Secure and efficient protocols for multiple interdependent issues negotiation

Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 175-185

  Fujita, Katsuhide ^a   Ito, Takayuki ^a,b   Klein, Mark ^b  

^a NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT UTILITY FUNCTION; COMMUNICATION COST; MULTI-ISSUE NEGOTIATION; MULTIPLE ISSUE; OPTIMALITY; PRIVATE INFORMATION; RISK ATTITUDE; SECURE PROTOCOLS; UTILITY FUNCTIONS; UTILITY MODEL; WORK FOCUS;

NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 77249114693     PISSN: 10641246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-2010-0449     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Barbuceanu and W.-K. Lo, Multi-attribute utility theoretic negotiation for electronic commerce, In Proc of the AAMAS Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (AMEC- 2000), 2000, 15-30.
2. T. Bosse and C. M. Jonker, Human vs. computer behaviour in multi-issue negotiation, In Proc of 1st InternationalWorkshop on Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS-2005), 2005, 11-24.
3. P. Faratin, C. Sierra and N. R. Jennings, Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations, In Artificial Intelligence 142 (2002), 205-237.
4. S. S. Fatima, M.Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings, In Proc of Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2004), 2004, 1080-1087.
5. S. S. Fatima, M.Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, Approximate and online multi-issue negotiation, In Proc of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi- Agent Systems (AAMAS-2007), 2007, 947-954.
6. K. Fujita, T. Ito, H. Hattori and M. Klein, An approach to implementing a threshold adjusting mechanism in very complex negotiations: A preliminary result, In Proc of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS-2007), 2007, 185-192.
7. K. Fujita, T. Ito and M. Klein, Preliminary result on secure protocols for multiple issue negotiation problems, In Proc of the 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Multi-Agents (PRIMA-2008), 2008, 161-172.
8. K. Fujita, T. Ito and M. Klein, A representative-based multiround protocol for multi-issue negotiations, In Proc of the 7th Inernational Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2008), 2008, 1573-1576.
9. K. Hindriks, C. Jonker and D. Tykhonov, Avoiding approximation errors in multi-issue negotiation with issue dependencies, In Proc of the 1st International Workshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations (ACAN-2008), 2008, 64-71.
10. T. Ito, H. Hattori and M. Klein, Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: Exploring nonlinear utility spaces, In Proc of 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2007), 2007, 1347-1352.
11. M. Klein, P. Faratin, H. Sayama and Y. Bar-Yam, Negotiating complex contracts, Group Decision and Negotiation 12(2) (2003), 58-73.
12. G. Lai, C. Li and K. Sycara,Ageneral model for pareto optimal multi-attribute negotiations, In Proc of the 2nd International Workshop on Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS-2006), 2006, 59-80.
13. G. Lai, K. Sycara and C. Li, A decentralized model for multiattribute negotiations with incomplete information and general utility functions, In Proc of the 2nd International Workshop on Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS-2006), 2006, 39-58.
14. R. J. Lin and S. T. Chou, Bilateral multi-issue negotiations in a dynamic environment, In Proc of the AAMAS Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (AMEC-2003), 2003.
15. Y. Lindell, Composition of Secure Multi-Party Protocols: A Comprehensive Study, Springer, 2003.
16. X. Luo, N. R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, H. Leung and J. H. Lee, A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multiissue negotiations in semi-competitive environments, Artificial Intelligence 148 (2003), 53-102.
17. J. R. V. I. Marsa-Maestre, M. A. Lopez-Carmona and E. de la Hoz, Effective bidding and deal identification for negotiations in highly nonlinear scenarios, In Proc of the 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2009), 2009, 1057-1064.
18. V. Robu and H. L. Poutre, Retrieving the structure of utility graphs used in multi-item negotiation through collaborative filtering of aggregate buyer preferences, In Proc of the 2nd International Workshop on Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS-2006), 2006, 147-168.
19. V. Robu, D. J. A. Somefun and J. L. Poutre, Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs, In Proc of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), 2005, 280-287.
20. S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, 2002, 94-136.
21. A. Shamir, How to share a secret, Commun ACM, 22(11) (1979), 612-613.
22. J. Shew and K. Larson, The blind leading the blind: A thirdparty model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations under incomplete information, In Proc of the 1st InternationalWorkshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations (ACAN-2008), 2008, 24-31.