Estimating freight flows for metropolitan area highway networks using secondary data sources

Networks and Spatial Economics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-91

  Giuliano, Genevieve ^a   Gordon, Peter ^a   Pan, Qisheng ^b   Park, JiYoung ^a   Wang, LanLan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commodity flows; Freight modeling; Truck traffic

Indexed keywords

COMMODITY FLOW; CURRENT ESTIMATION; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS; METROPOLITAN AREA; SECONDARY DATA SOURCES; SECONDARY SOURCES; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; TRUCK TRAFFIC;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

ESTIMATION;

EID: 77149176003     PISSN: 1566113X     EISSN: 15729427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-007-9024-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ambite JL, Weathers M (2005) Automatic composition of aggregation workflows for transportation modeling. Conference Proceedings, dg. o, pp 41-49.
2. Ambite JL, Kapoor D, Jinwala M (2006) Data processing workflows in the social sciences: Representation and automatic generation. Conference Proceedings, dg. o, pp 321-322.
3. Beckman M, Winston C, McGuire C (1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN.
4. Brogan JJ, Brich SC, Demetsky MJ (2001) Application of a Statewide Intermodal Freight Planning Methodology, Final Report to the Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), VTRC 02-R5.
5. Cambridge Systematics (1997) A Guidebook for Forecasting Freight Transportation Demand. NCHRP Report 388. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
6. Cho S, Gordon P, Moore JE, Richardson HW (2001) Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake. J Reg Sci 41(1): 39-65.
7. Echenique M, Partners (1994) MEPLAN User Reference Manual, Cambridge, England.
8. Fischer MJ, Outwater ML, Cheng L, Ahanotu DN, Calix R (2005) Innovative framework for modeling freight transportation in Los Angeles County, California. Transp Res Rec (1906): 105-112.
9. Fischer MJ, Hicks G, Cartwright K (2006) Performance measure evaluation of port truck trip reduction strategies, The National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, CA, Feb. 1-3.
10. Giuliano G (1998) Information technology, work patterns and intra-metropolitan location: a case study. Urban Studies 35: 1077-1095.
11. Giuliano G, O'Brien T, Hayden S, Dell'aquila P (2005) The Terminal Gate Appointment System at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: An Assessment, http://www. metrans. org/nuf/documents/Giuliano_OBrien. pdf.
12. Gordon P, Liao Y-CH, Richardson HW (1998) Household commuting: implications of the behavior of two-worker households for land-use/transportation models. In Lars L, Lars-Göran M, Tschangho JK (eds) Network infrastructure and the urban environment: advances in spatial systems modeling. Springer, New York, pp 84-99.
13. Gordon P, Pan Q-Sh (2001) Assembling and Processing Freight Shipment Data: Developing a GIS-Based Origin-Destination Matrix for Southern California Freight Flows. National Center for Metropolitan Transportation Research http://www. metrans. org).
14. Hedges CA (1971) Demand forecasting and Development of a Framework for Evaluation of Urban Commodity flow: Statement of the Problem. In Special Report 120: Urban Commodity Flow. Highway Research Board, Washington DC, pp 145-148.
15. Holguin-Veras J, List GF, Meyburg AH, Ozbay K, Teng H, Yahalom S (2001) An Assessment Of Methodological Alternatives for a Regional Freight Model in the NYMTC Region, http://www. utrc2. org/research/assets/6/regionalfreight1. html.
16. Holguin-Veras J, Patil G (2007) An integrated commodity based /empty trip freight origin destination synthesis model, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2007 Paper #07-1659.
17. Holguin-Veras J, Thorson E (2000) Trip length distribution in commodity based and trip-based freight demand modeling: investigation of relationships. Transp Res Rec (1707): 37-48.
18. Holguin-Veras J, Thorson E (2003) Practical implications of modeling commercial vehicle empty trips. Transp Res Rec (1833): 87-94.
19. Holguin-Veras J, Zorrilla JC (2006) A first approximation to longitudinal modeling of commercial vehicle empty trips. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Paper #06-0263.
20. Jack Faucett Associates (1999) Research and Development of Destination, Mode, and Routing Choice Models for Freight, Final Report, Prepared for DOT SBIR Office, DTS-22.
21. Johnston R (2004) The urban transportation planning process. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) The Geography of Urban Transportation, 3rd edn. Guilford, New York, pp 115-140.
22. Jonnavithula SS (2004) Development of structural equations models of statewide freight flows, Master thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida.
23. KJS Associates, and Parsons Brinckerhoff (1996a) Statewide travel demand model update and calibration phase, Truck Trip Model, Chapter 10, February.
24. KJS Associates, and Parsons Brinckerhoff (1996b) Statewide travel demand model update and calibration phase II, Commodity Flow Data, Chapter 3, February.
25. Liedtke G, Babani J, Ott A (2006) Data organization pattern for microscopic freight demand models, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2006 Paper #06-2410.
26. Miller E (2003) Land use-transportation modeling, chapter 5. In: K Goulias (ed) Transportation system planning methods and applications. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 5-1-5-24.
27. Minnesota IMPLAN Group Inc. (MIG) (2000). IMPLAN professional user guide, 2nd edn. Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Stillwater, MN.
28. Park JY, Gordon P, Moore II JE, Richardson HW (2007) Simulating the state-by-state effects of terrorist attacks on three major u. s. ports: applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model). In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore II JE (eds) The economic costs and consequences of terrorism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 208-234.
29. Ruiter ER (1992) Development of an urban truck model for the Phoenix Metropolitan Area, Final Report, Cambridge Systematics and O' Neil Associates.
30. Sivakumar A, Bhat C (2002) A fractional split distribution model for statewide commodity flow analysis. Transp Res Rec (1790): 80-88.
31. Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
32. Sorratini JA, Smith RL (2000) Development of a statewide truck trip forecasting model based on commodity flows and input-output coefficients. Transp Res Rec (1707): 49-55.
33. Souleyrette RR, Hans ZN, Pathak S (1996) Statewide transportation planning model and methodology development program, Final Report to Iowa Department of Transportation and Midwest Transportation Center.
34. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)/Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (LAMTA) (2004), Regional Screenline Traffic Count Program: Final Report, Prepared by Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Los Angles, California.
35. Southworth F (2003) Freight transportation planning: models and methods. In: Konstadinos GG (ed) Transportation system planning. CRC, New York.
36. Stefan K, McMillan J, Hunt J (2005) Urban commercial vehicle movement model for Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Transp Res Rec 1921: 1-10.
37. US Department of Transportation (USDOT) (1996) Quick response freight manual-Final Report, Washington, D. C.
38. US Department of Transportation (USDOT) (2006) National transportation statistics 2006, Washington, D. C.
39. Waddell P, Borning A, Noth M, Freier N, Becke M, Ulfarsson G (2003) Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: design and implementation of UrbanSim. Netw Spat Econ 3(1): 43-67.
40. Wilbur Smith Associates (1997) Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model Final Calibration Report, prepared for Kentucky Transportation Center and Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
41. WISERTrade (2006) Port Level Total Trade Value for Los Angeles Port and Long Beach Port. WISERTrade Organization, Holyoke, Maryland.
42. Wisetjindawat W, Sano K, Matsumoto S (2006) Commodity Distribution Model Incorporating Spatial Interactions for Urban Freight Movement, Transportation Research Board (TRB) 2006 Annual Meeting, Paper #06-1856.