J., Hall C.V., Milgrom P., and Grembowski D.E. Early orthodontic treatment as a means to increase access for children enrolled in Medicaid in Washington state. J Am Dent Assoc 137 (2006) 86-94
5. Im J.L., Phillips C., Lee J., and Beane R. The North Carolina Medicaid program: participation and perceptions among practicing orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 144 (2007) e115-e121
6. Horsley B.P., Lindauer S.J., Shroff B., Tufekci E., Abubaker A.O., Fowler C.E., et al. Appointment keeping behavior of Medicaid vs non-Medicaid orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 (2007) 49-53
7. Theis J.E., Huang G.J., King G.J., and Omnell M.L. Eligibility for publicly funded orthodontic treatment determined by the handicapping labiolingual deviation index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 708-715
8. Mirabelli J.T., Huang G.J., Siu C.H., King G.J., and Omnell L. The effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 592-598
9. Wheeler T.T., McGorray S.P., Dolce C., Taylor M.G., and King G.J. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2002) 9-17
10. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 125-139
11. Draker H.L. Handicapping labiolingual deviations: a proposed index for public health purposes. Am J Orthod 46 (1960) 295-305
12. Glantz S.A. Primer of biostatistics (1987), McGraw Hill, New York
13. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., and Roberts C.T. The PAR index (peer assessment rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 180-187
14. DeGuzman L., Bahiraei D., Vig K.W., Vig P.S., Weyant R.J., and O'Brien K. The validation of the peer assessment rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 172-176
15. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V., Kaczynsk R., and Shunock M. Early treatment outcome assessed by the peer assessment rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 544-550
16. Ngan P., and Yiu C. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 414-420
17. King G.J., McGorray S.P., Wheeler T.T., Dolce C., and Taylor M. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 489-496
18. Kerosuo H., Väkiparta M., Nyström M., and Heikinheimo K. The seven-year outcome of an early orthodontic treatment strategy. J Dent Res 87 (2008) 584-588
19. Worms F.W., Meskin L.H., and Isaacson R.J. Open-bite. Am J Orthod 59 (1971) 589-595
20. Tulloch J.F., Phillips C., and Proffit W.R. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 62-72
21. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 40-50
22. Ghafari J., King G.J., and Tulloch J.F. Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion-comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 107-117
23. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Sanjie Y., Mandall N., Chadwick S., et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 234-243