"Empiricism all the way down": A defense of the value-neutrality of science in response to Helen Longino's contextual empiricism

Perspectives on Science

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 189-214

  Ruphy, Stéphanie ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249095930     PISSN: 10636145     EISSN: 15309274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/posc.2006.14.2.189     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, E. 1995. "Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology. " Philosophical Topics vol. 23, n°2: 27-58.
2. Bachelard, G. (1938) 2002. The Formation of The Scientific Mind, trans. M. Mc Allester Jones. Manchester: Clinamen Press.
3. Bourdieu, P. 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d'agir.
4. Daston, L., ed. 2000a. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Daston, L., ed. 2000. "The Coming into Being of Scientific Objects. " In Daston, L., ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-14.
6. De Vorkin, D. H. 1978. "Steps toward the Hertzsprung-Russel diagram. " Physics Today, March 1978: 32-39.
7. Dirac, P. 1963. "The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature. " Scientific American 208, n°5: 45-53.
8. Duhem, P. (1906) 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. P. P. Wiener. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Gould, S. 1986. "Review of Bleier's Science and Gender. " New York Review of Books.
10. Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Kuhn, T. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Levins, R., and R. Lewontin. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
13. Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Longino, H. E. 1992. "Essential Tension-Phase Two: Feminists, Philosophical and Social Studies of Science". In E. McMullin, ed., The Social Dimension of Science. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press; 198-215.
15. Longino, H. E. 1996. "Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy. " In L. H. Nelson, and J. Nelson, eds., Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrechet: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 39-58.
16. Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Mc Allister, J. W. 1996. Beauty and Revolution in Science. Ithaca: Cornwell University Press.
18. Mc Allister, J. W. 1999. "Des théories trop belles pour être vraies. " Interview by S. Ruphy, La Recherche 324: 106-108.
19. Nelson, L. H. 1995. "A Feminist Naturalized Philosophy of Science. " Synthese 104: 399-421.
20. Pannekoek, A. 1961. A History of Astronomy. New York: Dover Publication.
21. Ruphy, S. 1994. "La classification des étoiles", BA thesis, Université de Toulouse.
22. Ruphy, S. 1997. "L'art de classer les étoiles. " Ciel et Espace: 323.
23. Ruphy, S. 2001. Review of Science de la science et réflexivité by P. Bourdieu, La Recherche 351: 81-82.
24. Tuana, N. 1995. "The Values of Science: Empiricism from a Feminist Perspective. " Synthese 104: 441-461.
25. Wylie, A. 2000. "Feminism in Philosophy of Science: Making Sense of Contingency and Constraint. " In M. Fricker, and J. Honsby, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 166-184.