Response to intervention and English-language learners: Instructional and assessment considerations

Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-120

  Linan Thompson, Sylvia ^a   Ortiz, Alba A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

English language learners; Language disorders; Learning disabilities; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEARNING DISORDER; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; READING; SCHOOL; SPEECH DISORDER; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EDUCATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MULTILINGUALISM; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; READING; SCHOOLS; SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 77149144476     PISSN: 09482393     EISSN: 14391651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215718     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. The growing numbers of limited English proficient students: 1995/96-2005/06. Available at: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ policy/ states/reports/statedata/2005LEP/GrowingLEP-0506.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2008
2. Fry R. How far behind in math and reading are English language learners? Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center; Available at: http://pewhispanic. org/files/reports/76.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2008.
3. National Center for Educational Statistics. The Condition of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2004
4. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub L No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
5. Zehler AM, Fleischman HL, Hopstock PJ, Pendzick M, Stephenson TG. Descriptive Study of Services to LEP Student and LEP Students with Disabilities. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.; 2003;(Special topic #4: Findings on special education LEP students)
6. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. 27th Annual report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2005. Available at: http://www.ed.gov/reports/ annual/osep/2005/parts-b-c/index.html. Accessed March 3, 2009
7. Artiles AJ, Rueda R, Salazar I, Higareda J. English-language learner representation in special education in California urban school districts. In: Losen DJ, Orfield G, eds. Racial Inequality in Special Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2002:117-136
8. Beck IL, McKeown MG, Kucan L. Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2002
9. National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction [NIH Publication No. 00-4769]. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2000
10. RAND Reading Study Group. Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2002
11. Fletcher JM, Shaywitz SE, Shankweiler DP, et al. Cognitive profiles of reading disability: comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. J Educ Psychol 1994;86:6-23
12. Vellutino FR, Scanlon DM, Lyon GR. Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: more evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. J Learn Disabil 2000;33:223-238
13. Gresham F. Responsiveness to intervention: an alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In: Bradley R, Danielson L, Hallahan DP, eds. Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001:467-519
14. Liu Y, Ortiz AA, Wilkinson CY, Robertson P, Kushner MI. From early childhood special education to special education resource rooms: identification, assessment, and eligibility determinations for English language learners with reading-related disabilities. Assess Effective Intervent 2008;33:177-187
15. Texas Education Agency. Chapter 89. Adaptations for Special Populations. Subchapter AA. Commissioner's Rules Concerning Special Education Services [Section 89.1040. Eligibility criteria]. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency; 2002
16. Schoenbrodt L, Kumin L, Sloan JM. Learning disabilities existing concomitantly with communication disorder. J Learn Disabil 1997;30:264-281
17. Gerber A. Language-Related Learning Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1993
18. Sawyer DJ. Language abilities, reading acquisition, and developmental dyslexia: a discussion of hypothetical and observed relationships. J Learn Disabil 1992;25:82-95
19. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub L 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
20. Wilkinson CY, Ortiz AA, Robertson P, Kushner M. English language learners with reading-related learning disabilities: linking data from multiple sources to make eligibility determinations. J Learn Disabil 2006;39:129-141
21. Vaughn S, Linan-Thompson S, Mathes PG, et al. Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for 1st grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties. J Learn Disabil 2006;39:56-73
22. Vaughn S, Mathes PG, Linan-Thompson S, et al. Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elem Sch J 2006;107:153-181
23. Klingner JK, Edwards PA. Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Read Res Q 2006;41:108-117
24. Linan-Thompson S, Cirino PT, Vaughn S. Determining English language learners response to intervention: questions and some answers. Learn Disabil Q 2007;30:185-196
25. Ortiz AA. Prevention of school failure and early intervention for English language learners. In: Artiles AJ, Ortiz AA, eds. English Language Learners with Special Education Needs: Identi-fication, Assessment, and Instruction. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems; 2002:31-63
26. García SB, Ortiz AA. Cultural and linguistic considerations in implementing response to intervention models. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners 2009; In press
27. August D, Hakuta K. Improving Schooling for Language-Minority Children: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997
28. Montecel MR, Cortez JD. Successful bilingual education programs: development and dissemination of criteria to identify promising and exemplary practices in bilingual education at the national level. Biling Res J 2002;26: 1-21
29. Goldenberg C, Sullivan J. Making Change Happen in a Language-Minority School: A Search for Coherence. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics; 1994;EPR #13
30. Gresham FM. Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psych Rev 1989;18:37-50
31. SimmonsDC, Kuykendall K, King K, Cornachione C, Kame'enui EJ. Implementation of a schoolwide reading improvement model: "No one ever told us it would be this hard!". Learn Disabil Res Pract 2000; 15:92-100
32. García SB, Wilkinson CY, Ortiz AA. Enhancing achievement for language minority students: classroom, school, and family contexts. Educ Urban Soc 1995;27:441-462
33. Baker S, Good R. Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: a validation study with second-grade students. School Psych Rev 1995;24:561-578
34. Dominguez de Ramirez R, Shapiro E. Curriculum-based measurement and the evaluation of reading skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. School Psych Rev 2006;35:356-369
35. Leafstedt J, Richards C, Gerber M. Effectiveness of explicit phonological-awareness instruction for at-risk English learners. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2004;19:252-261
36. Wiley HI, Deno SL. Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial Spec Educ 2005;26:207-214
37. Chiappe P, Siegel L, Wade-Woolley L. Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: a longitudinal study. Sci Stud Read 2002;6:369-400
38. Durgunoglu AY, Nagy WE, Hancin-Bhatt BJ. Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. J Educ Psychol 1993;85:453-465
39. Lesaux N, Siegel L. The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Dev Psychol 2003;39:1005-1019
40. Deno SL. Curriculum-based measurement: the emerging alternative. Except Child 1985;52:219-232
41. Shinn MR. Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1998
42. Tunmer WE, Chapman JW. Context use in early reading development: premature exclusion of a source or individual differences? Issues in Education 1995;1:97-100
43. Francis DJ, Rivera M, Lesaux NK, Kieffer M, Rivera H. Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners: Research-Based Recommendations for Instruction and Academic Interventions. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction; 2006
44. VanDerHeyden AM, Witt JC. Quantifying context in assessment: capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psych Rev 2005; 34:161-183
45. Linan-Thompson S, Hickman-Davis P. Supplemental reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: improve reading thirty minutes at a time. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2002; 17:242-251
46. Vaughn S, Linan-Thompson S, Hickman-Davis P. Response to treatment as a means for identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Except Child 2003;69:391-410
47. DiCerbo PA. Common practices for uncommon learners: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. In: Framing Effective Practice: Topics and Issues in Education [sic] English Language learners. Washington, DC: National Clearing-house for Bilingual Education; Available at: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ pubs/tasynthesis/framing/ 1commonpractices.htm. Accessed October 11, 2008
48. Goldenberg C. A balanced approach to early Spanish literacy instruction. In: Gersten R, Jimenez R, eds. Promoting Learning for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students: Classroom Applications from Contemporary Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1998:3-25
49. Cummins J. The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In: Office of Bilingual Education, California State Department of Education, ed. Schooling and Language Minority Students: A Theoretical Framework. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, CSULA; 1981:3-49
50. Cummins J. Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters; 1985
51. Krashen SD. Bilingual education: a focus on current research. In: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education Focus: Occasional Papers in Bilingual Education; 1991
52. Snow CE, Burns MS, Griffin P. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998
53. Coelho E. Introducing second language acquisition. In: Adding English: A Guide to Teaching in Multilingual Classrooms. Toronto, Canada: Pippin; 2004:141-166
54. Krashen SD. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1982
55. Gersten R, Jimenez R. Promoting Learning for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students: Classroom Applications from Contemporary Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1998
56. Gersten R, Baker SK, Shanahan T, Linan-Thompson S, Chiappe P, Scarcella R. Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades: A Practice Guide (NCEE 2007-4011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2007
57. Geva E, Yaghoub-Zadeh Z. Reading efficiency in native English-speaking and English-as-a-second-language children: the role of oral proficiency and underlying cognitive-linguistic processes. Sci Stud Read 2006;10:31-57
58. Denton CA, Anthony JA, Parker R, Hasbrouck JE. Effects of two tutoring programs on the English reading development of Spanish-English bilingual students. Elem Sch J 2004;104:289-305
59. Gunn B, Biglan A, Smolkowski K, Ary D. The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. J Spec Educ 2000;34: 90-103
60. Troia GA. Responsiveness to intervention: roles for speech-language pathologists in the prevention and identification of learning disabilities. Top Lang Disord 2005;25:106-119