Regional patterns of U.S. household carbon emissions

Climatic Change

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-63

  Pizer, William ^a   Sanchirico, James N ^a,b   Batz, Michael ^c  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CARBON EMISSIONS; CARBON INTENSITY; COMPENSATION PROGRAM; CONSUMER EXPENDITURE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY PRICES; ENERGY USE; GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION; LOUISIANA; NEW YORK; POLICY MAKERS; REGIONAL PATTERN; SUBSTANTIAL VARIATIONS; VULNERABLE REGIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL OILS; GASOLINE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GASOLINE;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOSSIL FUEL; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; NATURAL GAS; POLICY MAKING; POLLUTION TAX; VULNERABILITY;

LOUISIANA; TENSAS PARISH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77149180471     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9637-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Anselin L, Florax RJGM, Rey S (eds) (2004) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools, and applications. In: Advances in spatial science series, p 513, ISBN: 978-3-540-43729-1. Springer.
3. Baker P, Blundell R (1991) The microeconometric approach to modeling energy demand: some results for UK households. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 7(2): 54-76.
4. Bernard J-T, Bolduc D, Belanger D (1996) Quebec residential electricity demand: a microeconometric approach. Can J Econ 29(1): 92-113.
5. Borenstein, S (2007) Planet's woes? Blame coal: Texas leads in carbon emissions overall; Wyoming is tops per capita. Associated Press.
6. Burtraw D, Palmer K (2006) "Shifting the burden and spreading the wealth: who bears the cost of climate policy in the electricity sector?" RFF discussion paper 06-52 (July). Available at www. rff. org.
7. California Air Resources Board (CARB) (2002) Reducing climate change emissions from motor vehicles, vol 2004. Sacramento, California Air Resources Board. Available at http://www. arb. ca. gov/cc/factsheets/ccfactsheet. pdf.
8. Dahl C (1993) A survey of energy demand elasticities in support of the development of NEMS. ftp://ftp. eia. doe. gov/pub/oiaf/elasticitysurvey/elasticitysurvey_dahl. pdf.
9. Dinan T (2000) Who gains and who pays under carbon-allowance trading? The distributional effects of alternative policy designs. Congressional Budget Office, Washington.
10. Dubin JA, McFadden DL (1984) An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica 52(2): 345-362.
11. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton ME (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, Chichester.
12. May C, Brown R, Banwell P, Foery K, Offutt S, Wilson A (1996) Increasing the use of energy-efficient HVAC equipment in homes through the use of voluntary and profitable pollution prevention programs. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington.
13. Mufson S (2007) Climate change debate hinges on economics; lawmakers doubt voters would fund big carbon cuts, p A01. Washington Post.
14. Nadraya EA (1964) On estimating regression. Theory Probab Appl 15: 134-137.
15. Neumayer E (2002) Can natural factors explain any cross-country differences in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy 30: 7-12.
16. O'Neill, BC, Chen BS (2002) Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. In: Population and development review 28, Supplement: population and environment: methods of analysis, pp 53-88.
17. Osborn J, Marnay C, McMahon J (1999) Modeling the effects of appliance standards through geographic analysis. 1999 ESRI user conference proceedings. http://gis. esri. com/library/userconf/proc99/navigate/proceed. htm.
18. Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Jacoby HD, Gurgel AC, Metcalf GE, Sokolov AP, Holak JF (2007) Assessment of U. S. cap-and-trade proposals, report #146. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA.
19. 2 emissions. PNAS 104(24): 10288-10293.
20. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Staff working group (2005). In: RGGI memorandum of understanding. RGGI Staff Working Group, Albany.
21. Rose A, Zhang ZX (2004) Interregional burden-sharing of greenhouse gas mitigation in the United States. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change 9(3): 477-500.
22. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. In: Cox D, Reid N, Rubin DB, Silverman BW (eds.) Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 26. Chapman and Hall, London.
23. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 36: 111-147.
24. Watson GS (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya Ser A 26: 359-372.