A model of incomplete adaptation to a severely shifted frequency-to- electrode mapping by cochlear implant users

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 69-78

  Sagi, Elad ^a   Fu, Qian Jie ^b   Galvin, John J ^b   Svirsky, Mario A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Electrical hearing; Spectral distortion

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; PHONETICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 77149173461     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0187-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D Başkent RV Shannon 2004 Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners J Acoust Soc Am 116 3130 3140 10.1121/1.1804627 15603158 (Pubitemid 39575558)
2. D Başkent RV Shannon 2005 Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping J Acoust Soc Am 117 1405 1416 10.1121/1.1856273 15807028 (Pubitemid 40358009)
3. LA Chistovich VV Lublinskaya 1979 The 'center of gravity' effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli Hearing Res 1 185 195 10.1016/0378-5955(79) 90012-1 (Pubitemid 9245871)
4. NI Durlach LD Braida 1969 Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution J Acoust Soc Am 46 372 383 10.1121/1.1911699 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3ms1Cnsw%3D%3D 5804107
5. A Faulkner S Rosen C Norman 2006 The right information may matter more than frequency-place alignment: simulations of frequency-aligned and upward shifting cochlear implant processors for a shallow electrode array insertion Ear Hear 27 139 152 10.1097/01.aud.0000202357.40662.85 16518142 (Pubitemid 44378657)
6. Q-J Fu JJ Galvin III 2007 Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients Trends Amplif 11 193 205 10.1177/1084713807301379 17709574 (Pubitemid 47246425)
7. Q-J Fu RV Shannon 1999 Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing J Acoust Soc Am 105 1889 1900 10.1121/1.426725 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ovFCrsw%3D%3D 10089611 (Pubitemid 29115838)
8. Q-J Fu RV Shannon 1999 Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant Ear Hear 20 332 344 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00006 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpsVCntw%3D%3D 10466569 (Pubitemid 29382373)
9. Q-J Fu RV Shannon JJ Galvin III 2002 Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant J Acoust Soc Am 112 1664 1674 10.1121/1.1502901 12398471
10. J Hillenbrand LA Getty MJ Clark K Wheeler 1995 Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels J Acoust Soc Am 97 3099 3111 10.1121/1.411872 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3nvFGmuw%3D%3D 7759650
11. PM Hofman JGA Van Riswick AJ Van Opstal 1998 Relearning sound localization with new ears Nat Neurosci 1 417 421 10.1038/1633 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXitVCgtb4%3D 10196533
12. BJ Kwon C van den Honert 2006 Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users J Acoust Soc Am 120 EL1 EL6 10.1121/1.2208152 16875252 (Pubitemid 44014142)
13. T Li Q-J Fu 2007 Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8 32 41 10.1007/s10162-006-0059-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkvFWjsLo%3D 17131213 (Pubitemid 46214118)
14. GE Peterson HL Barney 1952 Control methods used in a study of the vowels J Acoust Soc Am 24 175 184 10.1121/1.1906875
15. LAJ Reiss CW Turner SR Erenberg BJ Gantz 2007 Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8 241 257 10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8 17347777 (Pubitemid 46659325)
16. S Rosen A Faulkner L Wilkinson 1999 Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 106 3629 3636 10.1121/1.428215 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fot1GlsQ%3D%3D 10615701
17. MA Svirsky 2000 Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by users of analog multichannel cochlear implants: temporal and channel-amplitude cues J Acoust Soc Am 107 1521 1529 10.1121/1.428459 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gtlaqsQ%3D%3D 10738806 (Pubitemid 30141694)
18. Svirsky MA (2002) The multidimensional phoneme identification (MPI) model: a new quantitative framework to explain the perception of speech sounds by cochlear implant users. In: Serniclaes W (ed) Etudes et Travaux Vol. 5. Institut de Phonetique et des Langues Vivantes of the ULB, Brussels, pp 143-186
19. Svirsky MA, Talavage TM, Sinha S, Neuburger H (2004) Adaptation to a shifted frequency map: gradual is better. Annual Meeting of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science ( http://www.aaas.org/meetings/ ), Seattle, Feb. 12-16, 2004
20. TA Zwolan LM Collins GH Wakefield 1997 Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects J Acoust Soc Am 102 3673 3685 10.1121/1.420401 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FntFKhtA%3D%3D 9407659 (Pubitemid 28008319)