Model driven performance measurement and assessment with MoDePeMART

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5795 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 62-76

  Bošković, Marko ^a   Hasselbring, Wilhelm ^b  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Model Driven Engineering; Software Performance Measurement and Assessment; Transformational and Reactive Systems

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; MODEL-DRIVEN; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; REACTIVE SYSTEM; RELATIONAL DATABASE; RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE QUALITY; STATE DIAGRAM; UML PROFILES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; LINGUISTICS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; QUERY LANGUAGES;

MODELS;

EID: 77249090404     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Hasselbring, W., Reussner, R.: Toward Trustworthy Software Systems. IEEE Computer 39(4), 91-92 (2006)
2. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 8th edn. Pearson/Addison Wesley, London (2007)
3. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, MA (2001)
4. Balsamo, S., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-Based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5), 295-310 (2004)
5. Selic, B.: A Short Course on MDA Specifications. In: INFWEST Seminar on Model Driven Software Engineering, Pirkkala, Tampere, Finland (2006)
6. Wieringa, R.J.: Design Methods for Reactive Systems: Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Fransisco (2003)
7. Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (1976)
8. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining Knowledge About Temporal Intervals. Communications of ACM 26(11), 832-843 (1983)
9. Object Management Group. UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification, OMG document formal/05-01-02 (January 2005a), http://www.omg.org/cgibin/apps/doc?formal/05-01-02.pdf (accessed May 2009)
10. Object Management Group. A UML Profile for MARTE: Modeling and Analyzing Real-Time and Embedded Systems, Beta 2, OMG Adopted Spec, OMG document ptc/2008-06-09 (June 2008), http://www.omgmarte.org/Documents/ Specificati©ns/08-06-09.pdf (accessed May 2009)
11. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1995)
12. Klar, R., Quick, A., Soetz, F.: Tools for a Model-driven Instrumentation for Monitoring. In: The 5th Int'l. Conf. on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Comp. Perf. Evaluation, pp. 165-180. Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., Amsterdam (1991)
13. Liao, Y., Cohen, D.: A Specificational Approach to High Level Program Monitoring and Measuring. IEEE Trans. on Soft. Engineering 18(11), 969-978 (1992)
14. Hollingsworth, J.K., Niam, O., Miller, B.P., Xu, Z., Gonçalves, M.J.R., Zheng, L.: MDL: A Language and a Compiler for Dynamic Program Instrumentation. In: Proc. of the 1997 Int. Con. on Parallel Architectures and Compiler Techniques, pp. 201-213. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1997)
15. The Open Group. Application Response Measurement (ARM)(1998), http://www.opengroup.org/tech/management/ana Technical Standard, Version 2, Issue 4.1 (accessed May 2009)
16. Mahrenholz, D., Spinczyk, O., Schroeder-Preikschat, W.: Program Instrumentation for Debugging and Monitoring with AspectC++. In: Proc. of the 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, pp. 249-256. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2002)
17. Debusmann, M., Geihs, K.: Efficient and Transparent Instrumentation of Application Components using an Aspect-oriented Approach. In: Brunner, M., Keller, A. (eds.) DSOM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2867, pp. 209-220. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
18. Diaconescu, A., Mos, A., Murphey, J.: Automatic Performance Management in Component Based Systems. In: 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 2004), pp. 214-221. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)
19. Object Management Group. UML 2.0 Specification: Superstructure, OMG document ptc/05- 07-04 (November 2004), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/ 05-07-04 (accessed May 2009)