Comparing the efficiency of ordinary kriging and cokriging to estimate the Atterberg limits spatially using some soil physical properties

Clay Minerals

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 181-193

  Baskan, O ^a   Erpul, G ^b   Dengiz, O ^c  

^a Institute of Soil and Water Resources Research   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Atterberg limits; Cokriging; Consistency limits; Kriging; Soil water content

Indexed keywords

ATTERBERG LIMITS; CO-KRIGING; CONSISTENCY LIMITS; KRIGING; SOIL WATER CONTENT;

ESTIMATION; GROUNDWATER; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MODELS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOIL MOISTURE; STRAIN ENERGY; UNDERWATER SOILS; WATER CONTENT;

SOIL SURVEYS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ERROR ANALYSIS; GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTY; KRIGING; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77249103680     PISSN: 00098558     EISSN: 14718030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2009.044.2.181     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atterberg A. (1911) Die plastizitat der Tone. Internationale Mitteilungen für Bodenkunde, 1, 10-43.
2. Ball B.C., Campbell D.J. & Hunter E.A. (2000) Soil compactibility in relation to physical and organic properties at 156 sites in UK. Soil & Tillage Research, 57, 83-91.
3. Baver L.D. (1930) The Atterberg consistency constants: factors affecting their values and a new concept of their significance. Journal of the American Societyof Agronomy, 22, 935-948.
4. Bouyoucos G.J. (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. AgronomyJournal , 43, 435-438.
5. Bowles T.E. (1970) Engineering Properties of Soil and Their Measurement. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.
6. Burgess T.M. & Webster R. (1980) Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: II. Block kriging. Journal of Soil Science, 31, 333-341.
7. Canbolat M.Y. & Oztas T. (1997) Factors affecting consistency limits of soil and evaluation of consistency limits for agricultural purposes. Ataturk University, The Journal of The Facultyof Agriculture, 28, 120-129 (in Turkish).
8. Chang Y.H., Scrimshaw M.D., Emmerson R.H.C. & Lester J.N. (1998) Geostatistical analysis of sampling uncertainty at the Tollesbury Managed Retreat site in Blackwater Estuary, Essex, UK: kriging and cokriging approach to minimize sampling density. Science of the Total Environment, 221, 43-57.
9. De Jong E., Acton D.F. & Stonehouse H.B. (1990) Estimating the Atterberg limits of Southern Saskatchewan soils from texture and carbon contents. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 70, 543-554.
10. Ersahin S. (2003) Comparing ordinary kriging and cokriging to estimate infiltration rate. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 67, 1848-1855.
11. Gamma Design (2004) Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences. Version 7.0. Plainwell, Michigan, USA.
12. Goovaerts P. (1997) Geostatistics in soil science: stateof-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma, 89, 1-45.
13. Goovaerts P. (1999) Using elevation to aid the geostatistical mapping of rainfall erosivity. Catena, 34, 227-242.
14. Gotway C.A., Ferguson R.B., Hergert G.W. & Peterson T.A. (1996) Comparison of kriging and inverse distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 60, 1237-1247.
15. Hillel D. (1980) P. 349 in: Fundamentals of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York, USA.
16. Hillel D. (1998) P. 765 in: Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
17. Isaaks H.E. & Srivastava R.M. (1989) P. 561 in: An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
18. Istok J.D., Smyth J.D. & Flint A.L. (1993) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of ground-water contaminant: A case history. Ground Water, 31, 63-74.
19. Jefferson I. & Rogers C.D.F. (1998) Liquid limit and the temperature sensitivity of clays. Engineering Geology, 49, 95-109.
20. Journel A.G. & Huijbregts C.H.J. (1978) P. 600 in: Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London, UK.
21. Klute A. & Dirksen C. (1986) Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. Pp. 687-732 in: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. (A. Klute, editor.). ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph no.9 (2nd edition), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
22. Larney F.J., Fortune R.A. & Collins J.F. (1988) Intrinsic soil physical parameters influencing intensity of cultivation procedures for sugar beet seedbed preparation. Soil & Tillage Research, 12, 253-267.
23. Laslett G.M. (1994) Kriging and splines: An empirical comparison of their predictive performance in some applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 391-409.
24. McBride R.A. (1989) Are-examination of alternative test procedures for soil consistency limit determination: II. A simulated desorption procedure. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 53,1, 84-191.
25. McBride R.A. (1993) Soil consistency limits. Pp. 519-527 in: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (M.R. Carter, editor), Lewis Publications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
26. Mapfumo E. (1997) Soil and Plant Response to Compaction. PhD thesis, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
27. Mapfumo E. & Chanasyk D.S. (1998) Guidelines for safe trafficking and cultivation, and resistancedensity-moisture relations of three disturbed soils from Alberta. Soil & Tillage Research, 46,193-202.
28. Martinez-Cob A. (1996) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of evapotranspiration and precipitation in mountainous terrain. Journal of Hydrology, 174, 19-35.
29. Mitchell J.K. (1993) Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
30. Mueller L., Shindler U., Fausey N.R. & Lal R. (2003) Comparison of methods for estimating maximum soil water content for optimum workability. Soil & Tillage Research, 72, 9-20.
31. Odell R.T., Thornburn T.H. & McKenzie L.J. (1960) Relationships of Atterberg limits to some other properties of Illinois soils. Soil Science Societyof America Proceedings, 24, 297-300.
32. Seed H.B., Woodward R.J. & Lundgren R. (1964) Fundamental Aspects of the Atterberg Limits. Journal Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, A.S.C.E, Vol. 90, No. SM6, pp. 75-105.
33. Shouse P.J., Gerik T.J. Russell W.B. & Cassel D.K. (1990) Spatial distribution of soil particle size and aggregate stability index in a clay soil. Soil Science, 149, 351-360.
34. Smith C.W., Hadas A., Dan J. & Koyumdjisky H. (1985) Shrinkage and Atterberg limits in relation to other properties of principal soil types in Israel. Geoderma, 35, 47-65.
35. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy. A Basic of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Survey. USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington D.C.
36. Sridharan A., Rao S.M. & Murthy N.S. (1986) Liquid limit for montmorillonite soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 9, 156-159.
37. Stein A. & Corsten L.C.A. (1991) Universal kriging and cokriging as a regression procedure. Biometrics, 47, 575-588.
38. Stein A., van Dooremolen W., Bouma J. & Bregt A.K. (1988) Cokriging point data on moisture deficit. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 52, 1418-1423.
39. Terzaghi C. (1926) Simplified soil tests for subgrades and their physical significance. Public Roads, 7, 153-162.
40. Thomas P.J., Baker J.C., Zelazny L.W. & Hatch D.R. (2000) Relationship of Map Unit Variability to Shrink-Swell Indicators. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 64, 262-268.
41. Trangmar B.B., Yost R.J. & Uehara G. (1985) Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Advances in Agronomy, 38, 65-91.
42. Triantafilis J., Odeh I.O.A. & McBratney A.B. (2001) Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 65, 869-878.
43. US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agricultural Handbook, no.60, USDA.
44. Vauclin M., Vieira S.R., Vachaud G. & Nielsen D.R. (1983) The use of cokriging with limited field observations. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 47, 175-184.
45. Vieira S.R., Nielsen D.R. & Biggar J.W. (1981) Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 47, 175-184.
46. Voltz M. & Webster R. (1990) A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information. Journal of Soil Science, 41, 473-490.
47. Webster R. & Oliver M.A. (2001) Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., UK.
48. Yates S.R. & Warrick A.W. (1987) Estimating soil water content using cokriging. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 23-30.
49. Zhang R., Myers D.E. & Warrick A.W. (1992) Estimation of the spatial distribution of the soil chemicals using pseudo cross-variograms. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 56, 1444-1452.
50. Zhang R., Shouse P. & Yates S. (1997) Use of pseudocrossvariograms and cokriging to improve estimates of solute concentrations. Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 61, 1342-1347.