메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 502-

Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: Evidence under construction vs. expert opinion

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA BALLOON; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; SURVIVAL; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DATA ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SAFETY; THERAPY EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

EID: 77249090222     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: 15229645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp522     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (3)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 69949164654 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis of controlled trials
    • Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, van der EM, Jewbali LS, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2102-2108.
    • (2009) Eur Heart J , vol.30 , pp. 2102-2108
    • Cheng, J.M.1    Den Uil, C.A.2    Hoeks, S.E.3    Van Der Em Jewbali, L.S.4    Van Domburg, R.T.5    Serruys, P.W.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.