Optimized U-type designs on flexible regions

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1505-1515

  Lin, D K J ^a   Sharpe, C ^b   Winker, P ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central composite discrepancy; Experimental design; Flexible regions; Threshold Accepting; U type design

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL COMPOSITE; DESIGN POINTS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLEXIBLE REGIONS; HIGH QUALITY; REGION OF INTEREST; THRESHOLD ACCEPTING;

ALGORITHMS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; HEURISTIC METHODS; STATISTICS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77249114269     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.032     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chuang S.C., and Hung Y.C. Uniform design over general input domains with applications to target region estimation in computer experiments. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54 (2010) 219-232
2. Draper N.R., and Guttman I. Response surface designs in flexible regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (1986) 1089-1094
3. Draper N.R., and Lawrence W.E. Designs which minimise model inadequacies: Cuboidal regions of interest. Biometrika 52 (1965) 111-118
4. Draper N.R., and Lawrence W.E. The use of second-order 'spherical' and 'cuboidal' designs in the wrong regions. Biometrika 53 (1966) 496-599
5. Dueck G., and Scheuer T. Threshold accepting. A general purpose optimization algorithm superior to simulated annealing. Journal of Computational Physics 90 (1990) 161-175
6. Fang K.-T. The uniform design: Application of number-theoretic methods in experimental design. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica 3 (1980) 363-372
7. Fang K.-T., Lin D.K.J., Winker P., and Zhang Y. Uniform design: Theory and application. Technometrics 42 (2000) 237-248
8. Fang K.-T., Li R., and Sudjianto A. Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments (2006), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
9. Fang K.-T., Lu X., and Winker P. Lower bounds for centered and wrap-around l2-discrepancy and construction of uniform designs by threshold accepting. Journal of Complexity 19 (2003) 692-711
10. 2-discrepancy of random sampling and latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs. Mathematics of Computation 71 (2002) 275-296
11. Fang K.-T., Maringer D., Tang Y., and Winker P. Lower bounds and stochastic optimization algorithms for uniform designs with three or four levels. Mathematics of Computation 75 254 (2005) 859-878
12. Fang K.-T., and Winker P. Application of threshold accepting to the evaluation of the discrepancy of a set of points. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 34 5 (1997) 2028-2042
13. Gilli M., and Winker P. Editorial-2nd special issue on applications of optimization heuristics to estimation and modelling problems. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52 1 (2007) 2-3
14. Hickernell F.J. A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Mathematics of Computation 67 (1996) 299-322
15. Huang M.-N.L., Lee C.-P., Chen R.-B., and Klein T. Exact D-optimal designs for a second-order response surface model on a circle with qualitative factors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54 2 (2010) 516-530
16. Wang Y., and Fang K.-T. A note on uniform distribution and experimental design. KeXue TongBao 26 (1981) 485-489
17. Winker P. Optimisation Heuristics in Econometrics: Applications of Threshold Accepting (2001), Wiley, Chichester
18. Winker P. The stochastics of threshold accepting: Analysis of an application to the uniform design problem. In: Rizzi A., and Vichi M. (Eds). COMPSTAT 2006, Proceedings in Computational Statistics (2006), Physica, Heidelberg 495-503