|
Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 502-
|
Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: Evidence under construction vs. expert opinion
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AORTA BALLOON;
CARDIOGENIC SHOCK;
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK;
HEART ASSIST DEVICE;
HEART INFARCTION;
HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION;
HEMODYNAMICS;
HIGH RISK PATIENT;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
MORTALITY;
PERCUTANEOUS LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
ST SEGMENT ELEVATION;
SURVIVAL;
ANALYTICAL ERROR;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
DATA ANALYSIS;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
SAFETY;
THERAPY EFFECT;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);
CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT;
HEART-ASSIST DEVICES;
HUMANS;
INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC;
|
EID: 77249090222
PISSN: 0195668X
EISSN: 15229645
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp522 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (3)
|